Dear Gilles,
In message <4ac5f4ec.6040...@xenomai.org> you wrote:
>
> > Let's hope the patch gets picked up and maintained by
> > the kernel developers. If not, will Xenomai keep supporting it for
> > upcoming kernels?
>
> Yes, definitely.
I have created a "arm-fcse" branch in our linux-2.6-den
Henri Roosen wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
>
> We are using the FCSE on our at91sam9263 boards because we need the
> lowest latency. Our measurements show almost a factor of 2 in latency
> reduction, which is very similar to what you presented at the XUM.
Good to know.
>
> Are there any known issues with
Hi Gilles,
We are using the FCSE on our at91sam9263 boards because we need the
lowest latency. Our measurements show almost a factor of 2 in latency
reduction, which is very similar to what you presented at the XUM.
Are there any known issues with FCSE at the moment as included for the
2.6.28 ker
Hi,
for those interested into the FCSE patch, as told in the paper presented
to the XUM (but that is a detail which I forgot to mention in the
presentation), the FCSE patch was split into several parts (10 actually)
and submitted to the linux arm kernel mailing list.
You may find the post here:
