[jira] [Updated] (YARN-2009) Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Carlo Curino updated YARN-2009: --- Labels: oct-16-medium (was: oct-16-easy) > Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy > --- > > Key: YARN-2009 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: capacityscheduler >Reporter: Devaraj K >Assignee: Sunil G > Labels: oct16-medium > Attachments: YARN-2009.0001.patch, YARN-2009.0002.patch, > YARN-2009.0003.patch, YARN-2009.0004.patch, YARN-2009.0005.patch, > YARN-2009.0006.patch, YARN-2009.0007.patch, YARN-2009.0008.patch, > YARN-2009.0009.patch, YARN-2009.0010.patch, YARN-2009.0011.patch, > YARN-2009.0012.patch, YARN-2009.0013.patch, YARN-2009.0014.patch, > YARN-2009.0015.patch > > > While preempting containers based on the queue ideal assignment, we may need > to consider preempting the low priority application containers first. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-2009) Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Carlo Curino updated YARN-2009: --- Labels: oct16-medium (was: oct-16-medium) > Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy > --- > > Key: YARN-2009 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: capacityscheduler >Reporter: Devaraj K >Assignee: Sunil G > Labels: oct16-medium > Attachments: YARN-2009.0001.patch, YARN-2009.0002.patch, > YARN-2009.0003.patch, YARN-2009.0004.patch, YARN-2009.0005.patch, > YARN-2009.0006.patch, YARN-2009.0007.patch, YARN-2009.0008.patch, > YARN-2009.0009.patch, YARN-2009.0010.patch, YARN-2009.0011.patch, > YARN-2009.0012.patch, YARN-2009.0013.patch, YARN-2009.0014.patch, > YARN-2009.0015.patch > > > While preempting containers based on the queue ideal assignment, we may need > to consider preempting the low priority application containers first. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-2009) Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Carlo Curino updated YARN-2009: --- Labels: oct-16-easy (was: ) > Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy > --- > > Key: YARN-2009 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: capacityscheduler >Reporter: Devaraj K >Assignee: Sunil G > Labels: oct-16-easy > Attachments: YARN-2009.0001.patch, YARN-2009.0002.patch, > YARN-2009.0003.patch, YARN-2009.0004.patch, YARN-2009.0005.patch, > YARN-2009.0006.patch, YARN-2009.0007.patch, YARN-2009.0008.patch, > YARN-2009.0009.patch, YARN-2009.0010.patch, YARN-2009.0011.patch, > YARN-2009.0012.patch, YARN-2009.0013.patch, YARN-2009.0014.patch, > YARN-2009.0015.patch > > > While preempting containers based on the queue ideal assignment, we may need > to consider preempting the low priority application containers first. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-2009) Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sunil G updated YARN-2009: -- Attachment: YARN-2009.0015.patch Thank you [~leftnoteasy]. You are correct. we didnt have that metrics yet. I am now calculating from running apps, so for preemption it will be fine. Kindly help to check. > Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy > --- > > Key: YARN-2009 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: capacityscheduler >Reporter: Devaraj K >Assignee: Sunil G > Attachments: YARN-2009.0001.patch, YARN-2009.0002.patch, > YARN-2009.0003.patch, YARN-2009.0004.patch, YARN-2009.0005.patch, > YARN-2009.0006.patch, YARN-2009.0007.patch, YARN-2009.0008.patch, > YARN-2009.0009.patch, YARN-2009.0010.patch, YARN-2009.0011.patch, > YARN-2009.0012.patch, YARN-2009.0013.patch, YARN-2009.0014.patch, > YARN-2009.0015.patch > > > While preempting containers based on the queue ideal assignment, we may need > to consider preempting the low priority application containers first. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-2009) Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sunil G updated YARN-2009:
--
Attachment: YARN-2009.0014.patch
Thank you very [~eepayne] for uncovering user-limit scenario. Highly appreciate
for the same.
Root cause of the issue is because {{user-limit}} was included with real AM
used. We were internally avoiding this in all places. I have made the fix and
tested in a real cluster.
Main code change is in
{{FifoIntraQueuePreemptionPlugin.calculateIdealAssignedResourcePerApp}}.
