Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH, RFC] nucleus:shared irq, draft v.2

2006-01-11 Thread Dmitry Adamushko
On 09/01/06, Gilles Chanteperdrix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dmitry Adamushko wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I'm presenting it one last time as a draft, so it's a right time to give all > the remarks concerning design/implementation issues for all interested > parties. > > Any feedback is wellcome.May

Re: [Xenomai-core] latency kernel part crashes on ppc64

2006-01-11 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Philippe Gerum wrote: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > > Philippe Gerum wrote: > > > Likely not this time (keep it cold anyway, who knows); I strongly > > suspect a bug in > > > xnarch_switch_to() for all archs but x86 > > > > Now that you are talking about it, I may be the one who owes

Re: [Xenomai-core] latency kernel part crashes on ppc64

2006-01-11 Thread Jan Kiszka
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Philippe Gerum wrote: > > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > > > Philippe Gerum wrote: > > > > Likely not this time (keep it cold anyway, who knows); I strongly > suspect a bug in > > > > xnarch_switch_to() for all archs but x86 > > > > > > Now that you are talki

[Xenomai-core] latency kernel part fixed

2006-01-11 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > > Philippe Gerum wrote: > > > Likely not this time (keep it cold anyway, who knows); I strongly suspect a bug in > > > xnarch_switch_to() for all archs but x86 > > > > Now that you are talkin

Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH, RFC] nucleus:shared irq, draft v.2

2006-01-11 Thread Dmitry Adamushko
On 09/01/06, Gilles Chanteperdrix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dmitry Adamushko wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I'm presenting it one last time as a draft, so it's a right time to give all > the remarks concerning design/implementation issues for all interested > parties. > > Any feedback is wellcome.May

Re: [Xenomai-core] latency kernel part crashes on ppc64

2006-01-11 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Philippe Gerum wrote: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > > Philippe Gerum wrote: > > > Likely not this time (keep it cold anyway, who knows); I strongly > > suspect a bug in > > > xnarch_switch_to() for all archs but x86 > > > > Now that you are talking about it, I may be the one who owes

Re: [Xenomai-core] latency kernel part crashes on ppc64

2006-01-11 Thread Jan Kiszka
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Philippe Gerum wrote: > > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > > > Philippe Gerum wrote: > > > > Likely not this time (keep it cold anyway, who knows); I strongly > suspect a bug in > > > > xnarch_switch_to() for all archs but x86 > > > > > > Now that you are talki