[xmail] Re: virus database

2004-06-11 Thread Goesta Smekal
On [Thu, 03.06. 14:43], alex wrote: Tracy wrote: At 08:22 6/3/2004, you wrote: This is a CRAZY idea ! In a few time you have banned 50% or more of internet traffic ! alex wrote: It's actually not a crazy idea, because a very large percentage of the virus traffic on the

[xmail] Re: virus database

2004-06-11 Thread Goesta Smekal
On [Mon, 07.06. 08:05], alex wrote: On Jun 7, 2004, at 12:24 AM, Wim Verveen wrote: I am actually trying this out. It doesn't catch a lot until now. Maybe the database needs to grow or more 'points of measurement' are needed? I think they need more points of measurement, the database

[xmail] Re: virus database

2004-06-11 Thread Liron Newman
Goesta Smekal wrote: I do a similar thing for two months : Every mail reportet to be infected gets a second treatment: * look for originating IP (of SMTP envelope, _not_ headers) * resolve its domain * get the MX for that domain * if the IPs are not equal, block the host, since it is an

[xmail] Re: virus database

2004-06-11 Thread Wim Verveen
Luckily I am located in the same country as this particular list. It seems to get better though. I do agree that to work better the list needs more input both locally and around the world. wim=20 -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Goesta

[xmail] Re: virus database

2004-06-11 Thread Tracy
At 03:09 6/11/2004, Goesta Smekal wrote: I do a similar thing for two months : Every mail reportet to be infected gets a second treatment: * look for originating IP (of SMTP envelope, _not_ headers) * resolve its domain * get the MX for that domain * if the IPs are not equal, block the host,

[xmail] email to mailing list delivered several times

2004-06-11 Thread Roman Dusek
Hi Davide, the same situation happened again. Now I have gathered all the data, I hope it would help to find the problem. To remind the situation: one e-mail sent to the mailing list causes sometimes that several messages to mailing list users are multiplicated inside the XMail queue into

[xmail] Re: smtp connection problems

2004-06-11 Thread Rob Arends
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Hicks Sent: Friday, 11 June 2004 1:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] smtp connection problems -snip- - [EMAIL PROTECTED] adrianh]$ telnet merlin 25 Trying 202.42.186.82... Connected to

[xmail] Re: virus database

2004-06-11 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Liron Newman wrote: Goesta Smekal wrote: I do a similar thing for two months : Every mail reportet to be infected gets a second treatment: * look for originating IP (of SMTP envelope, _not_ headers) * resolve its domain * get the MX for that domain * if the IPs

[xmail] Re: smtp connection problems

2004-06-11 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Rob Arends wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Hicks Sent: Friday, 11 June 2004 1:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] smtp connection problems -snip- - [EMAIL PROTECTED] adrianh]$

[xmail] Re: email to mailing list delivered several times

2004-06-11 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Roman Dusek wrote: Hi Davide, the same situation happened again. Now I have gathered all the data, I hope it would help to find the problem. To remind the situation: one e-mail sent to the mailing list causes sometimes that several messages to mailing list users

[xmail] problem seting up the xmail server

2004-06-11 Thread Rosario Pingaro
I am tring to setup xmail as my pop3 server. I have created a domain called italycomnet.it and some users inside. I can access the pop3 server using outlook. So I think the domain and user configuration is fine. The server send correctly the mail. The server respond to a telnet request at port

[xmail] Re: Domain mailproc

2004-06-11 Thread tonys
This conversation seems to have died - but is important. How many of us currently use: \domain\mailproc.tab How many of us currently use: \user\mailproc.tab For those that do - please comment on this thread. I beleive the logic in the present mail.proc is less usable than it could be. Your

[xmail] Re: problem seting up the xmail server

2004-06-11 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Rosario Pingaro wrote: I am tring to setup xmail as my pop3 server. I have created a domain called italycomnet.it and some users inside. I can access the pop3 server using outlook. So I think the domain and user configuration is fine. The server send correctly the

[xmail] Re: Domain mailproc

2004-06-11 Thread Manuel Martin
Hello, =20 This conversation seems to have died - but is important. How many of us currently use: \domain\mailproc.tab How many of us currently use: \user\mailproc.tab =20 For those that do - please comment on this thread. I=20 beleive the logic in the present mail.proc is less usable

[xmail] Re: Domain mailproc

2004-06-11 Thread tonys
mailbox line in domain mailproc.tab would be the logical Stop as it delievers the mail. If no mailbox line found in domain mailproc.tab, then continue processing with user mail.proc.tab. Any one else? - Original Message - From: Manuel Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[xmail] Compiling Xmail on OpenBSD 3.4

2004-06-11 Thread Ken Larkman
Anyone with any insight into what missing dependancy this error is referring to: g++ -o bin/MkMachDep MkMachDep.o -lkvm -pthread -lc_r /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lc_r collect2: ld returned 1 exit status gmake: *** [bin/MkMachDep] Error 1 Thanks, - Ken -- Binary/unsupported file stripped by

[xmail] Re: Compiling Xmail on OpenBSD 3.4

2004-06-11 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Ken Larkman wrote: Anyone with any insight into what missing dependancy this error is referring to: g++ -o bin/MkMachDep MkMachDep.o -lkvm -pthread -lc_r /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lc_r collect2: ld returned 1 exit status gmake: *** [bin/MkMachDep] Error 1 Try to remove

[xmail] Re: Domain mailproc

2004-06-11 Thread Liron Newman
I use user mailproc and I would love to use domain mailproc too in addition to that (In a way that is unsupported now). [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This conversation seems to have died - but is important. How many of us currently use: \domain\mailproc.tab How many of us currently use: