[xmail] Re: server.tab CustMapsList

2007-11-08 Thread Edinilson - ATINET
Here we are using: CustMapsList zen.spamhaus.org.:0,dsn.rfc-ignorant.org.:0,bl.spamcop.net.:0 BUT we are having too many '551 Server access forbidden by your IP' *even* with authenticated users (yes, I´m sure they are authenticated). At this moment we could not solve this problem. ps: XMail

[xmail] Re: server.tab CustMapsList

2007-11-08 Thread Francesco Vertova
At 17.03 08/11/07, Edinilson - ATINET wrote: Here we are using: CustMapsList zen.spamhaus.org.:0,dsn.rfc-ignorant.org.:0,bl.spamcop.net.:0 BUT we are having too many '551 Server access forbidden by your IP' *even* with authenticated users (yes, I=B4m sure they are authenticated). The default

[xmail] Re: server.tab CustMapsList

2007-11-08 Thread Edinilson - ATINET
://www.atinet.com.br - Original Message - From: Francesco Vertova [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: xmail@xmailserver.org Sent: Thursday, 8 de November de 2007 14:19 Subject: [xmail] Re: server.tab CustMapsList At 17.03 08/11/07, Edinilson - ATINET wrote: Here we are using: CustMapsList

[xmail] Re: server.tab CustMapsList

2007-11-08 Thread Edinilson - ATINET
Vertova [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: xmail@xmailserver.org Sent: Thursday, 8 de November de 2007 15:04 Subject: [xmail] Re: server.tab CustMapsList At 17.26 08/11/07, you wrote: So, in which situation '551 Server access forbidden by your IP' is returned? I think it's a sort of default error message. Usually

[xmail] Re: server.tab CustMapsList

2007-11-08 Thread Francesco Vertova
At 17.26 08/11/07, you wrote: So, in which situation '551 Server access forbidden by your IP' is returned? I think it's a sort of default error message. Usually from smtp.ipmap.tab, since the other IP-based blocks (CustMapsList and spammers.tab) have their own messages. Because, if I comment

[xmail] Re: server.tab CustMapsList

2007-11-08 Thread Francesco Vertova
At 18.46 08/11/07, you wrote: Here we are using: #SmtpMsgIPBanMaps 550 Denied due inclusion of your IP in the following map With that entry commented out, the peer should get a 550 Denied due inclusion of your IP inside (map name), besides the usual SNDRIP=EIPMAP (map name) in the SMTP log. If

[xmail] Re: server.tab CustMapsList

2007-11-07 Thread Francesco Vertova
At 11.35 07/11/07, you wrote: To filter a bit the spam, I'm using this CustMapsList (but I'm not satisfied at all with my list.) CustMapsList sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org.:0,combined.njabl.org.:0,bl.spamcop.net.:0 Anyone has a better list to give me or complete? It depends on the reasons why you are

[xmail] Re: server.tab CustMapsList

2007-11-07 Thread Emmanuel Gonzalez
Thanks a lot Francesco ! -Message d'origine- De=A0: [EMAIL PROTECTED] = [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Francesco Vertova Envoy=E9=A0: mercredi 7 novembre 2007 12:57 =C0=A0: xmail@xmailserver.org Objet=A0: [xmail] Re: server.tab CustMapsList At 11.35 07/11/07, you wrote

[xmail] Re: server.tab

2005-04-10 Thread Rob Arends
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 9:16 AM To: XMail List Subject: [xmail] Re: server.tab snip If you are using Perl on your server - there is a nice routine - which of course I don't remember site right now

[xmail] Re: server.tab

2005-04-08 Thread CLEMENT Francis
-Message d'origine- De : Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoy=E9 : jeudi 7 avril 2005 19:14 =C0 : 'xmail@xmailserver.org' Objet : [xmail] Re: server.tab =20 =20 =20 Where did you put the settings in the exchange server ? The settings to use a smarthost/gateway (and not doing

[xmail] Re: server.tab

2005-04-08 Thread Brett
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, CLEMENT Francis wrote: In your setup you have a gfi product ... Not anymore. so the above could not work depending of gfi setup and integration with exchange ... Can you give me the exact gfi product name used (and version) as gfi have more than one product for

[xmail] Re: server.tab

2005-04-07 Thread Brett
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Alexander Hagenah wrote: xmail schrieb am Wednesday, April 06, 2005 10:00 PM: Once it's all set up, though, the Exchange server will receive incoming mail from Xmail (with all validation and spam/virus scans done prior to receipt), and all outbound mail from the

[xmail] Re: server.tab

2005-04-07 Thread CLEMENT Francis
(and not doing dns delivery) = are in the 'smtp connector'... Francis -Message d'origine- De : Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoy=E9 : jeudi 7 avril 2005 08:29 =C0 : XMail List Objet : [xmail] Re: server.tab On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Alexander Hagenah wrote: xmail schrieb am Wednesday, April 06

[xmail] Re: server.tab

2005-04-07 Thread Tracy
At 01:12 4/7/2005, Alexander Hagenah wrote: Once it's all set up, though, the Exchange server will receive incoming mail from Xmail (with all validation and spam / virus scans done prior to receipt), and all outbound mail from the Exchange server will go through Xmail as a smarthost. =20

[xmail] Re: server.tab

2005-04-07 Thread Brett
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, CLEMENT Francis wrote: Many of our customers installed with exchange use our xmail servers as smarthost for outgoing mails with no problems from exchange 5.5 to 2003 = (no static ips, or no reverse zone, ...). I have no doubt it does work... 8-) Where did you put the

