On [Thu, 03.06. 14:43], alex wrote:
Tracy wrote:
At 08:22 6/3/2004, you wrote:
This is a CRAZY idea !
In a few time you have banned 50% or more of internet traffic !
alex wrote:
It's actually not a crazy idea, because a very large percentage of the
virus traffic on the
On [Mon, 07.06. 08:05], alex wrote:
On Jun 7, 2004, at 12:24 AM, Wim Verveen wrote:
I am actually trying this out. It doesn't catch a lot until now. Maybe
the database needs to grow or more 'points of measurement' are needed?
I think they need more points of measurement, the database
Goesta Smekal wrote:
I do a similar thing for two months : Every mail reportet to be infected gets a
second treatment:
* look for originating IP (of SMTP envelope, _not_ headers)
* resolve its domain
* get the MX for that domain
* if the IPs are not equal, block the host, since it is an
Luckily I am located in the same country as this particular list. It
seems to get better though. I do agree that to work better the list
needs more input both locally and around the world.
wim=20
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Goesta
At 03:09 6/11/2004, Goesta Smekal wrote:
I do a similar thing for two months : Every mail reportet to be infected
gets a
second treatment:
* look for originating IP (of SMTP envelope, _not_ headers)
* resolve its domain
* get the MX for that domain
* if the IPs are not equal, block the host,
Hi Davide,
the same situation happened again. Now I have gathered all the data, I hope
it would help to find the problem.
To remind the situation: one e-mail sent to the mailing list causes
sometimes that several messages to mailing list users are multiplicated
inside the XMail queue into
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Adrian Hicks
Sent: Friday, 11 June 2004 1:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] smtp connection problems
-snip-
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] adrianh]$ telnet merlin 25 Trying 202.42.186.82...
Connected to
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Liron Newman wrote:
Goesta Smekal wrote:
I do a similar thing for two months : Every mail reportet to be infected gets a
second treatment:
* look for originating IP (of SMTP envelope, _not_ headers)
* resolve its domain
* get the MX for that domain
* if the IPs
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Rob Arends wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Adrian Hicks
Sent: Friday, 11 June 2004 1:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] smtp connection problems
-snip-
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] adrianh]$
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Roman Dusek wrote:
Hi Davide,
the same situation happened again. Now I have gathered all the data, I hope
it would help to find the problem.
To remind the situation: one e-mail sent to the mailing list causes
sometimes that several messages to mailing list users
I am tring to setup xmail as my pop3 server.
I have created a domain called italycomnet.it and some users inside.
I can access the pop3 server using outlook. So I think the domain and user
configuration is fine.
The server send correctly the mail.
The server respond to a telnet request at port
This conversation seems to have died - but is important.
How many of us currently use:
\domain\mailproc.tab
How many of us currently use:
\user\mailproc.tab
For those that do - please comment on this thread. I beleive the logic in
the present mail.proc is less usable than it could be. Your
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Rosario Pingaro wrote:
I am tring to setup xmail as my pop3 server.
I have created a domain called italycomnet.it and some users inside.
I can access the pop3 server using outlook. So I think the domain and user
configuration is fine.
The server send correctly the
Hello,
=20
This conversation seems to have died - but is important.
How many of us currently use:
\domain\mailproc.tab
How many of us currently use:
\user\mailproc.tab
=20
For those that do - please comment on this thread. I=20
beleive the logic in
the present mail.proc is less usable
mailbox line in domain mailproc.tab would be the logical Stop as it
delievers the mail. If no mailbox line found in domain mailproc.tab, then
continue processing with user mail.proc.tab.
Any one else?
- Original Message -
From: Manuel Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone with any insight into what missing dependancy this error is referring
to:
g++ -o bin/MkMachDep MkMachDep.o -lkvm -pthread -lc_r
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lc_r
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
gmake: *** [bin/MkMachDep] Error 1
Thanks,
- Ken
-- Binary/unsupported file stripped by
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Ken Larkman wrote:
Anyone with any insight into what missing dependancy this error is referring
to:
g++ -o bin/MkMachDep MkMachDep.o -lkvm -pthread -lc_r
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lc_r
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
gmake: *** [bin/MkMachDep] Error 1
Try to remove
I use user mailproc and I would love to use domain mailproc too in
addition to that (In a way that is unsupported now).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This conversation seems to have died - but is important.
How many of us currently use:
\domain\mailproc.tab
How many of us currently use:
18 matches
Mail list logo