Re: [Xenomai-core] crashing 2.6.22

2007-10-01 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
On 9/30/07, Jan Kiszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 13:42 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 12:22 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: ... And a third one only gives me Detected illicit call from

Re: [Xenomai-core] crashing 2.6.22

2007-10-01 Thread Jan Kiszka
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: On 9/30/07, Jan Kiszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 13:42 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 12:22 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: ... And a third one only gives me Detected

Re: [Xenomai-core] crashing 2.6.22

2007-10-01 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
On 10/1/07, Jan Kiszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: On 9/30/07, Jan Kiszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 13:42 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 12:22 +0200, Jan Kiszka

Re: [Xenomai-core] crashing 2.6.22

2007-10-01 Thread Jan Kiszka
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: On 10/1/07, Jan Kiszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: On 9/30/07, Jan Kiszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 13:42 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: On Sun, 2007-09-30 at

Re: [Xenomai-core] crashing 2.6.22

2007-10-01 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
On 10/1/07, Jan Kiszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: On 10/1/07, Jan Kiszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: On 9/30/07, Jan Kiszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 13:42 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: Jan Kiszka

Re: [Xenomai-core] crashing 2.6.22

2007-10-01 Thread Labozzetta, Saverio
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Jan Kiszka Sent: Mon 2007-10-01 11:32 AM To: Gilles Chanteperdrix Cc: xenomai-core Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] crashing 2.6.22 Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: On 10/1/07, Jan Kiszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix

Re: [Xenomai-core] ARM compiling error

2007-10-01 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
On 10/1/07, Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/1/07, Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I install Xenomai 2.3.4 for ARM on 2.6.20 kernel. The prepare-kernel script work well. Which ARM machine ? Which version of the ARM patch ? From your compilation log, I would say that

Re: [Xenomai-core] crashing 2.6.22

2007-10-01 Thread Labozzetta, Saverio
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Labozzetta, Saverio Sent: Mon 2007-10-01 2:42 PM To: Jan Kiszka; Gilles Chanteperdrix Cc: xenomai-core Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] crashing 2.6.22 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Jan Kiszka

Re: [Xenomai-core] ARM compiling error

2007-10-01 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
On 10/1/07, Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Message d'origine- De: Gilles Chanteperdrix [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé: lundi, 1. octobre 2007 15:11 À: Patrick Cc: xenomai-core Objet: Re: [Xenomai-core] ARM compiling error On 10/1/07, Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[Xenomai-core] [BUG] posix skin thread doesn't respect /proc/xenomai/affinity

2007-10-01 Thread Jan Kiszka
Hi Gilles, almost forgot to report this, didn't find time to dig into it. You can easily check this with cyclictest: affinity mask set to 2, the test will still schedule on CPU0. Jan signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___

Re: [Xenomai-core] [BUG] posix skin thread doesn't respect /proc/xenomai/affinity

2007-10-01 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi Gilles, almost forgot to report this, didn't find time to dig into it. You can easily check this with cyclictest: affinity mask set to 2, the test will still schedule on CPU0. Ok, what is needed at skin level to get it to work ? --

Re: [Xenomai-core] [BUG] posix skin thread doesn't respect /proc/xenomai/affinity

2007-10-01 Thread Jan Kiszka
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi Gilles, almost forgot to report this, didn't find time to dig into it. You can easily check this with cyclictest: affinity mask set to 2, the test will still schedule on CPU0. Ok, what is needed at skin level to get it to work ?