Hi,
Please Unsubscribe from this mail chain.
Regards
V. Naresh Kumar
___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core
Naresh Kumar V wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please Unsubscribe from this mail chain.
Simply go to the URL at the bottom of the mail signature, and do it your
self.
--
Gilles.
___
Xenomai-core mailin
Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 01:22:08PM +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Also, about the performances, Xenomai 2.4 did not have the Xenomai
>> preemptible context switches. Maybe with FCSE, it results in reduced
>> latencies to disable this option in Xenomai 2.5.
>
> So, a
On 2011-04-11 08:59, Jesper Christensen wrote:
> There you go.
>
Even better would be individual patches (one for each topic) so that we
can more easily review/merge your improvements into RTnet. If you are
not familiar with this process, maybe you can convince Richard to do the
break-up... :)
A
Yeah we've been stupid enough not to use the version from the git
repository, but i'll see what i can do over the next few days (snowed
under at work :( ). I should be able to do some diffs against the git
repository.
/Jesper
On 2011-04-11 11:18, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-04-11 08:59, Jesper
I have updated to xenomai 2.5.6, but i'm still seeing exceptions
(considerably less often though):
Xenomai: suspending kernel thread b92a39d0 ('tt_upgw_0') at 0xb92a39d0
after exception #1792
/Jesper
On 2011-04-08 15:12, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 14:58 +0200, Jesper Christen
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 16:13 +0200, Jesper Christensen wrote:
> I have updated to xenomai 2.5.6, but i'm still seeing exceptions
> (considerably less often though):
>
> Xenomai: suspending kernel thread b92a39d0 ('tt_upgw_0') at 0xb92a39d0
> after exception #1792
You should build your code statica
Problem is the NIP in question is the address of the thread structure as
seen in the error message.
/Jesper
On 2011-04-11 16:18, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 16:13 +0200, Jesper Christensen wrote:
>
>> I have updated to xenomai 2.5.6, but i'm still seeing exceptions
>> (consi
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 16:18 +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 16:13 +0200, Jesper Christensen wrote:
> > I have updated to xenomai 2.5.6, but i'm still seeing exceptions
> > (considerably less often though):
> >
> > Xenomai: suspending kernel thread b92a39d0 ('tt_upgw_0') at 0xb
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 16:20 +0200, Jesper Christensen wrote:
> Problem is the NIP in question is the address of the thread structure as
> seen in the error message.
LR?
>
> /Jesper
>
>
> On 2011-04-11 16:18, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 16:13 +0200, Jesper Christensen wrote:
How do i see that?
/Jesper
On 2011-04-11 16:27, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 16:20 +0200, Jesper Christensen wrote:
>
>> Problem is the NIP in question is the address of the thread structure as
>> seen in the error message.
>>
> LR?
>
>
>> /Jesper
>>
>>
>> On 2011-04-
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 16:20 +0200, Jesper Christensen wrote:
> Problem is the NIP in question is the address of the thread structure as
> seen in the error message.
>
Is your code spawning -rt kernel threads frequently/periodically, or
only when the application initializes?
> /Jesper
>
>
> On
Only during init:
# cat /proc/xenomai/sched
CPU PIDCLASS PRI TIMEOUT TIMEBASE STAT NAME
0 0 idle-1 - master R ROOT/0
1 0 idle-1 - master R ROOT/1
0 0 rt 98 - master W
Jesper Christensen wrote:
> I have updated to xenomai 2.5.6, but i'm still seeing exceptions
> (considerably less often though):
>
> Xenomai: suspending kernel thread b92a39d0 ('tt_upgw_0') at 0xb92a39d0
> after exception #1792
There was an alignment issue with rtnet on ARM some time ago, which w
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 16:32 +0200, Jesper Christensen wrote:
> How do i see that?
>
diff --git a/include/asm-powerpc/system.h b/include/asm-powerpc/system.h
index 5cc4a23..8dbc537 100644
--- a/include/asm-powerpc/system.h
+++ b/include/asm-powerpc/system.h
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ typedef struct xnarc
I'll just give them a run and see, thanks!
/Jesper
On 2011-04-11 16:39, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 16:32 +0200, Jesper Christensen wrote:
>
>> How do i see that?
>>
>>
> diff --git a/include/asm-powerpc/system.h b/include/asm-powerpc/system.h
> index 5cc4a23..8dbc537
hmm...
Xenomai: suspending kernel thread b911f518 ('rtnet-rtpc') at
nip=0x1088860, lr=0x1088862 after exception #1025
LR points to nowhere...Maybe i should do a hexdump of the stack and
manually decode it.
/Jesper
On 2011-04-11 16:49, Jesper Christensen wrote:
> I'll just give them a run and s
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:34:14AM +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Richard Cochran wrote:
> > I will try xenomai 2.5 with ipipe 2.6.35 next...
I meant to say, Xenomai 2.4 with ipipe 2.6.35, but this does not work
because the kernel definitions have changed:
include/asm-generic/xenomai/hal.h
Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:34:14AM +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Richard Cochran wrote:
>>> I will try xenomai 2.5 with ipipe 2.6.35 next...
>
> I meant to say, Xenomai 2.4 with ipipe 2.6.35, but this does not work
> because the kernel definitions have changed:
>
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:26:33PM +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Wait a minute. You are comparing results obtained after 2 or 3, or 10
> minutes of runtime? I am not sure such results are meaningful. I do my
> benchmarks with the noltp_hell test:
> http://git.xenomai.org/?p=mkrootfs.git;a=bl
20 matches
Mail list logo