[xmail] Re: server.tab

2005-04-07 Thread Tracy
At 13:13 4/7/2005, Brett wrote: I have thought about forcing Exchange to use port 24 which should pretty well stop it doing anything but have not researched setting up XMail to run on both ports 25 and 24 - I am not even sure it can. Sure it can. You can run Xmail on any ports you want. I

[xmail] Re: server.tab

2005-04-07 Thread Brett
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Tracy wrote: At 13:13 4/7/2005, Brett wrote: I have thought about forcing Exchange to use port 24 which should pretty well stop it doing anything but have not researched setting up XMail to run on both ports 25 and 24 - I am not even sure it can. Sure it can. You can

[xmail] Re: server.tab

2005-04-06 Thread Mike Harrington
Yes, absolutly. Can be modified while XMail is running: all mailproc.tab files server.tab smtpgw.tab smtpfwd.tab smtprelay.tab smtpauth.tab smtpextauth.tab userdef.tab ctrlaccounts.tab spammers.tab spam-address.tab pop3.ipmap.tab smtp.ipmap.tab ctrl.ipmap.tab finger.ipmap.tab smtp.ipprop.tab

[xmail] Re: server.tab

2005-04-06 Thread Mike Harrington
Why not just use the -Mr switch for the rotation of your logfiles instead? Much better than stopping starting xmail. - Original Message - From: Brett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: xmail@xmailserver.org Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 7:27 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: server.tab On Tue, 5 Apr 2005

[xmail] Re: server.tab

2005-04-06 Thread Francesco Vertova
At 00.55 06/04/05 -0700, you wrote: Can _NOT_ be modified while XMail is running (And shouldn't be edited by hand - use the CTRL Admin Protocol instead): aliases.tab aliasdomain.tab domains.tab extaliases.tab mailusers.tab pop3links.tab They shouldn't be modified through the CTRL cfgfileset

[xmail] Re: server.tab

2005-04-06 Thread Sönke Ruempler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, April 06, 2005 10:12 AM: At 00.55 06/04/05 -0700, you wrote: =20 Can _NOT_ be modified while XMail is running (And shouldn't be edited by hand - use the CTRL Admin Protocol instead): =20 aliases.tab aliasdomain.tab domains.tab extaliases.tab

[xmail] Re: server.tab

2005-04-06 Thread Brett
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Mike Harrington wrote: Why not just use the -Mr switch for the rotation of your logfiles instead? Much better than stopping starting xmail. Well - cause I want to? 8-) I am currently doing a ton of logging from my filters. Setup is basically this - I could be ALL WRONG

[xmail] Re: server.tab

2005-04-06 Thread Tracy
At 06:03 4/6/2005, Brett wrote: Mail for MYCOMPANY.COM is handled by XMail at MYDOMAIN.COM All mail (that gets thru the filters) for MYCOMPANY.COM is handed to an (GACK!) Exchange 2000 server. I do this thru a Custom Domain. First anything getting through the Spam Lists, DNS, etc. and received

[xmail] Re: server.tab

2005-04-06 Thread Tracy
At 13:58 4/6/2005, Brett wrote: Since this all feeds into an Exchange 2000 server (which is 'stunningly stupid' and was made even 'more stupid' when we tried to use GFI on it never mind the huge COST of the GFI software that - as it looks now - is in a bad ROI ratio compared to XMail 8-) about all

[xmail] Re: server.tab

2005-04-06 Thread Brett
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Tracy wrote: At 13:58 4/6/2005, Brett wrote: Since this all feeds into an Exchange 2000 server (which is 'stunningly stupid' and was made even 'more stupid' when we tried to use GFI on it never mind the huge COST of the GFI software that - as it looks now - is in a

[xmail] Re: server.tab

2005-04-06 Thread Tracy
At 15:59 4/6/2005, Brett wrote: Once it's all set up, though, the Exchange server will receive incoming mail from Xmail (with all validation and spam / virus scans done prior to receipt), and all outbound mail from the Exchange server will go through Xmail as a smarthost. I can't seem to

[xmail] Re: server.tab

2005-04-06 Thread Mike Harrington
An incomplete MSFT KB article? NO WAY! - Original Message - From: Tracy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: xmail@xmailserver.org Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 1:10 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: server.tab At 15:59 4/6/2005, Brett wrote: Once it's all set up, though, the Exchange server

[xmail] Re: server.tab

2005-04-06 Thread Alexander Hagenah
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am Wednesday, April 06, 2005 10:00 PM: Once it's all set up, though, the Exchange server will receive incoming mail from Xmail (with all validation and spam / virus scans done prior to receipt), and all outbound mail from the Exchange server will go through Xmail as

[xmail] Re: server.tab

2005-04-05 Thread Brett
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Ladislav Sedivy wrote: Can you change server.tab without restarting xmail on Windows 2000? I don't think you can without some admin software. I installed as a service so I have used the Services to restart but I also use a batch file (to clean and rotate logfiles) I just

[xmail] Re: server.tab

2002-06-05 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Davide schrieb: until it's the fastest mta i do not plan changes :-) Huh? I thought XMail is already the fastest? Which one is faster? Gerrit -- =^..^= - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send

[xmail] Re: server.tab

2002-06-04 Thread Henrik Steffen
why not use control client? Mit freundlichem Gruß Henrik Steffen Geschäftsführer top concepts Internetmarketing GmbH Am Steinkamp 7 - D-21684 Stade - Germany http://www.topconcepts.com Tel. +49 4141 991230 mail: [EMAIL

[xmail] Re: server.tab

2002-06-04 Thread Sönke Ruempler
Now these ideas would not really make much of an impact on a nicely spec'd server, but for a little linux server at home, it could have some performance improvements hmm on a home linux machine with 10 accounts and some mails per day the performance improvements should be near 0 :-) -