U.Mutlu via xmail wrote on 05/26/2015 04:38 PM:
Bart Mortelmans via xmail wrote on 05/26/2015 03:55 PM:
It might be difficult to determine if the problem is with XMail or with the
client. And even if for example Tencent actually closes the connection
incorrectly, it should be better if XMail wou
Bart Mortelmans via xmail wrote on 05/26/2015 03:55 PM:
It might be difficult to determine if the problem is with XMail or with the
client. And even if for example Tencent actually closes the connection
incorrectly, it should be better if XMail would be able to handle such an
improperly closed co
e then 100-200
emails. So It should be XMAIL SSL problem. Because When I reuse STUNNEL to do a
POP3 tunnel again, the problem will fix.
Original Message
From: Bart Mortelmans
To: t...@os.st, "XMail Users Mailing List"
Sent: Tue, May 26, 2015, 3:13 PM
Subject: Re: [xmail] BUG :
sockets they create.
cu
Uenal
Original Message From: Bart Mortelmans To:
t...@os.st, "XMail Users Mailing List" Sent: Tue,
May 26, 2015, 3:13 PM Subject: Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
Is there any way for you to test if the problem exists if you don't allow
si
STUNNEL to do a
POP3 tunnel again, the problem will fix.
> Original Message
>From: Bart Mortelmans
>To: t...@os.st, "XMail Users Mailing List"
>Sent: Tue, May 26, 2015, 3:13 PM
>Subject: Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
>
>Is there any way for you to te
Oversea Site via xmail wrote on 05/26/2015 07:56 AM:
Anyway I will test this issue in other linux distribution in VM, such as
CentOS. (You can give me any linux distribution, let's build the same
platform in VM. I use virtualbox.
If you could test it with Debian 7 (wheezy) i386, that would make
: "XMail Users Mailing List"
Sent: Tue, May 26, 2015, 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
FEDORA 4 X86_64 GLIBC 2.3.6-3 (I can't upgrade it to the lastest version.
Because I have a chiliasp 3.6.2 32-bit run ASP VBSCRIPT on APACHE 1.3 32-bit
software, it need GLIBC
rCode();
if (pPOPMD->llMsgSize > 0 &&
> Original Message
>From: Oversea Site via xmail
>To: "XMail Users Mailing List"
>Sent: Tue, May 26, 2015, 1:56 PM
>Subject: Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
>
>FEDORA 4 X86_64 GLIBC 2.3.6-3 (I
uot;XMail Users Mailing List"
>Sent: Tue, May 26, 2015, 1:06 PM
>Subject: Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
>
>Oversea Site via xmail wrote on 05/26/2015 05:14 AM:
>> No Log Error. No Fatal Error log. No Core Dump
>>
>> It's not RAM or HW problem. It's
[root@bravo logs]# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_fin_timeout
10
[root@bravo logs]#
> Original Message
>From: "U.Mutlu via xmail"
>To: "U.Mutlu" , "XMail Users Mailing List"
>
>Sent: Tue, May 26, 2015, 1:28 PM
>Subject: Re: [xmail] BUG : X
U.Mutlu via xmail wrote on 05/26/2015 07:06 AM:
Oversea Site via xmail wrote on 05/26/2015 05:14 AM:
No Log Error. No Fatal Error log. No Core Dump
It's not RAM or HW problem. It's XMAIL internal issue, because when I switch
to stunnel, all problems solved. And then when I test K9-MAIL with
XMA
26, 2015, 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
Oversea Site via xmail wrote on 05/25/2015 09:23 PM:
I found the bug on XMAIL 1.27 with SSL (POP3S is main), SSMTP service maybe
has a same bug too
1. it will have too many FIN_WAIT_2 on POP3S with two many requests, It is
becau
ot;
>Sent: Tue, May 26, 2015, 10:11 AM
>Subject: Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
>
>Oversea Site via xmail wrote on 05/25/2015 09:23 PM:
>> I found the bug on XMAIL 1.27 with SSL (POP3S is main), SSMTP service maybe
>> has a same bug too
>>
>> 1. it will ha
Oversea Site via xmail wrote on 05/25/2015 09:23 PM:
I found the bug on XMAIL 1.27 with SSL (POP3S is main), SSMTP service maybe
has a same bug too
1. it will have too many FIN_WAIT_2 on POP3S with two many requests, It is
because of some non-popular WINDOWS CLIENT e.g. tencent foxmail , outlook
I found the bug on XMAIL 1.27 with SSL (POP3S is main), SSMTP service maybe has a same bug too
1. it will have too many FIN_WAIT_2 on POP3S with two many requests, It is because of some non-popular WINDOWS CLIENT e.g. tencent foxmail , outlook will not have this issue.
2. If you're using XMAIL'
15 matches
Mail list logo
