Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] Don't call __ipipe_mach_set_dec in rthal_timer_release directly

Sebastian Smolorz wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Sebastian Smolorz wrote: Hi, here's a proposal for a minor change in the I-pipe implementation for ARM. Since it is required for my S3C24xx patch not to call __ipipe_mach_set_dec directly when the timer is released by the Xenomai domain I

Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] Don't call __ipipe_mach_set_dec in rthal_timer_release directly

Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Sebastian Smolorz wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Sebastian Smolorz wrote: Hi, here's a proposal for a minor change in the I-pipe implementation for ARM. Since it is required for my S3C24xx patch not to call __ipipe_mach_set_dec directly when the timer is

Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] Don't call __ipipe_mach_set_dec in rthal_timer_release directly

Sebastian Smolorz wrote: Hi, here's a proposal for a minor change in the I-pipe implementation for ARM. Since it is required for my S3C24xx patch not to call __ipipe_mach_set_dec directly when the timer is released by the Xenomai domain I suggest the following changes. The patch