Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> >> Looking at the difference between RTDM documentation blocks and the
> >> other modules is that the other modules use the "fn" tag. Removing the
> >> "fn" tag from other modules documentation blocks seems to solve the
>
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> >> Looking at the difference between RTDM documentation blocks and the
> >> other modules is that the other modules use the "fn" tag. Removing the
> >> "fn" tag from other modules documentation blocks seems to solve the
>
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> > ROSSIER Daniel wrote:
>> > > Dear Xenomai workers,
>> > >
>> > > Would it be possible to have an updated API documentation for Xenomai
>> > > 2.0.x ? (I mean with formal parameters in function prototypes)
>> > >
>> >
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> > ROSSIER Daniel wrote:
>> > > Dear Xenomai workers,
>> > >
>> > > Would it be possible to have an updated API documentation for Xenomai
>> > > 2.0.x ? (I mean with formal parameters in function prototypes)
>> > >
>> >
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > ROSSIER Daniel wrote:
> > > Dear Xenomai workers,
> > >
> > > Would it be possible to have an updated API documentation for Xenomai
> > > 2.0.x ? (I mean with formal parameters in function prototypes)
> > >
> > > I tried to regenerate it
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> ROSSIER Daniel wrote:
> > Dear Xenomai workers,
> >
> > Would it be possible to have an updated API documentation for Xenomai
> > 2.0.x ? (I mean with formal parameters in function prototypes)
> >
> > I tried to regenerate it with make generate-doc, but it seems that a
ROSSIER Daniel wrote:
> Dear Xenomai workers,
>
> Would it be possible to have an updated API documentation for Xenomai
> 2.0.x ? (I mean with formal parameters in function prototypes)
>
> I tried to regenerate it with make generate-doc, but it seems that a
> SVN working dir is required.
>
> It
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De
> la part de Jan Kiszka
> Envoyé : mercredi, 18. janvier 2006 20:03
> À : xenomai-core
> Objet : [Xenomai-core] broken docs
>
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that the doxygen API output is
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > ROSSIER Daniel wrote:
> > > Dear Xenomai workers,
> > >
> > > Would it be possible to have an updated API documentation for Xenomai
> > > 2.0.x ? (I mean with formal parameters in function prototypes)
> > >
> > > I tried to regenerate it
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> ROSSIER Daniel wrote:
> > Dear Xenomai workers,
> >
> > Would it be possible to have an updated API documentation for Xenomai
> > 2.0.x ? (I mean with formal parameters in function prototypes)
> >
> > I tried to regenerate it with make generate-doc, but it seems that a
ROSSIER Daniel wrote:
> Dear Xenomai workers,
>
> Would it be possible to have an updated API documentation for Xenomai
> 2.0.x ? (I mean with formal parameters in function prototypes)
>
> I tried to regenerate it with make generate-doc, but it seems that a
> SVN working dir is required.
>
> It
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De
> la part de Jan Kiszka
> Envoyé : mercredi, 18. janvier 2006 20:03
> À : xenomai-core
> Objet : [Xenomai-core] broken docs
>
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that the doxygen API output is
Hi,
I noticed that the doxygen API output is partly broken. Under the
nucleus and native skin modules most functions became variables. I
haven't looked at the source yet, but I guess it should be resolvable,
especially as the RTDM docs are fine. This mail is to file the issue,
maybe I will have a
Hi,
I noticed that the doxygen API output is partly broken. Under the
nucleus and native skin modules most functions became variables. I
haven't looked at the source yet, but I guess it should be resolvable,
especially as the RTDM docs are fine. This mail is to file the issue,
maybe I will have a
14 matches
Mail list logo
