If only I could find how to modify the yade-articles.bib...
I am so bad with gitlab, it's pathetic... :)
Here is the bibtex entry in case someone has mercy on me:
@article{HUBER2024108946,
title = {Stability and failure modes of slopes with anisotropic strength:
Insights from discrete element
Yes, that sounds good.
I am in too.
Luc
On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 07:24, Klaus Thoeni wrote:
> Sounds great, I am in.
>
> Klaus
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 9:27 PM Bruno Chareyre <
> bruno.chare...@3sr-grenoble.fr> wrote:
>
>> Hi Devs,
>>
>> For your information, I will submit yade to a french
Hi all,
I'll join if possible.
Thanks
Luc
On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 11:25, Jerome Duriez wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I plan to join (on July 21, I guess ;-) ), thank you Bruno.
>
> Jérôme
>
> --
> Chargé de Recherche / Research Associate
> INRAE, RECOVER
> 3275 route Cezanne – CS 40061 13182
Hi all,
Thank you all, specially Bruno, for your commitment to the project. I don't
have any point to make against the migration as long as documentation
follows accordingly for people like me not intensively involved in
development and not exactly familiar with all this software versioning
Hi guys,
I have done some testing this summer on that aspect which might be useful
for the discussion. The incremental increase of permeability is certainly
more "accurate" but it does not change much the simulated behavior (I am
again talking about the stress induced permeability changes I
Hum... Don't think so since I have cgal 4.7 installed on my computer.
Luc
2017-11-02 13:34 GMT-07:00 Robert Caulk :
> Could this be the source of the strange PFV behaviors, Luc?
>
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Anton Gladky
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
t; on behalf of nore...@launchpad.net <nore...@launchpad.net>
> *Sent:* May 11, 2017 6:19 AM
> *To:* Yade developers
> *Subject:* [Yade-dev] [Branch ~yade-pkg/yade/git-trunk] Rev 4040: update
> of the JCFPM particle model with new or adapted functionalities to record
> number of
Hi Janek,
Welcome back.
Very briefly:
We actually recently tackled "rock fracking" problems with Timos, Frederic
and Bruno (just have a look at:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136516091730076X) by
combining the JCFPM and the PFV scheme.
Timos is still working on it but all
Hi all,
On my side, I don't get the 3 different lines:
+Luc Scholtes lscholte...@gmail.com
scholtes1@scholtes1-HP-Z820-Workstation.(none)
+Luc Scholtes lscholte...@gmail.com lucScholtes lscholte...@gmail.com
+Luc Scholtes lscholte...@gmail.com scholtes
scholtes1@scholtes1-HP-Z820-Workstation
Hi Anton,
Yes, it was not intended. I should have kept it disabled as it is still
under development. Many thanks for double checking.
Just because I am curious, did you experience any compilation problems with
linsolv on/off?
Cheers
Luc
2014-11-17 17:22 GMT+01:00 Anton Gladky
Hi Devs,
A great initiative for sure!
I did not reply yet but I would very much like to participate too.
I could present how DEM can be used in rock mechanics for example.
Cheers
Luc
2014-03-19 12:20 GMT+01:00 Bruno Chareyre bruno.chare...@hmg.inpg.fr:
Dear devs,
In addition to the
config -l gives me that:
user.name=Luc Scholtes
user.mail=lscholte...@gmail.com
core.repositoryformatversion=0
core.filemode=true
core.bare=false
core.logallrefupdates=true
remote.origin.fetch=+refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
remote.origin.url=g...@github.com:yade/trunk.git
branch.master.remote
OK, this one (Maybe we could indicate this page (
http://stevenharman.net/git-pull-with-automatic-rebase) to explain why this
method id necessary) already exists, sorry :)
2013/7/18 Luc Scholtes lscholte...@gmail.com
Hi Bruno,
I thought this line:
To avoid confusing logs after each commit
I don't get it, sorry. What you call basic cycle is pull/commit/push. I
don't think this part is difficult (assuming you read from top to bottom ;)
).
I think I can do that!?
You did commit/pull/push. At that point you were already not following
the instructions.
I am pretty sure I did
Hi there,
Could you please allow me to commit on the master branch? My git user name
is lucScholtes.
Many thanks
Luc
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
Post to : yade-dev@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe :
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/yade/trunk
Commit: 976de129337be2333eb08217cb72d0c56c00bb90
https://github.com/yade/trunk/commit/976de129337be2333eb08217cb72d0c56c00bb90
Author: Luc Scholtes lscholte...@gmail.com
Date: 2012-04-18 (Wed, 18 Apr 2012
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/yade/trunk
Commit: 55617e5b17e280994051753afd12ba620327236c
https://github.com/yade/trunk/commit/55617e5b17e280994051753afd12ba620327236c
Author: Luc Scholtes lscholte...@gmail.com
Date: 2012-04-11 (Wed, 11 Apr 2012
not to
confuse new users.