[~eepayne] and [~leftnoteasy], could you please help to take a quick look in
this function where user-limit is decremented with queue.amUsed.
Thank You.
> Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-2009
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: capacityscheduler
>Reporter: Devaraj K
>Assignee: Sunil G
> Attachments: YARN-2009.0001.patch, YARN-2009.0002.patch,
> YARN-2009.0003.patch, YARN-2009.0004.patch, YARN-2009.0005.patch,
> YARN-2009.0006.patch, YARN-2009.0007.patch, YARN-2009.0008.patch,
> YARN-2009.0009.patch, YARN-2009.0010.patch, YARN-2009.0011.patch,
> YARN-2009.0012.patch, YARN-2009.0013.patch, YARN-2009.0014.patch
>
>
> While preempting containers based on the queue ideal assignment, we may need
> to consider preempting the low priority application containers first.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-2009) Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sunil G updated YARN-2009: -- Attachment: YARN-2009.0013.patch New test case has an issue. Fixed. > Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy > --- > > Key: YARN-2009 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: capacityscheduler >Reporter: Devaraj K >Assignee: Sunil G > Attachments: YARN-2009.0001.patch, YARN-2009.0002.patch, > YARN-2009.0003.patch, YARN-2009.0004.patch, YARN-2009.0005.patch, > YARN-2009.0006.patch, YARN-2009.0007.patch, YARN-2009.0008.patch, > YARN-2009.0009.patch, YARN-2009.0010.patch, YARN-2009.0011.patch, > YARN-2009.0012.patch, YARN-2009.0013.patch > > > While preempting containers based on the queue ideal assignment, we may need > to consider preempting the low priority application containers first. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-2009) Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sunil G updated YARN-2009:
--
Attachment: YARN-2009.0012.patch
New test case name is {{testPreemptionWithTwoUsers}}
I have mocked the user-limit by below equation. (a very simple calculation)
Defining 2 users, consider user-limit as 50%.
So we can consider user-limit as {{guaranteed * 0.5}}. (Since only 2 users are
there).
Meantime I am testing in a real cluster, and i ll update my analysis soon.
> Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-2009
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: capacityscheduler
>Reporter: Devaraj K
>Assignee: Sunil G
> Attachments: YARN-2009.0001.patch, YARN-2009.0002.patch,
> YARN-2009.0003.patch, YARN-2009.0004.patch, YARN-2009.0005.patch,
> YARN-2009.0006.patch, YARN-2009.0007.patch, YARN-2009.0008.patch,
> YARN-2009.0009.patch, YARN-2009.0010.patch, YARN-2009.0011.patch,
> YARN-2009.0012.patch
>
>
> While preempting containers based on the queue ideal assignment, we may need
> to consider preempting the low priority application containers first.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-2009) Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sunil G updated YARN-2009: -- Attachment: YARN-2009.0011.patch Fixed findbugs warnings.. > Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy > --- > > Key: YARN-2009 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: capacityscheduler >Reporter: Devaraj K >Assignee: Sunil G > Attachments: YARN-2009.0001.patch, YARN-2009.0002.patch, > YARN-2009.0003.patch, YARN-2009.0004.patch, YARN-2009.0005.patch, > YARN-2009.0006.patch, YARN-2009.0007.patch, YARN-2009.0008.patch, > YARN-2009.0009.patch, YARN-2009.0010.patch, YARN-2009.0011.patch > > > While preempting containers based on the queue ideal assignment, we may need > to consider preempting the low priority application containers first. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-2009) Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sunil G updated YARN-2009: -- Attachment: YARN-2009.0010.patch Attaching a new patch in which I am trying to avoid the new api which was added to FicaSchedulerApp to get real am used resources. This can be handled in preemption policy itself if we consider only running apps. [~eepayne] [~leftnoteasy] please help to review. > Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy > --- > > Key: YARN-2009 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: capacityscheduler >Reporter: Devaraj K >Assignee: Sunil G > Attachments: YARN-2009.0001.patch, YARN-2009.0002.patch, > YARN-2009.0003.patch, YARN-2009.0004.patch, YARN-2009.0005.patch, > YARN-2009.0006.patch, YARN-2009.0007.patch, YARN-2009.0008.patch, > YARN-2009.0009.patch, YARN-2009.0010.patch > > > While preempting containers based on the queue ideal assignment, we may need > to consider preempting the low priority application containers first. