On 2022-06-21 Dennis Ens wrote:
> Why not pass on maintainership for XZ for C so you can give XZ for
> Java more attention? Or pass on XZ for Java to someone else to focus
> on XZ for C? Trying to maintain both means that neither are
> maintained well.
Finding a co-maintainer or passing the
>> I haven't lost interest but my ability to care has been fairly limited
>> mostly due to longterm mental health issues but also due to some other
>> things. Recently I've worked off-list a bit with Jia Tan on XZ Utils and
>> perhaps he will have a bigger role in the future, we'll see.
>>
>> It's
> Anyway, I assure you that I know far too well about the problem that
> not much progress has been made. The thought of finding new maintainers
> has existed for a long time too as the current situation is obviously
> bad and sad for the project.
>
> A new XZ Utils stable branch should get
On 2022-06-07 Jigar Kumar wrote:
> Progress will not happen until there is new maintainer. XZ for C has
> sparse commit log too. Dennis you are better off waiting until new
> maintainer happens or fork yourself. Submitting patches here has no
> purpose these days. The current maintainer lost
Progress will not happen until there is new maintainer. XZ for C has sparse
commit log too. Dennis you are better off waiting until new maintainer happens
or fork yourself. Submitting patches here has no purpose these days. The
current maintainer lost interest or doesn't care to maintain
I tested the match finder changes on arm64 (aws graviton) and results are
quite positive.
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 3:41 PM Lasse Collin
wrote:
> On 2022-05-19 Dennis Ens wrote:
> > Is XZ for Java still maintained?
>
> Yes, by some definition at least, like if someone reports a bug it will
> get
On 2022-05-19 Dennis Ens wrote:
> Is XZ for Java still maintained?
Yes, by some definition at least, like if someone reports a bug it will
get fixed. Development of new features definitely isn't very active. :-(
> I asked a question here a week ago and have not heard back.
I saw. I have lots of
