Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > The attached version of the patch do that.
>
> Fine with me, please merge as you see fit. Details follow:
>
> > +++ include/nucleus/ppd.h 2006-05-10 14:27:11.0 +0200
> > @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> > +#i
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > The attached version of the patch do that.
>
> Fine with me, please merge as you see fit. Details follow:
>
> > +++ include/nucleus/ppd.h 2006-05-10 14:27:11.0 +0200
> > @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> > +#ifndef PPD_H
> > +#define PPD_
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
The attached version of the patch do that.
Fine with me, please merge as you see fit. Details follow:
+++ include/nucleus/ppd.h 2006-05-10 14:27:11.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+#ifndef PPD_H
+#define PPD_H
+
Given that ppds are shadow-specific, I would
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > Philippe Gerum wrote:
> > > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > > > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > > > > These patches are not ready for inclusion, they are not tested
> > > > > yet.
> > > >
> > > > The attached versions are test
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > > These patches are not ready for inclusion, they are not tested
> > > yet.
> >
> > The attached versions are tested. I still wonder if handling this in
> > shadow.c is t
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > > These patches are not ready for inclusion, they are not tested
> > > yet.
> >
> > The attached versions are tested. I still wonder if handling this in
> > shadow.c is the right solution, or if there
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> These patches are not ready for inclusion, they are not tested
> yet.
The attached versions are tested. I still wonder if handling this in
shadow.c is the right solution, or if there should be an xnppd_set call
that could be called from
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > These patches are not ready for inclusion, they are not tested
> > yet.
>
> The attached versions are tested.
...but the kernel patch is buggy. Here are the corrected versions.
--
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > Likely I did not yet get the full picture: What prevents using another
> > adeos per-task key for this?
>
> We would need a per-task key for every skin that needs a per-process
> data,
Not necessarily, we could attach a chain of per-skin data
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> These patches are not ready for inclusion, they are not tested
> yet.
The attached versions are tested. I still wonder if handling this in
shadow.c is the right solution, or if there should be an xnppd_set call
that could be called from within the skins event callba
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> On 08/05/06, Gilles Chanteperdrix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > > Likely I did not yet get the full picture: What prevents using another
> > > adeos per-task key for this?
> >
> > We would need a per-task key for every skin that needs a per-p
On 08/05/06, Gilles Chanteperdrix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Likely I did not yet get the full picture: What prevents using another
> adeos per-task key for this?
We would need a per-task key for every skin that needs a per-process
data, but more importantly, we would need
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Likely I did not yet get the full picture: What prevents using another
> adeos per-task key for this?
We would need a per-task key for every skin that needs a per-process
data, but more importantly, we would need to track the clone syscalls
(that would be another adeos event
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for review, here are patches that provide Xenomai skins with a
> per-process per-skin data structures. It will allow skins to do
> per-process cleanup for example, or the posix skin to maintain a
> per-process signal mask.
That sounds promising!
>
> In orde
Hi,
for review, here are patches that provide Xenomai skins with a
per-process per-skin data structures. It will allow skins to do
per-process cleanup for example, or the posix skin to maintain a
per-process signal mask.
In order to use it, the skins must pass an eventcb function to the
xnshadow
15 matches
Mail list logo