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-2009) Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sunil G updated YARN-2009: -- Attachment: YARN-2009.0009.patch Thank you [~eepayne]. Nice catch. I missed it in queue level. Also I tried deduct AM used in earlier phase rather than adding back to idealAssigned for other apps. I think logic became simple now. Also tested in a real cluster and saw preemption is kicking in. tried to fix some more jenkins pblms. > Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy > --- > > Key: YARN-2009 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: capacityscheduler >Reporter: Devaraj K >Assignee: Sunil G > Attachments: YARN-2009.0001.patch, YARN-2009.0002.patch, > YARN-2009.0003.patch, YARN-2009.0004.patch, YARN-2009.0005.patch, > YARN-2009.0006.patch, YARN-2009.0007.patch, YARN-2009.0008.patch, > YARN-2009.0009.patch > > > While preempting containers based on the queue ideal assignment, we may need > to consider preempting the low priority application containers first. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-2009) Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sunil G updated YARN-2009:
--
Attachment: YARN-2009.0008.patch
Updating new patch with jenkin fix and AM used scenario.
I added the check mentioned by [~eepayne] in
{{calculateToBePreemptedResourcePerApp}}, but also added back these saved
resources as pre-emptable resource for next higher priority apps to balance
out.. Added various tests to cover the same.
> Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-2009
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: capacityscheduler
>Reporter: Devaraj K
>Assignee: Sunil G
> Attachments: YARN-2009.0001.patch, YARN-2009.0002.patch,
> YARN-2009.0003.patch, YARN-2009.0004.patch, YARN-2009.0005.patch,
> YARN-2009.0006.patch, YARN-2009.0007.patch, YARN-2009.0008.patch
>
>
> While preempting containers based on the queue ideal assignment, we may need
> to consider preempting the low priority application containers first.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-2009) Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sunil G updated YARN-2009: -- Summary: Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy (was: N B ) > Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy > --- > > Key: YARN-2009 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: capacityscheduler >Reporter: Devaraj K >Assignee: Sunil G > Attachments: YARN-2009.0001.patch, YARN-2009.0002.patch, > YARN-2009.0003.patch, YARN-2009.0004.patch, YARN-2009.0005.patch, > YARN-2009.0006.patch, YARN-2009.0007.patch > > > While preempting containers based on the queue ideal assignment, we may need > to consider preempting the low priority application containers first. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-2009) Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sunil G updated YARN-2009: -- Attachment: YARN-2009.0007.patch Yes [~eepayne]. Thats perfectly correct. Updated new patch where we can a clone of the Resources.min(..). > Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy > --- > > Key: YARN-2009 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: capacityscheduler >Reporter: Devaraj K >Assignee: Sunil G > Attachments: YARN-2009.0001.patch, YARN-2009.0002.patch, > YARN-2009.0003.patch, YARN-2009.0004.patch, YARN-2009.0005.patch, > YARN-2009.0006.patch, YARN-2009.0007.patch > > > While preempting containers based on the queue ideal assignment, we may need > to consider preempting the low priority application containers first. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-2009) Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sunil G updated YARN-2009: -- Attachment: YARN-2009.0006.patch Updating new patch after fixing few jenkins issues. Also added nodelabel tests. [~leftnoteasy] and [~eepayne] pls help to check. [~eepayne], i think we can bring this to branch-2. I will check whether other surgical preemption patches are for 2.8. > Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy > --- > > Key: YARN-2009 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: capacityscheduler >Reporter: Devaraj K >Assignee: Sunil G > Attachments: YARN-2009.0001.patch, YARN-2009.0002.patch, > YARN-2009.0003.patch, YARN-2009.0004.patch, YARN-2009.0005.patch, > YARN-2009.0006.patch > > > While preempting containers based on the queue ideal assignment, we may need > to consider preempting the low priority application containers first. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-2009) Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sunil G updated YARN-2009: -- Attachment: YARN-2009.0005.patch Thanks [~eepayne] for pointing out this corner case. Updating new patch. > Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy > --- > > Key: YARN-2009 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: capacityscheduler >Reporter: Devaraj K >Assignee: Sunil G > Attachments: YARN-2009.0001.patch, YARN-2009.0002.patch, > YARN-2009.0003.patch, YARN-2009.0004.patch, YARN-2009.0005.patch > > > While preempting containers based on the queue ideal assignment, we may need > to consider preempting the low priority application containers first. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-2009) Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sunil G updated YARN-2009:
--
Attachment: YARN-2009.0004.patch
Thank [~leftnoteasy] for the comments. Updating new patch addressing the
comments.
