Re: [Xenomai-core] ... the rt-preempt patch once been in fusion

2006-02-06 Thread Philippe Gerum
Hannes Mayer wrote: Ciao Philippe! Philippe Gerum wrote: [...] Clearly not, it is still on the project's agenda, but PREEMPT_RT has been too much of a moving target recently, not to speak of the vanilla 2.6 kernel itself. Recently ? As for Kernel 2.6 there has always been too much develop

Re: [Xenomai-core] xenomai posix build errs

2006-02-06 Thread Jim Cromie
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jim Cromie wrote: > > build error after selecting POSIX interface, > on svn-head - ie 515 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6.15.1-ipipe-103-sonyI]$ make > CHK include/linux/version.h > SPLIT include/linux/autoconf.h -> include/config/* > CHK include/linux/comp

[Xenomai-core] [BUG] problems with adeos-ipipe-2.6.14-ppc-1.2-00.patch

2006-02-06 Thread Anders Blomdell
When trying to patch with latest version of this patch, I get: patching file include/asm-ppc/ipipe.h Hunk #1 FAILED at 1. Hunk #2 FAILED at 149. Hunk #3 FAILED at 160. Hunk #4 FAILED at 195. Problem seems to be at line 4168 in the patch, where it says @@ -0,1 +1,179 @@ but the old [working] pa

Re: [Xenomai-core] [BUG] problems with adeos-ipipe-2.6.14-ppc-1.2-00.patch

2006-02-06 Thread Philippe Gerum
Anders Blomdell wrote: When trying to patch with latest version of this patch, I get: patching file include/asm-ppc/ipipe.h Hunk #1 FAILED at 1. Hunk #2 FAILED at 149. Hunk #3 FAILED at 160. Hunk #4 FAILED at 195. Problem seems to be at line 4168 in the patch, where it says @@ -0,1 +1,179 @@

Re: [Xenomai-core] ... the rt-preempt patch once been in fusion

2006-02-06 Thread Philippe Gerum
Hannes Mayer wrote: Hi all! Well, subject says almost all. I remember there has been an effort to make a fusion/rt-preempt patch conglomerate back then. I'm just curious (as I've just been toying with the Molnar patch) - has that thing been dropped in xeno completely ? Clearly not, it is stil

Re: [Xenomai-core] ... the rt-preempt patch once been in fusion

2006-02-06 Thread Hannes Mayer
Ciao Philippe! Philippe Gerum wrote: [...] Clearly not, it is still on the project's agenda, but PREEMPT_RT has been too much of a moving target recently, not to speak of the vanilla 2.6 kernel itself. Recently ? As for Kernel 2.6 there has always been too much development for a stable relea

Re: [Xenomai-core] ... the rt-preempt patch once been in fusion

2006-02-06 Thread Philippe Gerum
Hannes Mayer wrote: Ciao Philippe! Philippe Gerum wrote: [...] Clearly not, it is still on the project's agenda, but PREEMPT_RT has been too much of a moving target recently, not to speak of the vanilla 2.6 kernel itself. Recently ? As for Kernel 2.6 there has always been too much develop

Re: [Xenomai-core] xenomai posix build errs

2006-02-06 Thread Jim Cromie
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jim Cromie wrote: > > build error after selecting POSIX interface, > on svn-head - ie 515 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6.15.1-ipipe-103-sonyI]$ make > CHK include/linux/version.h > SPLIT include/linux/autoconf.h -> include/config/* > CHK include/linux/comp

[Xenomai-core] [BUG] problems with adeos-ipipe-2.6.14-ppc-1.2-00.patch

2006-02-06 Thread Anders Blomdell
When trying to patch with latest version of this patch, I get: patching file include/asm-ppc/ipipe.h Hunk #1 FAILED at 1. Hunk #2 FAILED at 149. Hunk #3 FAILED at 160. Hunk #4 FAILED at 195. Problem seems to be at line 4168 in the patch, where it says @@ -0,1 +1,179 @@ but the old [working] pa

Re: [Xenomai-core] [BUG] problems with adeos-ipipe-2.6.14-ppc-1.2-00.patch

2006-02-06 Thread Philippe Gerum
Anders Blomdell wrote: When trying to patch with latest version of this patch, I get: patching file include/asm-ppc/ipipe.h Hunk #1 FAILED at 1. Hunk #2 FAILED at 149. Hunk #3 FAILED at 160. Hunk #4 FAILED at 195. Problem seems to be at line 4168 in the patch, where it says @@ -0,1 +1,179 @@