This is a note to the Xenomai and/or Adeos users over the Blackfin
architecture. A very annoying issue (aka brown-paperbag bug) has just
been fixed in the Adeos/blackfin support, which basically made all POSIX
timing services inaccurate. Upgrading to the newest patch is strongly
recommended.
Here is a candidate Adeos patch for the imx21 board. It applies on top
of 2.6.14 + generic IMX21 patch + vanilla Adeos 2.6.14-1.3-04 patch.
Great job !
--
Marco Cavallini
Koan s.a.s. - Bergamo - ITALIA
Embedded and Real-Time Software Engineering
www.KoanSoftware.com |www.KaeilOS.com
___
Marco Cavallini wrote:
Here is a candidate Adeos patch for the imx21 board. It applies on top
of 2.6.14 + generic IMX21 patch + vanilla Adeos 2.6.14-1.3-04 patch.
Great job !
Actually, Daniel and his team at Heig-VD did the job entirely. I'm only
the picky guy playing with patchutils here
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting nmi alarms about latency being > 100 us on a dual P-III 1GHz
(with and without CONFIG_SMP) once I start the latency test tool. But
the must be false positive. Can someone comment on this trace:
Issue confirmed here, on a dual 750 Mhz PIII Celeron. Starting th
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm getting nmi alarms about latency being > 100 us on a dual P-III 1GHz
> > (with and without CONFIG_SMP) once I start the latency test tool. But
> > the must be false positive. Can someone comment on this trace:
> >
>
> Issue c
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm getting nmi alarms about latency being > 100 us on a dual P-III 1GHz
> > (with and without CONFIG_SMP) once I start the latency test tool. But
> > the must be false positive. Can someone comment on t