Anton
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 4:39 AM, luc scholtes lscholte...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi guys,
sorry to wake up so late, but, I tried to find info concerning the -j/
--jobs option and could not really sort it all due to my lack of Linux
oriented knowledge
Hi guys,
sorry to wake up so late, but, I tried to find info concerning the -j/
--jobs option and could not really sort it all due to my lack of Linux
oriented knowledge... As I understand, YADE now run 1 thread (job?) per
core. Nonetheless, what would be the command to make it run 1 thread over
Thanks a lot Vaclav for what you have done. Amazing job!
I wish you all the best for your future plans.
Cheers
Luc
2011/3/17 Václav Šmilauer e...@doxos.eu
Dear colleagues,
most open-source projects are either abandoned, or developed forever,
without ever getting to the done state. Yade
Hi there,
I was looking for a way to compute stress in a given subdomain and just
found this thread :-)
My purpose is to have a look at the respective distribution of normal (Sii)
and shear (Sij) stress components in my cohesive assemblies.
Has anybody already tried something? Chiara, did you
Well... I tried to update my profile, but could not find the edit link...
Any suggestions?
Luc
2011/2/7 Bruno Chareyre bruno.chare...@hmg.inpg.fr
Dear authors and contributors,
There is some data missing in the authors page of the wiki. If you are
listed below, could you please update
Hi guys,
sorry for the late reply, but the fact is that I haven't used spherePadder
myself for now and that, moreover, the version which is currently in the
trunk is not working... It is a pity that such a great tool just got into
oblivion, but, as Bruno said, it would certainly be put back if
Hi guys,
sorry to suddenly wake up, but the code has suffer a lot of changes since my
last simulation (amazing work by the way!) and I would like to update my
code too... Would it be beneficial for CohesiveFrictionalPM to follow the
same rule (use of ScGeom6D instead of ScGeom)?
Thanks for your
Sure, you are totally right Vaclav!
I'll try to do something with some graphs for CohesiveFrictionalPM asap.
Cheers
Luc
2010/10/7 Václav Šmilauer eudo...@arcig.cz
Hi fellows,
I received the following mail yesterday from a geological engineer:
I recently found your software Yade on the
Sorry, cannot test it right now, but maybe something like
print(O.engines[5].keys())
would work.
Luc
2010/7/6 Janek Kozicki janek_li...@wp.pl
what is the python command to see a listing of all values of all
registered attributes of a given engine?
For example I want to check what are the
Hi there,
How would you do to skip non dynamic bodies in a loop over interactions?
I tried
FOREACH(const shared_ptrInteraction I, *scene-interactions){
if( !(Body::byId(I-getId1())-isDynamic) ||
!(Body::byId(I-getId1())-isDynamic) ) continue;
}
but, obviously, I missed
to be registered.
2010/6/2 luc scholtes lscholte...@gmail.com
Well... CohesiveTriaxialTest seemed to work well (I was suspecting a
problem with the moment law, but it seems to be ok), but, as reported
earlier, I could not test in depth last revision since I get a FATAL
error
when I try to launch
don't see any problem, except that the automatic timestep is too high. After
reducing it, I see no problem.
B.
luc scholtes a écrit :
Hi guys,
After few investigations about CohesiveFrictionalPM in latest version, I
must admit that I still do not have any idea where to look for, so if one
Well... CohesiveTriaxialTest seemed to work well (I was suspecting a problem
with the moment law, but it seems to be ok), but, as reported earlier, I
could not test in depth last revision since I get a FATAL error when I try
to launch yade...
Pong...?
2010/6/2 Václav Šmilauer eudo...@arcig.cz
: Checking for QGLViewer() in C++ library
qglviewer... (cached) no).
still trying to find out
Luc
2010/5/28 luc scholtes lscholte...@gmail.com
Thanks for your advices Anton.
I found that the main problem (say, not the one due to the moment law)
comes from those two lines, where I initialize
Hi guys,
After few investigations about CohesiveFrictionalPM in latest version, I
must admit that I still do not have any idea where to look for, so if one of
you could have any suggestion, it would be very kind.
1- CohesiveFrictionalPM seems to work well when it is used in basic
simulations
Hi guys,
In order to investigate why CFpm does not work in new yade version, I tried
to compile version 2258 with wm3 features (just did a scons features='wm3'
after a first successful default build), but I got this compilation error:
In file included from /.../build-wm3/plugins3.cpp:2:
Hi Anton,
Thank you for the link.
After few tests, it seems that CohesivefrictionalPM does not work in its
actual version (is it related to Eigen?...). More particularly, it seems
that the problem comes from the part related to the moment rotation law (see
the concerned code below). I know that
in the code you pasted)?
