CVS Update: xc (branch: trunk)

CVSROOT:/home/x-cvs Module name:xc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/09/18 12:01:33 Log message: Add a CAVEATS section, describing what happens exactly. Modified files: xc/programs/xkill/: xkill.man Revision ChangesPath 1.9 +8 -1

CVS Update: xc (branch: trunk)

CVSROOT:/home/x-cvs Module name:xc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/09/18 12:31:50 Log message: Fix libGL bug that could cause deadlock when switching contexts (John Harper). Modified files: xc/lib/GL/glx/: glxext.c xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/:

Running XtAppMainLoop in a thread

I have an X application I wrote using gcc-2.96-85 on RedHat 7.0. I've upgraded to gcc-3.3.1 on RedHat 9 (XFree 4.3.0). I'm running into some strange behaviors in the new version. - the window does not refresh when uncovered - the mouse callbacks are disabled - Ctrl-C

C version of ucs2any.pl

Hi, It seems to me that the C langage version of ucs2any.pl developped by Ben Collver and other NetBSD developpers is now stable enough to be included in XFree86. I've put a patch against the current XFree86 CVS version at http://www.xfree86.org/~herrb/ucs2any.diffs for those who'd like to

Re: C version of ucs2any.pl

Matthieu, I appreciate the notification in advance of committing something like this. I am doing a build test right now on Cygwin. I will let you know if I find any problems. Harold Matthieu Herrb wrote: Hi, It seems to me that the C langage version of ucs2any.pl developped by Ben Collver

Re: C version of ucs2any.pl

Matthieu, I found two things: 1) In ucs2any.c the libgen.h header is included only to provide basename, while a local definition of basename is provided for those platforms that don't have it. However, libgen.h is still included even on those platforms that define NEED_BASENAME. Thus, the

[XFree86] X don't start

Hi, On my machine the X starting normally with 128MB of RAM or less, but with more 128MB of RAM the X don't starting. The log file is attached. What's happening? Thanks, Erivan Teresina-PI __ Acabe com aquelas janelinhas

[XFree86] clarification about mergedfb and radeon cards

Just to clarify: Is mergedfb support for Radeon cards built in to snapshots = 4.3.99.10, or do the snapshots still need to be patched??? Thanks! ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86

Re: [XFree86] Ati drivers (DRI) slow

I attach the XFree86.log, my config is : - P4 2GHz - Ati Fire GL 9000 - Kernel 2.4.22 - Xfree 4.3.0-r3 - Xfree-drm 4.3.0-r6 I run a Gentoo ~x86 I have test with glxgears, with the ATI drivers I run 6x more than the DRI drivers With the DRI drivers when I page-up page-down on vi, my CPU goes

Re: [XFree86] Can't start X - errors

I read that DRM should not be enabled in the 2,4 kernels. Should it? If there are any specific things that should be in the kernel, please tell me what they are. TIA, Harold On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 17:35, Mark Vojkovich wrote: It sounds more like he's just got a minimally compiled kernel without

Re: [XFree86] Can't start X - errors

Hi harold, I would suggest a reinstallation. Looks like you have a minimal installation of Linux on your system. Its always wise to install the entire operating system in the first go and then remove those files that aren't necessary later. Satej I read that DRM should not be enabled in the

[XFree86] Selectively rebuild the i740 driver only?

Dear all, I'm having some problems with the i740 driver (BUG# 21). The bug tracking now says that the patch has been commited to the CVS. So I'd like to get the fixed driver from the CVS. I'm running RedHat 9 with XFree86-4.3.0-2 RPM. I did `cvs checkout -r xf-4_3-branch xc` and now am facing

Re: [XFree86] very bad mistake

It sounds like it's just a change to root's .xinitrc or something like that's causing startx to not work. Check the modification dates of the hidden files in /root. Mark. On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, jared ailene wrote: Aloha again, With some welcome help from several

[XFree86] Problem with virtual mode operation

Please pardon a question from a relative newbie. I'm putting together a small computer to attach to my television. I'm using a VIA EPIA motherboard (VT8601A North Bridge with integrated video). I've setup X to run at 640x480x16bpp. Everything works fine. No issues. Since 640x480 is a bit

[XFree86] A problem about my X installation

Dear Sir or Madam: Sorry to trouble you. I have installed the redhat and suse in my desktop, but there is a display problem about my Monitor: I can only enter into the X by 640x480 with 16 depth. If I config it into 1024x768(with 16 depth) in XF86config and then type startx, the

[XFree86] The problem with starting Xwindow in Linux Guest OS--Vmware 4.0+vmware tools+Redhat9.0(or Redhat AS)

Good Day, Following is my XFree86.log please help, Thank you in advance!! XFree86 Version 4.1.0 (Red Hat Linux release: 4.1.0-46) / X Window System (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6510) Release

[XFree86] RE: XFree86 error

Hi, Sir, This is Jason. This afternoon I ran into X window configuration problem when I attempted to install Redhat 9.0 in HP Kayak XU800 machine. Please see the attached log file. In my initial installation, I did not select X11 package except Gnome. The installation was successful. But

Re: [XFree86] Can't start X - errors

On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 13:40, Satej Ankolekar wrote: Hi harold, I would suggest a reinstallation. Looks like you have a minimal installation of Linux on your system. Its always wise to install the entire operating system in the first go and then remove those files that aren't necessary

[XFree86] (no subject)

nesecito controlador neomagic nm2097

[XFree86] (no subject)

Sir, I am Nitin. I have RH Linux 9.0 on my machine. I am facing a problem. The GUI is not coming up. I deleted all the directories and files from /tmp directory. And since then I am facing this problem. I am attaching XFree86.0.log. Please give a solution so that I can bring my GUI up again.