bq.f. orderedApps is invented to avoid sorting, correct? If you need to sort it
again, we don't need it.
orderedApps is a list of TempAppPerPartition and comparator is designed based
on FiFo. So initial list is created from the PriorityQueue, and we removed each
entry from top to get the high priority app. {{orderedApps}} has just collected
those apps in order, and then later re-sorted to get apps in reverse order.
{{tq.getApps}} return FiCaSchedulerApp, but we need TempAppPerPartition. So i
think {{orderedApps}} is needed for the logic. Did i miss something?
> Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-2009
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: capacityscheduler
>Reporter: Devaraj K
>Assignee: Sunil G
> Attachments: YARN-2009.0001.patch, YARN-2009.0002.patch,
> YARN-2009.0003.patch, YARN-2009.0004.patch
>
>
> While preempting containers based on the queue ideal assignment, we may need
> to consider preempting the low priority application containers first.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-2009) Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sunil G updated YARN-2009:
--
Attachment: YARN-2009.0003.patch
Attaching new patch with user-limit support.
I think {{FifoIntraQueuePreemptionPolicy.computeAppsIdealAllocation}} became
more complex. I will try make it more simple in next patch.
> Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy
> ---
>
> Key: YARN-2009
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: capacityscheduler
>Reporter: Devaraj K
>Assignee: Sunil G
> Attachments: YARN-2009.0001.patch, YARN-2009.0002.patch,
> YARN-2009.0003.patch
>
>
> While preempting containers based on the queue ideal assignment, we may need
> to consider preempting the low priority application containers first.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-2009) Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sunil G updated YARN-2009: -- Attachment: YARN-2009.0002.patch Thanks [~eepayne] and [~leftnoteasy]. Attaching new patch. Regarding user-limit discussion, i think generally approach looks fine. I feel we can also add dead-zone around user-limit. This can help to avoid thrashing scenarios. (we do need for priority as its kind of direct calculation). I am also thinking case when we ll have a complete preemption use case like few containers coming from inter queue, and few others from user-limit, and finally some more containers coming from priority based policy. I think we might need to improve preemption metrics here. I would like to collect and design preemption metrics module so that we can get clear information about which module perform how much preemption. Thoughts? > Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy > --- > > Key: YARN-2009 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: capacityscheduler >Reporter: Devaraj K >Assignee: Sunil G > Attachments: YARN-2009.0001.patch, YARN-2009.0002.patch > > > While preempting containers based on the queue ideal assignment, we may need > to consider preempting the low priority application containers first. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-2009) Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sunil G updated YARN-2009: -- Attachment: YARN-2009.0001.patch Attaching new patch with few more UT cases, I will add some more cases in next version of patch. cc/[~leftnoteasy] and [~eepayne] > Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy > --- > > Key: YARN-2009 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: capacityscheduler >Reporter: Devaraj K >Assignee: Sunil G > Attachments: YARN-2009.0001.patch > > > While preempting containers based on the queue ideal assignment, we may need > to consider preempting the low priority application containers first. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (YARN-2009) Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wangda Tan updated YARN-2009: - Issue Type: Bug (was: Sub-task) Parent: (was: YARN-1963) > Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy > --- > > Key: YARN-2009 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Bug > Components: capacityscheduler >Reporter: Devaraj K >Assignee: Sunil G > > While preempting containers based on the queue ideal assignment, we may need > to consider preempting the low priority application containers first. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
