1:11 +0000
> Subject: Re: [xmail] strange Xmail behaviour (v1.23)
>
> On 5 Jan 2010 at 18:24, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > > Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 14:16:23 -0800
> > > From: davi...@xmailserver.org
> > > To: xmail@xmailserver.org
> > >
On 5 Jan 2010 at 18:24, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
>
>
> > Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 14:16:23 -0800
> > From: davi...@xmailserver.org
> > To: xmail@xmailserver.org
> > Subject: Re: [xmail] strange Xmail behaviour (v1.23)
> >
> > On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, Spyros
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, David Lord wrote:
> On 4 Jan 2010 at 9:27, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, David Lord wrote:
> >
> > > I think Davide prefers the xmail options all to be in commandline
> > > whilst I'd prefer an xmail.conf but it's not that important an
> > > issue for me. My
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
>
> > Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 14:16:23 -0800
> > From: davi...@xmailserver.org
> > To: xmail@xmailserver.org
> > Subject: Re: [xmail] strange Xmail behaviour (v1.23)
> >
> > On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, Spyros T
> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 14:16:23 -0800
> From: davi...@xmailserver.org
> To: xmail@xmailserver.org
> Subject: Re: [xmail] strange Xmail behaviour (v1.23)
>
> On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
>
> [ BLAH BLAH BLAH . . . ]
>
> > I _did_ check the syste
On 4 Jan 2010 at 9:27, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, David Lord wrote:
>
> > I think Davide prefers the xmail options all to be in commandline
> > whilst I'd prefer an xmail.conf but it's not that important an
> > issue for me. My commandline options are set in /etc/rc.d/xmail
> > b
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
>
> Hi again Davide,
>
> >
> > 1.23?!?
> > I wasn't even born when 1.23 came out! :)
>
> :-) Yes, yes, we should upgrade to the latest version when available.
> I know.
>
>
> > > People for this specific box started complaining that they send mail
> >
Hi again Davide,
>
> 1.23?!?
> I wasn't even born when 1.23 came out! :)
:-) Yes, yes, we should upgrade to the latest version when available.
I know.
> > People for this specific box started complaining that they send mail
> > from their MUAs but never receive anything or their intended
>
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, David Lord wrote:
> I think Davide prefers the xmail options all to be in commandline
> whilst I'd prefer an xmail.conf but it's not that important an
> issue for me. My commandline options are set in /etc/rc.d/xmail
> but on linux I've no idea.
Let me be clear again on that.
On 4 Jan 2010 at 15:05, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
>
> Hello people,
>
> I've had a strange XMail behaviour the last couple of days.
> Server was (I've upgraded it, please read on) a slackware 12.2
> box with XMail v1.23.
>
> People for this specific box started complaining that they send
mail
> fr
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
> Hello people,
>
> I've had a strange XMail behaviour the last couple of days.
> Server was (I've upgraded it, please read on) a slackware 12.2
> box with XMail v1.23.
1.23?!?
I wasn't even born when 1.23 came out! :)
> People for this specific box s
Hello people,
I've had a strange XMail behaviour the last couple of days.
Server was (I've upgraded it, please read on) a slackware 12.2
box with XMail v1.23.
People for this specific box started complaining that they send mail
from their MUAs but never receive anything or their intended
receipi
12 matches
Mail list logo
