> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:24:19 -0700 > From: Alan Coopersmith <[email protected]> > > On 09/19/11 15:12, Aaron Plattner wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 02:51:07PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > >> libshadow depends on libfb for fbGetWinPrivateKey > >> libvbe depends on libint10 for xf86Int10AllocPages, xf86Int10FreePages, > >> xf86ExecX86int10, xf86ExtendedInitInt10, xf86FreeInt10, xf86int10Addr > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith<[email protected]> > >> --- > >> hw/xfree86/dixmods/Makefile.am | 1 + > >> hw/xfree86/vbe/Makefile.am | 1 + > >> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/hw/xfree86/dixmods/Makefile.am > >> b/hw/xfree86/dixmods/Makefile.am > >> index 1a162ab..10001a5 100644 > >> --- a/hw/xfree86/dixmods/Makefile.am > >> +++ b/hw/xfree86/dixmods/Makefile.am > >> @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ librecord_la_SOURCES = recordmod.c > >> > >> libshadow_la_LDFLAGS = -avoid-version > >> libshadow_la_LIBADD = $(top_builddir)/miext/shadow/libshadow.la > >> +libshadow_la_LIBADD += libfb.la > > > > Just linking these together doesn't seem right, since it won't initialize > > it as a module. Should it call xf86LoadSubModule at runtime instead? > > Honestly, I don't know - this patch was added to our server as part > of work to satisfy linker dependencies, and I'm not that familiar > with xf86LoadSubModule.
Alan, isn't the the problem of the linker dependencies solved by adding -module like you did in the diff for the driver modules you sent out a couple of days ago? _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
