SPAM: Start SpamAssassin results --
SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered
SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future.
SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
SPAM:
SPAM: Content
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 01:59:03PM +0800, Hua zhang wrote:
Yes. There is a project that needs to study the arithmetic of Window's GDI, but
there is no way to get its source code you know. We hope to study the GDI functions
of Linux first, that is XFree86. It is a huge code package and I have no
HB Does anyone know what the problem might be ?
It is likely that your homebrew X server and your distribution-
provided gdm disagree on the location of authorisation files; try
disabling authorisation in gdm. (No, I cannot help you, I use xdm
myself.)
If that's not it, we need to see gdm's
You can run Gnome/KDE with kdrive just fine.
The biggest headache is getting kdrive all its command line arguments,
in particular, the font path; this makes for a long command line for
the X server. Kdrive does not use a configuration file (which may not
exist in embedded applications).
The one
On Tuesday 26 November 2002 2:48 pm, Owen Savill wrote:
It works :-)
However, only if I login as a user, launch X, lauch a console and do an
'su' !!!
Attempts to do any 3D stuff without doing this (even root) is met with :
libGL error: failed to open DRM: Operation not permitted
libGL
Thanx, I will give it try ...
Do you Think that a 4.2.0 KDRIVE will work with XFree 4.02 Libraries ?
HBDo you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now
True ! M$ has detected that you are trying to use DRM stuff. Just
because you couldn't get us with the law for doing illegal stuff don't
think we can't get you for doing perfectly legal stuff. Sounds about
right I feel !
But seriously, all I had to do was add a DRI section and a mode of
0666
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 09:56:56PM +, Bruce M Beach wrote:
SPAM: Start SpamAssassin results --
SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered
SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future.
SPAM: See
Greetings all. I hope to attain some help from some of
you gurus. I have been pounding away at this problem
for 9 months now, and would REALLY like to figure it
out before 4.3 hits the servers.
Before I explain, I'll lay down that this problem has
reproduced itself on 3 different machines (all
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 01:45:30PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Hmm, so we have 3 pieces of evidence that it isn't spam, four that it
is (all of which are from blacklists), the blacklist scores were enough
to get the message scored as spam, and yet it wasn't spam.
Are we sure we want to be
Around 14 o'clock on Nov 26, David Dawes wrote:
All I can really say so far without having analysed the data is that
the number of false positives has been relatively small compared to the
number of valid positives. I need to assess now many valid positives
were attributable to the RBL
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 11:26:35AM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
Around 14 o'clock on Nov 26, David Dawes wrote:
All I can really say so far without having analysed the data is that
the number of false positives has been relatively small compared to the
number of valid positives. I need to
HB Do you Think that a 4.2.0 KDRIVE will work with XFree 4.02 Libraries ?
No problem.
Juliusz
___
Xpert mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
En/na David Dawes ha escrit:
All I can really say so far without having analysed the data is that
the number of false positives has been relatively small compared to
Zero false positives is the only acceptable result, if you're using it
to discard email.
You won't get that with any of
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 11:26:35AM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
We might disable the RBL based rules in flagging spam; they do seem to
have a rather high false-positive rate.
Whether it's appropriate for the xpert list to partipcate in the
social pressure aspect of DNSBLs (RBL is a trademark
hello,
I know I'm running a software stull under development but I'm curious ;)
I run a gentoo Linux box and there is a package called XFree-4.2.99
available which I build and installed.
Now I have a strange issue:
I can run plain X-Apps and i.e Mozilla just fine and also Gnome-1.4 apps
like
Thank you...
That did the trick... :-)
~Jrn
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 00:51, dave crane wrote:
try numlockx
http://dforce.sh.cvut.cz/~seli/en/numlockx
dave
___
Xpert mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
--
En/na [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha escrit:
should/could be to deal with the spam problem? Or perhaps the sending
IP is a subscriber IP of some sort. They should be using their ISP
assigned mail exchanger.
Just because some antispam nazi says so?
No thank you, I'm perfectly capable to manage my mail
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002 21:30:51 +0100
Luca Olivetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
En/na David Dawes ha escrit:
All I can really say so far without having analysed the data is that
the number of false positives has been relatively small compared to
Zero false positives is the only acceptable
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 04:39, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Sun, 2002-11-24 at 17:42, Michel Dänzer wrote:
it locks up solid when I request a signal to be delivered. Now I'd very
much like to get this into 4.3.0, so I'd appreciate someone pointing
out the stupid mistake(s) I'm probably making.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 11:00:16PM +, John Tapsell wrote:
well, if it works - then good! Hopefully it will piss off the customers
enough that they'll go to another isp, or the isp will sort it out. If a
customer cares enough about his email, he'll use a more ethical isp.
[veering
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 11:00:16PM +, John Tapsell wrote:
well, if it works - then good! Hopefully it will piss off the customers
enough that they'll go to another isp, or the isp will sort it out. If a
customer cares enough about his email, he'll use a more ethical isp.
Wow, you live
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 04:39:11PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 11:26:35AM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
We might disable the RBL based rules in flagging spam; they do seem to
have a rather high false-positive rate.
Whether it's appropriate for the xpert list to
I am having a problem getting XFree86 Version 4.2.0
to work successfully with my older monitor. I did not
have any problem getting 800x600 from the monitor
using Xfree86 Version 3.3.6 and the XF86_SVGA server.
Any assistance in resolving this problem would be much appreciated.
TIA
Ed. Lott
Hi,
Can anybody suggest me a small (less than 5MByte) free web
browser that works on Kdrive and with Java Script support?
Thanks and Regds,
PR
___
Xpert mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
Michel == Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One possibly relevant issue is gettimeofday() [and large -ve
ntpdate(1) time warps.]
Michel Yes, this is a known problem in the X server which has been
Michel fixed in CVS.
OK. Thanks for the followup. I've now confirmed that that is the
26 matches
Mail list logo
