Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:24:19 -0700
From: Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
On 09/19/11 15:12, Aaron Plattner wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 02:51:07PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
libshadow depends on libfb for fbGetWinPrivateKey
libvbe depends on libint10 for
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:17:33AM -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
So, one of the things talked about at XDC was just how icky bugzilla has
become. There are a ton of open bugs which haven't been touched in ages and
either don't apply any more or don't have sufficient information to act
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:46:57PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
- elographics is maintained, but Marc hasn't committed to the driver yet.
I know that elographics-1.3.0 crashed on UnInit with server 1.10 until I
fixed it about a month after the release.
I'm currently in a private
Hello guys!
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:46:57PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
- elographics is maintained, but Marc hasn't committed to the driver yet.
I know that elographics-1.3.0 crashed on UnInit with server 1.10 until I
fixed it about a month after the release.
I'm currently in a
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 10:49:33PM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
(after my short talk here at XDC chicago, let's get this out to
everyone)
It's time again to start planning for the next FOSDEM. After our poor
showing in 2010 (where in the end openmoko got given half our time, as
we had not
On 20/09/11 18:37 , Marc Balmer wrote:
Hello guys!
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:46:57PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
- elographics is maintained, but Marc hasn't committed to the driver yet.
I know that elographics-1.3.0 crashed on UnInit with server 1.10 until I
fixed it about a month
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:18:15PM +0300, Alon Levy wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 10:49:33PM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
...
deliver. So, with a deadline of oktober 1st, i am now asking for 6
people (basically fill up saturday afternoon) to step up and promise to
hold a talk at
Hi,
On Tuesday, 20 September 2011, Luc Verhaegen l...@skynet.be wrote:
This sound like a rather redhat specific topic. How certain are you that
redhat is going to send you to FOSDEM, and if they don't, are you coming
regardless?
In much the same way that every RadeonHD talk was completely
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:41:48AM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday, 20 September 2011, Luc Verhaegen l...@skynet.be wrote:
This sound like a rather redhat specific topic. How certain are you that
redhat is going to send you to FOSDEM, and if they don't, are you coming
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 16:10 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
Shouldn't XI_CFLAGS and MALLOC_ZERO_CFLAGS be in CPPFLAGS as well?
Assuming they're really pre-processor flags rather than compilation
flags, yes... I admit I didn't dive into those since they were not
part of the problem being
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:49:33 +0200, Luc Verhaegen l...@skynet.be wrote:
So... After our terrible showing in 2010, i now need more to convince
the FOSDEM organizers that we are worth of a DevRoom, that we can
deliver. So, with a deadline of oktober 1st, i am now asking for 6
people
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:12:17PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:49:33 +0200, Luc Verhaegen l...@skynet.be wrote:
So... After our terrible showing in 2010, i now need more to convince
the FOSDEM organizers that we are worth of a DevRoom, that we can
deliver. So, with a
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 17:17 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Mostly straightforward addition of new xcb/util-* submodules, but
util-common-m4 needs special handling since it doesn't have the
usual autoconfery, just needs to be found in the aclocal path when
autoconfing the other xcb/util*
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 02:33:08PM +0300, Alon Levy wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:32:21PM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:18:15PM +0300, Alon Levy wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 10:49:33PM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
...
deliver. So, with a deadline of
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:32:21PM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:18:15PM +0300, Alon Levy wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 10:49:33PM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
...
deliver. So, with a deadline of oktober 1st, i am now asking for 6
people (basically fill up
Hi,
On 09/20/2011 12:57 PM, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:41:48AM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday, 20 September 2011, Luc Verhaegenl...@skynet.be wrote:
This sound like a rather redhat specific topic. How certain are you that
redhat is going to send you to
On 17/09/2011 02:11, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 09/16/11 06:04, Jon TURNEY wrote:
On 16/09/2011 05:21, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 09/12/11 07:18, Jon TURNEY wrote:
+# XORG_FONT_MKFONTDIR()
+# ---
+# Minimum version: 1.1.1
Shouldn't that be 1.3.0 since we already released
On 17/09/2011 02:11, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 09/16/11 06:04, Jon TURNEY wrote:
On 16/09/2011 05:21, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 09/12/11 07:18, Jon TURNEY wrote:
+# XORG_FONT_MKFONTDIR()
+# ---
+# Minimum version: 1.1.1
Shouldn't that be 1.3.0 since we already released
On 09/20/11 00:54, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
I recently looked at the X.Org patchwork
(http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/project/Xorg/list/). It also
appears to have a lot of stale data. Any plans to clean it up too ?
