It's=20***ING=20outlook
David
=20-Original=20Message-
=20From:=20Michael=20Harrington=20[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=20Sent:=2002=20April=202004=2002:56
=20To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=20Subject:=20[xmail]=20Re:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Set outlook to send as plain text only !
-- Chris L. Franklin --
- Original Message -
From: David Stebbings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 4:03 AM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Default Open Relay @ Davide
It's=20***ING=20outlook
David
=20-Original
It=20***ing=20is!=20:)
David
=20-Original=20Message-
=20From:=20Chris=20L.=20Franklin=20[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=20Sent:=2002=20April=202004=2011:56
=20To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=20Subject:=20[xmail]=20Re:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=20
=20
=20Set=20outlook=20to=20send=20as=20plain=20text=20only=20!
I guess I'm not trying to stifle it, but like everyone here, I have my =
opinions.
I do have to ask how many times does Davide have to say no before people =
realize that he's not going to make the change? People may not be being =
ungrateful, but beating this dead horse isn't going to make him
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Dale Qualls [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: donderdag 1 april 2004 15:54
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Default Open Relay @ Davide
I guess I'm not trying to stifle it, but like everyone here, I have my =
=3D
opinions.
I do have to ask how many times
- Original Message -
From: Wim Verveen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 4:51 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Default Open Relay @ Davide
If open source just means ' please shut up' than closed source would be
a much better alternative. I think
]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 4:51 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Default Open Relay @ Davide
If open source just means ' please shut up' than closed source would be
a much better alternative. I think that as a maintainer you should
listen to the people using the software. This does not mean doing
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: donderdag 1 april 2004 17:37
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Default Open Relay @ Davide
=20
Complainers,
=20
I do not usually get into these debates, but I know how=20
hard it is developing little pieces of software here and=20
there. So I can only
this thread and let the MAN work -=20
what he does best.
Matic
- Original Message -
From: Wim Verveen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 4:51 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Default Open Relay @ Davide
=20
If open source just means ' please shut
: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 8:59 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Default Open Relay @ Davide
rant
Okay, color me stupid, but is it so tough to empty the darned
smtprelay.tab=
file?
I'm amazed at everyone bitching over a great product that no one pays any
=
money for.
I agree that spam is an issue, I
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Shiloh Jennings wrote:
This is the same thing we all asked Microsoft to do with IIS.
You seem to forget that MS (note not $ but S) has quite a few ppl for tech
support, and users do not send emails directly to billg when something
does not work as they expected. Anyway,
At 10:54 4/1/2004, you wrote:
Why ship an email server as an open relay? There is no valid reason.
I don't mean to be rude, nor to step on anyone's toes, but... Are you
willing to answer the flood of email resulting from people downloading the
product and not being able to figure out why they
My=20twopenneth=20to=20the=20open=20relay=20debate=20:)
If=20I=20was=20writing=20XMail=20i=20would=20make=20private=20addresses=20=
(as=20suggested=20previously)=20open=20relays=20(i.e.=2010.x,=20192.x=20an=
d=20172.x)=20and=20everything=20else=20restricted.
At 11:02 4/1/2004, you wrote:
I also created a new
distribution list [EMAIL PROTECTED] where I will forward all
messages coming from lame users, and your addresses are already subscribed
:-)
If this is not simply humor, you can add me to that list. I'm not an expert
in every setting or option
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Tracy wrote:
If this is not simply humor, you can add me to that list. I'm not an expert
in every setting or option (not by far) but I can certainly handle the
basics of configuration.
It was a joke ;) Actually, since it's Apr 1, I could have done better :-)
- Davide
Me too, davide.
ben
Tracy wrote:
At 11:02 4/1/2004, you wrote:
I also created a new
distribution list [EMAIL PROTECTED] where I will forward all
messages coming from lame users, and your addresses are already subscribed
:-)
If this is not simply humor, you can add me to that list.
Damnit! I forgot about fools day!!! Yeah, you should have said 2.0 is
out! hahaha
Maybe not funny at first, but we would have seen the humor.
Ben
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Tracy wrote:
If this is not simply humor, you can add me to that list. I'm not an expert
in every
Is anyone else getting all of these =3D20?
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =
On
Behalf Of David Stebbings
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 8:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Default Open Relay @ Davide
My=3D20twopenneth=3D20to
Yup...you're not seeing things. :-)
Is anyone else getting all of these =3D20?
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =
On
Behalf Of David Stebbings
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 8:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Default
Yes
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of M Jenck
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 1:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Default Open Relay @ Davide
Is anyone else getting all of these =3D20?
Mike
-Original
A Hex Markup in MIME :) Someone needs to fix their parser :)
- Original Message -
From: Michael Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 5:05 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Default Open Relay @ Davide
Yes
-Original Message-
From
Hello Davide,
I read your opinion regarding this issue and read the whole thread.
I strongly agree with the fact that it should be a closed relay by default (as most
people obviously do), we all should be doing everything we can to decrease the
ever-growing plague that is spam! However, I also
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Orion Productions wrote:
I really hope you'll reconsider your decision! :-)
I did
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
rant
Okay, color me stupid, but is it so tough to empty the darned smtprelay.tab=
file?
I'm amazed at everyone bitching over a great product that no one pays any =
money for.
I agree that spam is an issue, I block over a million pieces a month, but =
for pete's sake people need to take a
On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 12:59, Dale Qualls wrote:
Okay, color me stupid, but is it so tough to empty the darned smtprelay.tab=
file?
no - but I agree it's easy to miss. Even if it was left the way it was
and there was a file named IMPORTANT.txt in the root directory of the
archive that would
25 matches
Mail list logo
