Hi guys, sorry to suddenly wake up, but the code has suffer a lot of changes since my last simulation (amazing work by the way!) and I would like to update my code too... Would it be beneficial for CohesiveFrictionalPM to follow the same rule (use of ScGeom6D instead of ScGeom)?
Thanks for your advice Luc 2011/1/25 Jerome Duriez <[email protected]> > (sorry for...) > > r2676 gets rid of the use of FrictPhysTrans... for NormalInelasticityPhys > > Jerome > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: > https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-dev> > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : > https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-dev> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
