This change:
commit b1dac41fb3853ca8182048ea57b88b6e84ecceb3
Author: Paulo Cesar Pereira de Andrade [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun Dec 7 02:22:19 2008 -0200
Use libtool convenience libraries and better symbol table.
seems to break the build on sparc:
sdksyms.c:1740: error:
From: Paulo César Pereira de Andrade [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 22:17:27 -0200 (BRST)
Thanks. I know about that special definition, but my mind did
some trick on me when I wrote the awk code :-) Should be correct
now.
Yep, seems to work now, thanks.
From: Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 09:49:29 +0100 (CET)
Ironically fontconfig was adopted in large part because the core fonts
system had major problems with internationalization.
Ironically you didn't read my posting.
I'm not against any of this stuff, I'm against
From: Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 10:58:17 +0100 (CET)
If there is somethign obvious here, is that emacs maintainers didn't
made due diligence by any reasonable definition. Even the kernel made
major changes (devfs, sysfs, etc) in the time it took for emacs folks
From: Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 21:05:46 +1100
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 01:39:32AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 09:49:29 +0100 (CET)
Ironically fontconfig was adopted in large part because the core
From: Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 11:26:51 +0100 (CET)
Le Lun 1 décembre 2008 11:19, David Miller a écrit :
From: Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 10:58:17 +0100 (CET)
If there is somethign obvious here, is that emacs maintainers
I just want to voice my dislike of the HAL input layer stuff, but just
that it's the default. Right now that doesn't make any sense.
I try to keep uptodate with current GIT to make sure sparc doesn't
break.
But what I spend most of my time doing is figuring out what new
default breaks Xorg on
From: Jeremy Huddleston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:52:53 -0800
I have a sun type6 usb keyboard, and evdev treats it as pc105+inet:
That's correct as far as I can tell.
Actually, I'm assuming you're under Linux, and if you are all keyboard
types emit PC keyboard codes rather
From: Jeremy Huddleston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 19:49:52 -0800
On Nov 16, 2008, at 18:54, David Miller wrote:
I have a sun type6 usb keyboard, and evdev treats it as pc105+inet:
That's correct as far as I can tell.
Actually, I'm assuming you're under Linux
