Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 12:22 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: 1.26-pre03
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, Rob Arends wrote:
> Your probably correct.
> Although Xmail won't care - it will handle either.
Bingo. XMail is not as dumb as other softwares, s
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, Rob Arends wrote:
> Your probably correct.
> Although Xmail won't care - it will handle either.
Bingo. XMail is not as dumb as other softwares, so a message with CRLF
inside the mailbox will not confuse it.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubsc
AIL PROTECTED] la part de Rob Arends
>Envoy=E9 : dimanche 7 septembre 2008 14:32
>=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
>Objet : [xmail] Re: 1.26-pre03
>
>
>Wow, that was easier than expected.
>
>Thanks.
>
>PS. Is IMAP4 built in to xMail, still on the agenda?=20
>If so is
PROTECTED] la part de CLEMENT Francis
>Envoy=E9 : lundi 8 septembre 2008 09:38
>=C0 : 'xmail@xmailserver.org'
>Objet : [xmail] Re: 1.26-pre03
>
>
>Just a question :
>
>Does an 'mv' convert CRLF to CR ? I don't remember that :/
>
>Just a suggestion
s
>Envoy=E9 : dimanche 7 septembre 2008 14:32
>=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
>Objet : [xmail] Re: 1.26-pre03
>
>
>Wow, that was easier than expected.
>
>Thanks.
>
>PS. Is IMAP4 built in to xMail, still on the agenda?=20
>If so is there a timeframe?
>
>
>Rob :-)
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of RICK AND SHEILA
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 12:54 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: 1.26-pre03
Rob, I have signed on to X-Mail to see if it will allow me to receive my
vehicle report from On- Star. Is this going to help?
They send in X-Mail Text. Rick
On Sun, 7 Sep 2008, RICK AND SHEILA wrote:
> Rob, I have signed on to X-Mail to see if it will allow me to receive my
> vehicle report from On- Star. Is this going to help?
> They send in X-Mail Text. Rick
Hmm, are you sure it's not in *XML Text*?
In which case XMail has nothing to do with it :)
PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
> Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2008 2:22 PM
> To: xmail@xmailserver.org
> Subject: [xmail] Re: 1.26-pre03
>
> On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Rob Arends wrote:
>
>
>> Davide,
>>
>> If I wanted to use the default unix stora
al Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2008 2:22 PM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: 1.26-pre03
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Rob Arends wrote:
> Davide,
>
> If I wanted to use the default unix sto
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Rob Arends wrote:
> Davide,
>
> If I wanted to use the default unix storage format - is it possible to
> convert the existing windows format mail boxes?
>
> I could write little bit of Perl if the conversion was relatively simple.
Yep:
for_each_domain
doing nothing, but on a cellular level, I'm quite
busy.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2008 8:01 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: 1.26-pre03
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Rob Ar
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Rob Arends wrote:
>
> So this will make my planned IMAP4 implementation easier.
>
> I'm running on w32 and planning to go Linux (mail is my only legacy W32
> platform) and then implement a native Linux IMAP4 server, but I remember
> lots of work arounds for the CRLF/LF issue,
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Rob Arends wrote:
> On Thursday, September 04, 2008 4:22 AM, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Rob Arends wrote:
>
> >> Davide, just out of curiosity.
> >>
> >> Regarding the LF on disk vs CRLF in the SMTP protocol:
> >>
> >> Could you have read the file and co
So this will make my planned IMAP4 implementation easier.
I'm running on w32 and planning to go Linux (mail is my only legacy W32
platform) and then implement a native Linux IMAP4 server, but I remember
lots of work arounds for the CRLF/LF issue, so I was not exited about the
idea of implementing
On Thursday, September 04, 2008 4:22 AM, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Rob Arends wrote:
>> Davide, just out of curiosity.
>>
>> Regarding the LF on disk vs CRLF in the SMTP protocol:
>>
>> Could you have read the file and converted LF->CRLF on the fly while
sending
>> the TCP data
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Edinilson - ATINET wrote:
> I´m asking because seems that XMail 1.26-pre03 is using %TEMP% for these
> temporaly stuff (and not tmp dir).
> Or tmp dir will only be used in others systems NOT Windows?
$MAIL_ROOT/tmp is only used for certain temporary files. The %TEMP% is
still
) 4412-0876
http://www.atinet.com.br
- Original Message -
From: "Davide Libenzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 3:19 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: 1.26-pre03
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Edinilson - ATINET wrote:
> Davide, which kind of files we will see
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Rob Arends wrote:
> Davide, just out of curiosity.
>
> Regarding the LF on disk vs CRLF in the SMTP protocol:
>
> Could you have read the file and converted LF->CRLF on the fly while sending
> the TCP data?
This is what I do now, for Unixes. Windows messages gets sent vanill
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Edinilson - ATINET wrote:
> Davide, which kind of files we will see in the new tmp dir?
>
> We migrated to 1.26-pre03 (Win32) this morning but, after +- 3 hours,
> nothing was saved there.
Hence the name "tmp" :)
Stuff is only temorarly stored there.
- Davide
-
To unsub
Davide, just out of curiosity.
Regarding the LF on disk vs CRLF in the SMTP protocol:
Could you have read the file and converted LF->CRLF on the fly while sending
the TCP data?
Or does that create a performance hit that is unacceptable?
Rob :-)
___
Davide, which kind of files we will see in the new tmp dir?
We migrated to 1.26-pre03 (Win32) this morning but, after +- 3 hours,
nothing was saved there.
Regards
Edinilson
-
ATINET-Professional Web Hosting
Tel Voz: (0xx11) 4412-0876
http:
21 matches
Mail list logo
