Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net writes:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:13:28PM -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
I'm not a fan at all. This API is really bad compared to what's provided by
libbacktrace, which is super simple. This also seem to require callbacks
that have Linux in the name.
Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net writes:
Keith, pls note that I added the diff you sent me in reply as a patch
authored and signed-off-by you.
Thanks.
Keith Packard (1):
kdrive: handle WxH as valid geometry spec
Peter Hutterer (4):
ephyr: xcb_connect returns an error,
DamageUnregister takes only one argument now.
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com
---
Here's a fix for the X server API change
src/driver.c | 4 ++--
src/drmmode_display.c | 3 +--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/driver.c b/src/driver.c
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Siarhei Siamashka
siarhei.siamas...@gmail.com wrote:
I was considering to get xrandr working at least on sunxi hardware.
So that dual monitor support and screen resolution switching at
runtime works in X11 desktop in a standard way transparently for the
On 13-11-14 03:09 AM, Keith Packard wrote:
- DamageUnregister(pScreen-GetScreenPixmap(pScreen)-drawable,
ms-damage);
+ DamageUnregister(ms-damage);
Wouldn't that break on earlier server versions?
The Intel driver added this code in compat-api.h:
#if XORG_VERSION_CURRENT =
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 06:57:37AM -0600, Daniel Drake wrote:
Yes, it works reasonably well. Not perfect, I did catch a hang, and
800x600 doesn't work quite right, but I think that is fixable. I'd
definitely invest more time into it if/when it seems like there is an
available X DDX with Mali
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Luc Verhaegen l...@skynet.be wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 06:57:37AM -0600, Daniel Drake wrote:
Yes, it works reasonably well. Not perfect, I did catch a hang, and
800x600 doesn't work quite right, but I think that is fixable. I'd
definitely invest more time
Gaetan Nadon mems...@videotron.ca writes:
On 13-11-14 03:09 AM, Keith Packard wrote:
-DamageUnregister(pScreen-GetScreenPixmap(pScreen)-drawable,
ms-damage);
+DamageUnregister(ms-damage);
Wouldn't that break on earlier server versions?
Yes.
The Intel driver added this code in
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 07:26:13AM -0600, Daniel Drake wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Luc Verhaegen l...@skynet.be wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 06:57:37AM -0600, Daniel Drake wrote:
Yes, it works reasonably well. Not perfect, I did catch a hang, and
800x600 doesn't work quite
As libxshmfence is Linux-only (or is it Linux + Solaris now), including it in
xorg.modules for everyone causes build failure for everyone else...
http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2013-11-14-0003/
--Jeremy
On Nov 13, 2013, at 9:59, Rob Clark robcl...@kemper.freedesktop.org wrote:
xorg.modules |
On Thu, 2013-11-14 at 16:28 +0900, Keith Packard wrote:
Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com writes:
Adam Jackson (6):
damage: Remove isWindow from the DamageRec
xfree86: Bump to video ABI 15 and input ABI 20
glx: Remove current context cache
glx: Fix memory leak in
On 13-11-14 01:34 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote:
As libxshmfence is Linux-only (or is it Linux + Solaris now), including it in
xorg.modules for everyone causes build failure for everyone else...
This raises an interesting question. Should the modules list be the
lowest common denominator?
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 05:00:29PM +0900, Keith Packard wrote:
Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net writes:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:13:28PM -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
I'm not a fan at all. This API is really bad compared to what's provided by
libbacktrace, which is super
Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net writes:
From the discussion I gathered that libunwind is the best option for now
until someone implements and external backtracer through fork() +
exec().
Sounds good.
So please ignore this patchset.
I was wondering whether we should add some
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net
---
configure.ac | 15 ---
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index eb90b1a..f08c914 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -306,10 +306,18 @@
As we expand our use of shared memory via the new extensions, we should try
to make sure we're not making more problems along the lines of those mentioned
in the presentation linked below associated whitepaper published at:
Those defines are so you can compile-time check do I have a
dri_interface.h that defines this new field of the struct? You don't
want the server to claim it implements the new struct just because you
installed a new copy of Mesa.
---
glx/glxdri2.c | 4 ++--
glx/glxdricommon.c | 2 +-
If we extend __DRI_CORE or __DRI_SWRAST in dri_interface.h to allow a
new version, it shouldn't make old server code retroactively require
the new version from swrast drivers.
Notably, new Mesa defines __DRI_SWRAST version 4, but we still want to
be able to probe version 1 drivers, since we don't
This avoids compiler warnings when initializing with string constants.
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com
---
hw/xfree86/common/xf86str.h | 14 +++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/common/xf86str.h b/hw/xfree86/common/xf86str.h
index
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 06:18:06PM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
As we expand our use of shared memory via the new extensions, we should try
to make sure we're not making more problems along the lines of those mentioned
in the presentation linked below associated whitepaper published at:
My understanding is that the new code, by passing shared memory
through fd is a lot better since [...]
In those respects, yes. But it's worse in that it requires write
access to a filesystem - a filesystem which supports mmap - with space
enough to hold the shared memory segments, which
Le vendredi 15 novembre 2013 à 11:25 +1000, Peter Hutterer a écrit :
-AM_CONDITIONAL(HAVE_LIBUNWIND, [test x$HAVE_LIBUNWIND = xyes])
[...]
+AM_CONDITIONAL(LIBUNWIND, [test x$LIBUNWIND = xyes])
That's not going to work unless the conditional variable in
os/Makefile.am is updated as well. Other
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 02:16:19AM -0500, Mouse wrote:
My understanding is that the new code, by passing shared memory
through fd is a lot better since [...]
In those respects, yes. But it's worse in that it requires write
access to a filesystem - a filesystem which supports mmap - with
23 matches
Mail list logo