Bruno
luc scholtes a écrit :
Hi Anton,
Thank you for the link.
After few tests, it seems that CohesivefrictionalPM does not work in its
actual version (is it related to Eigen?...). More particularly, it seems
that the problem comes from the part related to the moment
Hi Vaclav and others,
Sorry to ask such a basic question, but I did not really find out what are
the consequences, in terms of coding, to switch from wm3 to Eigen. I saw
that you are waiting for users to signal any trouble when using Eigen, but
what are the real challenges of such a change?
Any
Hi all,
I am trying to find a way to visualize cracks/fracturing process in YADE...
The idea is to keep in memory a trace of each crack corresponding to a brake
of a cohesive interaction (typically, contact point position, corresponding
cross section and whatever else...) and to manage their
Hi folks,
I am wondering if there is a way to avoid contact detections during
simulations, in order to transform the DEM into a Lattice-like model?
For example, given a classical particles assembly with all interactions
defined in the first time step, do you think that it could be possible to
run
revno: 2123
committer: Luc Scholtes sch...@fluent-ph
branch nick: trunk
timestamp: Thu 2010-04-01 16:17:19 +1000
message:
-updates for capillary files (doc in Law2_..._Capillarity and changes in
CapillaryStressRecorder)\n\n -add a feature
See rev 2119 for updates. I tried to follow both of you guys for the
formalism ;). Please, do not hesitate to add comments if it is not clear
enough. As I precised, I did not test the code, and it should be done to be
sure that all these files are not useless. I'm gonna try it, but I am really
Hi Folks,
After an unsuccessful search on the web, I beg your skills about a problem I
face. I would like to store some additional infos on bodies by adding a
parameter to body.state (as Vaclav does in CpmState). More precisely I would
like to store ids of the bodies that have interacted with the
Hi Bruno,
I tried to do some parts of the job (see rev2116). I hope there won't be any
surprises (everything compiles and yade launches, but I did not test the
capillary related code... Hopefully in a near future...).
As you suggested, I removed some of the useless files. CapillaryRecorder was
Hi vaclav and others,
I managed to fix some of the classes below (those linked to capillarity in a
first step). It is almost done but I have a problem when I want to declare a
vector of int (see currentIndex in capillaryParameters):
declared previously like this:
int currentIndexes [4];
with
Yes, you are totally right. In fact, I was expecting some criticisms because
the code does exactly what cohesiveFrictionalContactLaw does. The idea was
to have an updated version of the code with all the components in the same
sources files (say, cohesiverictionalRelationships and all this
Excellent!
Many thanks Vaclav
2010/2/18 Václav Šmilauer eudo...@arcig.cz
2b. Ig2_Sphere_Sphere_ScGeom::interactionDetectionFactor (does not have
the web documentation yet, as no-one has put macros I asked about 5x yet
in place)
I added the doc
2010/2/19 luc scholtes lscholte...@gmail.com
BTW, the idea was to set this larger interaction distance only for the
first iterations in order to have a maximum number of cohesive links at the
initiation of my simulations (within the cohesive range of my interaction
law).
I have already
could cancel rotations.
Jerome
luc scholtes a écrit :
Hi all,
I can see the rotationBlocked boolean in the TrixialTest and it seems that
it could help me a bit concerning the development of my JointedRockPM as a
prestudy before any moment input (yes, I am potentially interested too). I
Hi all,
I can see the rotationBlocked boolean in the TrixialTest and it seems that
it could help me a bit concerning the development of my JointedRockPM as a
prestudy before any moment input (yes, I am potentially interested too). I
have tried to find out where this boolean is defined and how it
2010/1/13 luc scholtes lscholte...@gmail.com
Hi there,
As you will see, I have committed some comments into CapillaryCohesiveLaw
files (2 files concerned). I just followed the instructions given in the
website, however, it seems that every of my files have been committed... I
am a bit
Hi all,
Is there a way to allow the ascii() function defined in yade.ymport to
determine some bodies properties from the same ascii file? By now, the ascii
files contains spheres positions (row[0], [1] and [2]) as well as radius
(row[3]), and would like to define some additional rows for some
Hi all,
Is there a way to access all the neighbors (in contact I mean) to a given
grain? I saw the isNeighbor variable but I cannot find out how to use it
when looping on interactions or bodies.
Thanks for helping
luc
___
Mailing list:
Ok thank you Vaclav. I will have a look at your suggestions. I would like to
do it through python, so I will probably need to create a function with
O.interactions.withBody(id) or O.interactions.withBodyAll(id)...
Just another precision BTW... I have already seen something about Real and
After investigation, it seems that the geometrical model is not contained in
O.bodies.name which only gives 'Body' as an answer, and that it cannot be
access through O.bodies.shape... which is quite strange...
I must be wrong
___
Mailing list:
53 matches
Mail list logo