Hi,
On 07/14/2014 03:41 PM, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi,
On 14 July 2014 13:51, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/14/2014 02:43 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 14:33:00 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Can I / we please get a reply from you on this ?
As explained
Hi,
On 07/15/2014 10:42 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
snip
It might not be strictly harmful in some cases, but it's not the sort of
thing I want to encourage. 'Always include xorg-server.h before any X
header ever' is a really simple rule to remember for driver developers;
muddying the water,
On 15.07.2014 17:43, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 07/15/2014 10:42 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
It might not be strictly harmful in some cases, but it's not the sort of
thing I want to encourage. 'Always include xorg-server.h before any X
header ever' is a really simple rule to remember for driver
14.07.2014 19:41, Daniel Stone wrote:
os.h isn't safe to necessarily safe to include without xorg-server.h, as
it drags in misc.h, which has: extern _X_EXPORT void SwapLongs(CARD32
*list, unsigned long count);
Again, CARD32 is unsigned long without xorg-server.h, which makes it
64-bit on those
Hi Daniel,
Can I / we please get a reply from you on this ?
As explained below this is not about glamor.h, but about
making os.h safe to include which really is an
orthogonal problem, The glamor.h usage of os.h was
just a (bad) example.
Regards,
Hans
On 07/03/2014 10:50 PM, Hans de Goede
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 14:33:00 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Can I / we please get a reply from you on this ?
As explained below this is not about glamor.h, but about
making os.h safe to include which really is an
orthogonal problem, The glamor.h usage of os.h was
just a (bad)
Hi,
On 07/14/2014 02:43 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 14:33:00 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Can I / we please get a reply from you on this ?
As explained below this is not about glamor.h, but about
making os.h safe to include which really is an
orthogonal
Hi,
On 14 July 2014 13:51, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/14/2014 02:43 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 14:33:00 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Can I / we please get a reply from you on this ?
As explained below this is not about glamor.h, but about
making
Hi Daniel,
On 07/03/2014 12:07 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi,
On 2 July 2014 20:14, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
include/os.h defines protyptes for various non ansi-c str functions, such
as str[n]casecmp and strndup. The definition of the prototypes is guarded
by #ifndef
include/os.h defines protyptes for various non ansi-c str functions, such
as str[n]casecmp and strndup. The definition of the prototypes is guarded
by #ifndef HAVE_STRFOO, but HAVE_STRFOO is defined by xorg-server.h which
is not included by all users of os.h. E.g. glamor.h does not and should not
Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com writes:
include/os.h defines protyptes for various non ansi-c str functions, such
as str[n]casecmp and strndup. The definition of the prototypes is guarded
by #ifndef HAVE_STRFOO, but HAVE_STRFOO is defined by xorg-server.h which
is not included by all users
Hi,
On 2 July 2014 20:14, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
include/os.h defines protyptes for various non ansi-c str functions, such
as str[n]casecmp and strndup. The definition of the prototypes is guarded
by #ifndef HAVE_STRFOO, but HAVE_STRFOO is defined by xorg-server.h which
is
12 matches
Mail list logo
