hi all,
um, I tried RTFM'ng but where can i see xmail related error messages? I cant
find it in /var/log/messages...
thanks
-
Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thursday, September 08, 2005 11:56
AM:
um, I tried RTFM'ng but where can i see xmail related error
messages? I cant find it in /var/log/messages...
1. Enable logging via command lind switches:
http://www.xmailserver.org/Readme.html#command_line
2. Restart
Try user as '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Rather than 'postmaster'
OK, in Thunderbird Account Settings I changed the username field from
user to [EMAIL PROTECTED]. It worked for one of the accounts:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Still getting the same error message for [EMAIL PROTECTED], I'm
going to recheck all
I want to set up a filter so that all emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] will
not get processed by the other filters (spam checker, virus checker).
I have never written my own filter, but I am guessing I need to do
something like this:
In filters.in.tab:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
On 08.09.2005 17:54, Dan Porter wrote:
I want to set up a filter so that all emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] will
not get processed by the other filters (spam checker, virus checker).
I have never written my own filter, but I am guessing I need to do
something like this:
In filters.in.tab:
Greeting Davide (and everyone else):
Would it be possible to add a STATUS field to XMail's POP3 logs - something
to indicate whether a login was successful or not, and if not successful
perhaps some indicator of why it failed? Something similar to the STATUS
field in the SMTP logs would be great
Are you sure the postmaster account isn't
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Rob: -)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ross Gohlke
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 2:00 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: access logged but client doesn't
Holla Folks,
after having so many boring and annoying topics in this list and on
Haralds forum, I decided to set up an WIKI. So I confered with Davide
about making this one official.
He gave me the OK and now I hope all of you will fill it with stuff and
interesting topics all about XMail.
Holla Folks,
after having so many boring and annoying topics in this list and on
Haralds forum, I decided to set up an WIKI. So I confered with Davide
about making this one official.
He gave me the OK and now I hope all of you will fill it with stuff and
interesting topics all about XMail.
The
I am not sure if this got through the first time so here goes again.
What can I use that will not cost anything to stop spam at the server?
I have tried to work with spamassassin for win32 on win2k and its
installed but how do I hook it to xmail?
I have also used ASSP and it works for a
How does ASSP flake out - I haven't had any problems with ASSP
(running on FreeBSD 5.x, anyway). ASSP is the best solution I have found.
Jeff
Digerati Isabaddass wrote:
I am not sure if this got through the first time so here goes again.
What can I use that will not cost anything to
pft please you think I have not done that already?
I have spamassassin installed already.
Cant figure out how to hook it to xmail in case you failed to read
through my post.
Next time link me to something useful other than a google search.
Link me direct.
On 9/8/05, Sönke Ruempler
On 08.09.2005 22:13, Digerati Isabaddass wrote:
pft please you think I have not done that already?
I have spamassassin installed already.
Cant figure out how to hook it to xmail in case you failed to read
through my post.
Next time link me to something useful other than a google
Yes ASSP was Great to me for the longest time.
Then one day we could not send emails they would time out untill I
stopped ASSP and ran xmail on its own.
I really cant tell whats going on cause all things look good.
When it acts up you cant telnet to port 25 without it taking like 90
secs to
Well thank you. I will work on it some more. I have now a filter and
tab in place, but it says to be sure that spamd si running and I have
no way of knowing how to start it or what not.
On 9/8/05, Sönke Ruempler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 08.09.2005 22:13, Digerati Isabaddass wrote:
On 08.09.2005 22:33, Digerati Isabaddass wrote:
Well thank you. I will work on it some more. I have now a filter and
tab in place, but it says to be sure that spamd si running and I have
no way of knowing how to start it or what not.
I have no experiences with windows servers, so the only
I have run SpamAssasin on Windows servers (both with ActivePerl and CygWin)
and Linux servers. Running SpamAssassin on Linux (or other unix) runs much
faster and more reliably than on Windows.
I run XMail on a Windows server and SpamAssassin on a Fedora Core 4 server.
Works like a charm. I
On 9/8/2005 5:16 PM Jason J. Ellingson wrote:
I have run SpamAssasin on Windows servers (both with ActivePerl and CygWin)
and Linux servers. Running SpamAssassin on Linux (or other unix) runs much
faster and more reliably than on Windows.
I run XMail on a Windows server and SpamAssassin on
I would look more closely at what is causing the problem with ASSP and
continue to use that. I like it much better than Spam Assassin myself,
at least for use with XMail. It is far more efficient since it handles
the SPAM check in the SMTP session then closes it after a specified
number of
What can I use that will not cost anything to stop spam at the server?
I have tried to work with spamassassin for win32 on win2k and its
installed but how do I hook it to xmail?
I have also used ASSP and it works for a while then flakes out and
will not work properly as a proxy for xmail.
-
To
1) Any docs on how to install SpamAssassin on Windows and don't tell you how
to do it via installing CygWin will result in a serial mode SpamAssassin
install. No SpamD, no DCC, no Razor, and no Pyzor.
2) Serial mode SpamAssassin is FAR FAR slower than using SpamD (which is a
form of
ASSP is great and I applaud anyone using it...
ASSP is easier to set up and use than SpamAssassin. I won't argue that.
However, SpamAssassin offers everything ASSP does and more.
In your post:
It (ASSP) is far more efficient since it handles the SPAM check in the
SMTP session then closes it
Try searching here
http://www.mail-archive.com/xmail@xmailserver.org/index.html
This topic has been covered a few times.
Rob :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Digerati Isabaddass
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 2:03 AM
To:
Ah - I was only referring to a Spam Assassin filter I sued with XMail,
and in my case as of about a year ago (the last time I set it up and
used it). Glad that it has all of those features now - it didn't that I
was aware of then. No danger of flame at all - I like dialog about this
stuff -
The perl filter you used for *BSD probably used the serial version of
SpamAssassin. SpamC is a drop-in replacement for the SpamAssassin calls.
SpamD *is* SpamAssassin but running all the time. The slowness you
experienced was because SpamAssassin takes a while to load up before
running. SpamD
Aha! I was following the directions in this doc:
(The original is down)
http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:4R459Pv0lNcJ:www.ubaight.com/xmail/BeginnersGuide.html+xmail+userpasswdhl=en
If you want your root account to get the postmaster's mail your
server.tab setup is complete. I prefer
I have tried to install the patch linked from the XMail homepage:
http://mail.godeltech.com/xmail/
My specs:
FreeBSD 5.3
openssl-0.9.7d
I downloaded the patch and applied it to my preexisting XMail 1.2.1
source. I did not use the binary for FreeBSD 4.8.
gmake -f Makefile-SSL.bsd
outputs this:
27 matches
Mail list logo