To do that I think we need to grant more people the power to mark other's
patches
The following changes since commit 0caeef6146bee5fb1827ab25db191685dde9d4b4:
Version bumped to 1.11 (2011-08-26 16:46:13 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://people.freedesktop.org/~alanc/xserver.git master
Alan Coopersmith (8):
xfree86: move -novtswitch -sharevts
On 09/20/11 00:44, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Alan, isn't the the problem of the linker dependencies solved by
adding -module like you did in the diff for the driver modules you
sent out a couple of days ago?
That can make it so the build doesn't complain about missing symbols
if you want. Our
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Jamey Sharp ja...@minilop.net wrote:
I've built each patch in the series and minimally tested that each
resulting server works with the xf86-video-nested driver, a window
manager, and an xterm. That means I'm not testing most of the changed
code paths, but I'm
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 07:30:11AM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 09/20/11 00:54, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
I recently looked at the X.Org patchwork
(http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/project/Xorg/list/). It also
appears to have a lot of stale data. Any plans to clean it up too ?
To do that I
On Sep 19, 2011, at 9:11 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
Sounds good to me. I did some clean ups a few months ago, but barely
made a dent.
What do you suggest we do about bugs where the reporter provides a
bogus patch which fixes the problem for him, is unable to reproduce
his own report, and
I just realized I made (at least one) error in the inline functions I wrote
below. s/ 0/ 1/ ... there're probably others, but that just emphasizes my
point that there should be conversion routines rather than repeating this code
with possible error in other locations.
On Sep 19, 2011, at 7:03
I created server-1.11-branch a few days ago, and the plan is to get 1.11.1 RC1
out this Friday. Seeing as how there isn't any change yet on master, we have
nothing to cherry-pick in at this point. As such, I don't expect that there
will be much churn going into 1.11.1 and would like to keep
On 09/20/11 04:24, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 17:17 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Mostly straightforward addition of new xcb/util-* submodules, but
util-common-m4 needs special handling since it doesn't have the
usual autoconfery, just needs to be found in the aclocal path when
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 14:53 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 09/20/11 04:24, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 17:17 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Mostly straightforward addition of new xcb/util-* submodules, but
util-common-m4 needs special handling since it doesn't have the
From: Olivier Fourdan four...@xfce.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40577
FreeSelectionProperty() did not check for the count of items in array
and relied on a NULL terminated list, which can cause libXt to crash if
FreeSelectionProperty() follows a call to GetSelectionProperty()
On 09/05/11 08:37, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
I've long gotten semi-regular locking failures from xauth where there
really shouldn't be. Tracked down to error checking in libXau being
too restrictive on the failure mechanisms it expects.
-- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fulle...@over-yonder.net
Hi,
On Tuesday, 20 September 2011, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
wrote:
Daniel, think you might pop over for the weekend and teach us a thing or
two about the DRM infrastructure and what it might look like in a year
or two as more SoC gradually become mainline?
Perhaps. FOSDEM is a
Comparing the end result of this patchset before and after the cleanup reveals
this change. Was this intentional or did something slip through when
restructuring?
$ git diff c70241de29ae9c80a89be29e16b838b14a83445e
5057dc2020e8854a97570442bc897a87b4fb8ac2
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/vgahw/vgaHW.c
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jeremy Huddleston jerem...@apple.com wrote:
Comparing the end result of this patchset before and after the cleanup
reveals this change. Was this intentional or did something slip through when
restructuring?
$ git diff
sorry, travelling, late answer.
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 06:46:09PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 11:36:51 +1000, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
wrote:
void
NewCurrentScreen(DeviceIntPtr pDev, ScreenPtr newScreen, int x, int y)
{
-SpritePtr pSprite =
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:30:17 +1000, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
wrote:
yes, but if the device is floating and a kbd device only, we can't generate
motion events for it anyway - we don't have a pointer to generate them
on.
Would it be a good idea to not simply assume the caller
Nice.
Reviewed-by: Matt Dew mar...@osource.org
On 09/19/2011 03:29 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 09/17/11 16:37, Matt Dew wrote:
Hi Alan,
In the IDs attributes for funcdef, sect and chapter, I was keeping the id
attributes matching the title. (I've got a series of patches coming
any day
On 09/20/11 16:32, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
The git submodules have a public relation problem. Nothing tells you there is
one and you get a strange build failure. You don't think of running the 'git
submodule' commands.
Yeah, I should switch to using build.sh to do my pulls, but I've had my own
37 matches
Mail list logo
