Fillod Stephane wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
[..]
The last significant change between -00 and -01 is actually the one related to
the fork pressure (others are cosmetic ones aimed at better sharing stuff with
the blackfin port). The patch below against -02 removes it.
Here is the result of t
Philippe Gerum wrote:
[..]
>The last significant change between -00 and -01 is actually the one related to
>the fork pressure (others are cosmetic ones aimed at better sharing stuff with
>the blackfin port). The patch below against -02 removes it.
Here is the result of tests with version 1.0-02+
Fillod Stephane wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
[..]
http://download.gna.org/adeos/patches/v2.6/adeos/ppc/adeos-ipipe-2.6.13-
ppc-1.0-02.patch
Here is the result of tests with version 1.0-02 on e500:
load: ~1 minute ping -f, one run of calibrator chewing 64MiB.
$ cat /proc/ipipe/version
1.0-02
Philippe Gerum wrote:
[..]
>
http://download.gna.org/adeos/patches/v2.6/adeos/ppc/adeos-ipipe-2.6.13-
ppc-1.0-02.patch
Here is the result of tests with version 1.0-02 on e500:
load: ~1 minute ping -f, one run of calibrator chewing 64MiB.
$ cat /proc/ipipe/version
1.0-02
SWITCH without load:
RTH
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Fillod Stephane wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
[...]
Load for klatency/latency was ping flooding on FCC (piece of cake),
and cache calibrator. IMHO, we can do nastier.
You mean the cache calibrator from http://monetdb.cwi.nl/Calibrator/? I
tried it on my Ocotea boa
Fillod Stephane wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
[...]
Load for klatency/latency was ping flooding on FCC (piece of cake),
and cache calibrator. IMHO, we can do nastier.
You mean the cache calibrator from http://monetdb.cwi.nl/Calibrator/? I
tried it on my Ocotea board and it increased the m
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
[...]
>> Load for klatency/latency was ping flooding on FCC (piece of cake),
>> and cache calibrator. IMHO, we can do nastier.
>
>You mean the cache calibrator from http://monetdb.cwi.nl/Calibrator/? I
>tried it on my Ocotea board and it increased the max latency for 25 t
On 10/17/2005 05:42 PM Fillod Stephane wrote:
> Hi Philippe,
>
> Sorry for the late report, Xenomai appears to work fine on a Freescale
> e500
> board (MPC8541E) under Linux 2.6.13. Xenomai version was v1.9.9, ie. the
> daily
> snapshot as of today. Here are some preliminary figures (CPU 800MHz, B
Fillod Stephane wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
[..]
The last significant change between -00 and -01 is actually the one related to
the fork pressure (others are cosmetic ones aimed at better sharing stuff with
the blackfin port). The patch below against -02 removes it.
Here is the result of t
Philippe Gerum wrote:
[..]
>The last significant change between -00 and -01 is actually the one related to
>the fork pressure (others are cosmetic ones aimed at better sharing stuff with
>the blackfin port). The patch below against -02 removes it.
Here is the result of tests with version 1.0-02+
Fillod Stephane wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
[..]
http://download.gna.org/adeos/patches/v2.6/adeos/ppc/adeos-ipipe-2.6.13-
ppc-1.0-02.patch
Here is the result of tests with version 1.0-02 on e500:
load: ~1 minute ping -f, one run of calibrator chewing 64MiB.
$ cat /proc/ipipe/version
1.0-02
Philippe Gerum wrote:
[..]
>
http://download.gna.org/adeos/patches/v2.6/adeos/ppc/adeos-ipipe-2.6.13-
ppc-1.0-02.patch
Here is the result of tests with version 1.0-02 on e500:
load: ~1 minute ping -f, one run of calibrator chewing 64MiB.
$ cat /proc/ipipe/version
1.0-02
SWITCH without load:
RTH
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Fillod Stephane wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
[...]
Load for klatency/latency was ping flooding on FCC (piece of cake),
and cache calibrator. IMHO, we can do nastier.
You mean the cache calibrator from http://monetdb.cwi.nl/Calibrator/? I
tried it on my Ocotea boa
Fillod Stephane wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
[...]
Load for klatency/latency was ping flooding on FCC (piece of cake),
and cache calibrator. IMHO, we can do nastier.
You mean the cache calibrator from http://monetdb.cwi.nl/Calibrator/? I
tried it on my Ocotea board and it increased the m
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
[...]
>> Load for klatency/latency was ping flooding on FCC (piece of cake),
>> and cache calibrator. IMHO, we can do nastier.
>
>You mean the cache calibrator from http://monetdb.cwi.nl/Calibrator/? I
>tried it on my Ocotea board and it increased the max latency for 25 t
On 10/17/2005 05:42 PM Fillod Stephane wrote:
> Hi Philippe,
>
> Sorry for the late report, Xenomai appears to work fine on a Freescale
> e500
> board (MPC8541E) under Linux 2.6.13. Xenomai version was v1.9.9, ie. the
> daily
> snapshot as of today. Here are some preliminary figures (CPU 800MHz, B
On 10/17/2005 05:42 PM Fillod Stephane wrote:
> Hi Philippe,
>
> Sorry for the late report, Xenomai appears to work fine on a Freescale
> e500
> board (MPC8541E) under Linux 2.6.13. Xenomai version was v1.9.9, ie. the
> daily
> snapshot as of today. Here are some preliminary figures (CPU 800MHz, B
On 10/17/2005 05:42 PM Fillod Stephane wrote:
> Hi Philippe,
>
> Sorry for the late report, Xenomai appears to work fine on a Freescale
> e500
> board (MPC8541E) under Linux 2.6.13. Xenomai version was v1.9.9, ie. the
> daily
> snapshot as of today. Here are some preliminary figures (CPU 800MHz, B
Fillod Stephane wrote:
Hi Philippe,
Sorry for the late report, Xenomai appears to work fine on a Freescale
e500
board (MPC8541E) under Linux 2.6.13. Xenomai version was v1.9.9, ie. the
daily
snapshot as of today. Here are some preliminary figures (CPU 800MHz, Bus
133MHz,
32 kiB I-Cache 32 kiB D
Hi Philippe,
Sorry for the late report, Xenomai appears to work fine on a Freescale
e500
board (MPC8541E) under Linux 2.6.13. Xenomai version was v1.9.9, ie. the
daily
snapshot as of today. Here are some preliminary figures (CPU 800MHz, Bus
133MHz,
32 kiB I-Cache 32 kiB D-Cache, 256 kiB L2):
swi
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
On 10/15/2005 09:17 PM Heikki Lindholm wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger kirjoitti:
Hello Philippe,
I got Xenomai working on a Ocotea-Board (AMCC 440GX) and a low-end
TQM855L-Module (MPC 855) under Linux 2.6.14-rc3 :-). The patch applied
with a few hunks and one easy to f
On 10/15/2005 09:17 PM Heikki Lindholm wrote:
> Wolfgang Grandegger kirjoitti:
>> Hello Philippe,
>>
>> I got Xenomai working on a Ocotea-Board (AMCC 440GX) and a low-end
>> TQM855L-Module (MPC 855) under Linux 2.6.14-rc3 :-). The patch applied
>> with a few hunks and one easy to fix reject and I
Wolfgang Grandegger kirjoitti:
Hello Philippe,
I got Xenomai working on a Ocotea-Board (AMCC 440GX) and a low-end
TQM855L-Module (MPC 855) under Linux 2.6.14-rc3 :-). The patch applied
with a few hunks and one easy to fix reject and I had to correct two
problems. One with FEW_CONTEXT (see attach
23 matches
Mail list logo
