Jan Kiszka wrote:
Jim Cromie wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jim Cromie wrote:
I hope thats everything for now,
it needs a good shakedown, and I need a beer.
Eh, I hope you had it by now, otherwise, you must be so damn
thirsty... :o>
:-) Ya gotta try this - sim
Jim Cromie wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>> Jim Cromie wrote:
>>> I hope thats everything for now,
>>> it needs a good shakedown, and I need a beer.
>>>
>>
>> Eh, I hope you had it by now, otherwise, you must be so damn
>> thirsty... :o>
>>
> :-) Ya gotta try this - simple, but highly addictive.
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jim Cromie wrote:
cycletest now has decent options passed in.
I havent given any thought to exposing options thru xeno-test's
command line.
Instead, Im thinking of adding statistics, ala latency.
for that, Im also pondering a new -g 100 option to group the tests
for st
Jim Cromie wrote:
Jim Cromie wrote:
Ive started adding to xeno-test, as outlined previously (plus some)
, except where noted
- now run cyclictest and switch, in addition to latency -t 0,1,2
cycletest now has decent options passed in.
I havent given any thought to exposing options thru x
