Re: [PATCH] exa/mixed: Partially restore deferred pixmap handling for frontbuffer.

2011-02-21 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Fre, 2011-02-18 at 14:23 +0100, Maarten Maathuis wrote: 2011/2/11 Maarten Maathuis madman2...@gmail.com: 2011/2/11 Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net: On Don, 2011-02-10 at 20:44 +0100, Maarten Maathuis wrote: 2011/2/10 Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net: On Don, 2011-02-10 at 20:15

Re: [PATCH] exa/mixed: Partially restore deferred pixmap handling for frontbuffer.

2011-02-21 Thread Ferry Huberts
On 02/21/2011 01:11 PM, Michel D�nzer wrote: On Fre, 2011-02-18 at 14:23 +0100, Maarten Maathuis wrote: 2011/2/11 Maarten Maathuis madman2...@gmail.com: 2011/2/11 Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net: On Don, 2011-02-10 at 20:44 +0100, Maarten Maathuis wrote: 2011/2/10 Michel Dänzer

Re: [PATCH] exa/mixed: Partially restore deferred pixmap handling for frontbuffer.

2011-02-18 Thread Maarten Maathuis
2011/2/11 Maarten Maathuis madman2...@gmail.com: 2011/2/11 Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net: On Don, 2011-02-10 at 20:44 +0100, Maarten Maathuis wrote: 2011/2/10 Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net: On Don, 2011-02-10 at 20:15 +0100, Maarten Maathuis wrote: - It turns out that part of the

Re: [PATCH] exa/mixed: Partially restore deferred pixmap handling for frontbuffer.

2011-02-10 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mit, 2011-02-09 at 21:09 +0100, Maarten Maathuis wrote: - It turns out that part of the problem was actually on the driver side. I did express my suspicion about that during the review... - The performance loss is not worth the small visual improvement. - This should ensure low latency at

[PATCH] exa/mixed: Partially restore deferred pixmap handling for frontbuffer.

2011-02-10 Thread Maarten Maathuis
- It turns out that part of the problem was actually on the driver side. - The performance loss is not worth the small visual improvement. - This should ensure low latency at low throughput. - Performance loss seems less than 10% instead of the previous 33%. - It's not needed to set

Re: [PATCH] exa/mixed: Partially restore deferred pixmap handling for frontbuffer.

2011-02-10 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Don, 2011-02-10 at 18:21 +0100, Maarten Maathuis wrote: - It's not needed to set deferred_mixed_pixmap to NULL, because exaDoMigration_mixed will handle that. True, so... @@ -721,9 +721,13 @@ ExaBlockHandler(int screenNum, pointer blockData, pointer pTimeout,

[PATCH] exa/mixed: Partially restore deferred pixmap handling for frontbuffer.

2011-02-10 Thread Maarten Maathuis
- It turns out that part of the problem was actually on the driver side. - The performance loss is not worth the small visual improvement. - This should ensure low latency at low throughput. - Performance loss seems about 5% instead of the previous 33%. - It's not needed to set

Re: [PATCH] exa/mixed: Partially restore deferred pixmap handling for frontbuffer.

2011-02-10 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Don, 2011-02-10 at 20:15 +0100, Maarten Maathuis wrote: - It turns out that part of the problem was actually on the driver side. - The performance loss is not worth the small visual improvement. - This should ensure low latency at low throughput. - Performance loss seems about 5% instead

Re: [PATCH] exa/mixed: Partially restore deferred pixmap handling for frontbuffer.

2011-02-10 Thread Maarten Maathuis
2011/2/10 Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net: On Don, 2011-02-10 at 20:15 +0100, Maarten Maathuis wrote: - It turns out that part of the problem was actually on the driver side. - The performance loss is not worth the small visual improvement. - This should ensure low latency at low throughput.

Re: [PATCH] exa/mixed: Partially restore deferred pixmap handling for frontbuffer.

2011-02-10 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Don, 2011-02-10 at 20:44 +0100, Maarten Maathuis wrote: 2011/2/10 Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net: On Don, 2011-02-10 at 20:15 +0100, Maarten Maathuis wrote: - It turns out that part of the problem was actually on the driver side. - The performance loss is not worth the small visual

[PATCH] exa/mixed: Partially restore deferred pixmap handling for frontbuffer.

2011-02-09 Thread Maarten Maathuis
- It turns out that part of the problem was actually on the driver side. - The performance loss is not worth the small visual improvement. - This should ensure low latency at low throughput. - Performance loss seems less than 10% instead of the previous 33%. Signed-off-by: Maarten Maathuis

Re: [PATCH] exa/mixed: Partially restore deferred pixmap handling for frontbuffer.

2011-02-09 Thread Maarten Maathuis
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Maarten Maathuis madman2...@gmail.com wrote: - It turns out that part of the problem was actually on the driver side. - The performance loss is not worth the small visual improvement. - This should ensure low latency at low throughput. - Performance loss seems