[Xenomai-core] Problem booting xenomai r662 on PowerPc

2006-03-06 Thread Niklaus Giger
Hi After a couple of month I try to recompile xenomai and now neither my Powerbook nor my PPC405 build start up. I accepted all default values which showed up done in a "make oldconfig" (e.g. All I get is: ## Transferring control to Linux (at address ) ... id mach(): done MMU:enter MMU:h

Re: [Xenomai-core] Fundamental Questions

2006-03-06 Thread Jan Kiszka
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Dear Gurus, > > I have 2 fundamental questions and I appologize in advance to burden you with > more answering jobs stealing your precious development time, but at least the > first question is crutial to our project. > > 1.) > Essentially the question deals with the

Re: [Xenomai-core] About the versioning scheme in the repository

2006-03-06 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Romain Lenglet wrote: > ... > > > The current xenomai-svn package would then have version > > > 2.0.93+svn20060306 (or something like that). > > > > Adding the atomic commit number would be useful. > > Good idea, that makes more sense. Please do not forget to re-run bootstrap when modifyin

Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC, Experimental Patch] nested irq disable calls

2006-03-06 Thread Philippe Gerum
Dmitry Adamushko wrote: Hi there, the following patches illustrate _experimental_ implementation of nested irq disable calls. This new feature would allow us to have scalar return values of ISR and avoid the need for NOENABLE bit. [ Ok, repeating myself one more time... we would have NONE,

[Xenomai-core] Fundamental Questions

2006-03-06 Thread Roderik_Wildenburg
Dear Gurus, I have 2 fundamental questions and I appologize in advance to burden you with more answering jobs stealing your precious development time, but at least the first question is crutial to our project. 1.) Essentially the question deals with the problem, how long a Xenomai task in seco

Re: [Xenomai-core] About the versioning scheme in the repository

2006-03-06 Thread Romain Lenglet
... > > The current xenomai-svn package would then have version > > 2.0.93+svn20060306 (or something like that). > > Adding the atomic commit number would be useful. Good idea, that makes more sense. ... > > So, could someone confirm that what is currently done is > > scheme 2), i.e. the version

[Xenomai-core] System-V initialization script

2006-03-06 Thread Romain Lenglet
Hi, Here is a patch that adds a System-V init script to the distribution. This script creates/deletes the devices in /dev and sets the latency through /proc/xenomai/latency. Please re-run automake before committing (if committing). Is there anything more it should do? For instance, is there a w

Re: [Xenomai-core] About the versioning scheme in the repository

2006-03-06 Thread Philippe Gerum
Romain Lenglet wrote: Hi, When is the version number changed in the config/version file? Is that value the version 1) of the next release being prepared, or 2) of the last release? This is a concern for packaging. I would like to make two series of Debian packages: xenomai, libxenomai, etc.