Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> On 12/08/11 10:18, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>> On 12/08/11 01:18, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> The following patch seems to do the trick. It makes the assumption that
>>> when compiling with -fomit-frame-pointer, we have one more register, so
>>> the "R" constraint will
On 12/08/11 10:18, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> On 12/08/11 01:18, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> The following patch seems to do the trick. It makes the assumption that
>> when compiling with -fomit-frame-pointer, we have one more register, so
>> the "R" constraint will always be able to avoid choos
Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> On 12/08/11 01:18, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> The following patch seems to do the trick. It makes the assumption that
>> when compiling with -fomit-frame-pointer, we have one more register, so
>> the "R" constraint will always be able to avoid choosing eax, and eax
>>
On 12/08/11 01:18, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> The following patch seems to do the trick. It makes the assumption that
> when compiling with -fomit-frame-pointer, we have one more register, so
> the "R" constraint will always be able to avoid choosing eax, and eax
> will be free for the muxcode
On 08/11/2011 10:52 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 08/11/2011 07:31 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 08/11/2011 07:21 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 08/11/2011 04:48 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
I compiled linux 2.6.38.8 and xenomai-head with gcc-4.6. The obtained
k
On 08/11/2011 07:31 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 08/11/2011 07:21 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 08/11/2011 04:48 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>>> I compiled linux 2.6.38.8 and xenomai-head with gcc-4.6. The obtained
>>> kernel boots fine but xenomai services do not: latency hangs
On 08/11/2011 08:42 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> On 11/08/11 19:22, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>
>> Please try and find the point in the latency test where the hang happens
>> (it probably happens when calling a xenomai service, so, not
>> sched_setscheduler), and then post the two disassemblies
On 08/11/2011 07:31 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 08/11/2011 07:21 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 08/11/2011 04:48 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>>> I compiled linux 2.6.38.8 and xenomai-head with gcc-4.6. The obtained
>>> kernel boots fine but xenomai services do not: latency hangs
On 11/08/11 19:22, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Please try and find the point in the latency test where the hang happens
> (it probably happens when calling a xenomai service, so, not
> sched_setscheduler), and then post the two disassemblies of this service
> implementation in libnative.so, the
On 08/11/2011 07:21 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 08/11/2011 04:48 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>> I compiled linux 2.6.38.8 and xenomai-head with gcc-4.6. The obtained
>> kernel boots fine but xenomai services do not: latency hangs right after
>> the sched_setscheduler system call. With th
On 08/11/2011 04:48 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> On 11/08/11 13:43, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>> I submitted the debian bug, beside what is the cause of the problem,
>> binaries compiled with gcc-4.6 are not usable, but binaries compiled
>> with gcc-4.4 are. I'm compiling xenomai-head right now (thi
Hi,
On 08/11/2011 04:48 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> I compiled linux 2.6.38.8 and xenomai-head with gcc-4.6. The obtained
> kernel boots fine but xenomai services do not: latency hangs right after
> the sched_setscheduler system call. With the same kernel I compiled user
> space with gcc-4.4 and
On 11/08/11 13:43, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> I submitted the debian bug, beside what is the cause of the problem,
> binaries compiled with gcc-4.6 are not usable, but binaries compiled
> with gcc-4.4 are. I'm compiling xenomai-head right now (this requires
> compiling both user space and kernel spa
On 11/08/11 13:07, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 08/11/2011 12:59 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I remember the recent gcc 4.6 issue on this list, but unfortunately,
>> didn't have much time for attention. Now, it found its way to the Debian
>> package: http://bugs.debian.org/637425
>>
>>
On 08/11/2011 12:59 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I remember the recent gcc 4.6 issue on this list, but unfortunately,
> didn't have much time for attention. Now, it found its way to the Debian
> package: http://bugs.debian.org/637425
>
> I wonder if it is a compiler bug or Xenomai's.
It lo
15 matches
Mail list logo