[linux-yocto] [linux-yocto v5.10] [PATCH] tracing/arm: Have max stack tracer handle the case of return address after data

From: Zqiang This change is similar to the following patch, it also suitable for arm. [ Author: Steven Rostedt (VMware) Email: rost...@goodmis.org Subject: tracing/arm64: Have max stack tracer handle the case of return address after data Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 02:15:05 + Most archs (well

Re: [yocto] Yocto Zeus : facing error regarding hostapd #zeus

>From the log log.do_rootfs.31340 file, there are the following: [1] ERROR: Postinstall scriptlets of ['hostapd'] have failed. HOSTAP stands for: HOST Access Point Daemon. I could not conclude too much from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hostapd It is kind of a hot spot, as my best

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH] 99-com.rules: fix error invalid substitution type

On 5/12/21 8:42 PM, Changqing Li wrote: From: Changqing Li fix below error: /etc/udev/rules.d/99-com.rules:10 Invalid value "/bin/sh -c 'ALIASES=/proc/device-tree/aliases; if cmp -s $ALIASES/uart0 $ALIASES/serial0; then echo 0;elif cmp -s $ALIASES/uart0 $ALIASES/serial1; then echo 1; else

[yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH] 99-com.rules: fix error invalid substitution type

From: Changqing Li fix below error: /etc/udev/rules.d/99-com.rules:10 Invalid value "/bin/sh -c 'ALIASES=/proc/device-tree/aliases; if cmp -s $ALIASES/uart0 $ALIASES/serial0; then echo 0;elif cmp -s $ALIASES/uart0 $ALIASES/serial1; then echo 1; else exit 1; fi'" for PROGRAM (char 58: invalid

[linux-yocto][linux-yocto v5.10] kernel code for marvell cn96xx

Hi Bruce, Please help to merge this patch into our linux-yocto repo. repo: linux-yocto branch: v5.10/standard/base Thanks, Ruiqiang -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#9868):

[linux-yocto] [PATCH] net: Treat __napi_schedule_irqoff() as __napi_schedule() on PREEMPT_RT

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior __napi_schedule_irqoff() is an optimized version of __napi_schedule() which can be used where it is known that interrupts are disabled, e.g. in interrupt-handlers, spin_lock_irq() sections or hrtimer callbacks. On PREEMPT_RT enabled kernels this assumptions is

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 2/6] ibmtpm2tss: update to tip

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- meta-tpm/recipes-tpm2/ibmtpm2tss/ibmtpm2tss_1.6.0.bb | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta-tpm/recipes-tpm2/ibmtpm2tss/ibmtpm2tss_1.6.0.bb b/meta-tpm/recipes-tpm2/ibmtpm2tss/ibmtpm2tss_1.6.0.bb index 4d9b554..ae8974b 100644

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 1/6] ibmswtpm2: update to 1661

Drop patch now included in updated Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- .../ibmswtpm2/files/fix-wrong-cast.patch | 27 --- .../{ibmswtpm2_1637.bb => ibmswtpm2_1661.bb} | 10 +++ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) delete mode 100644

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 5/6] aide: Add another ids

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- recipes-ids/aide/aide/aide.conf | 94 + recipes-ids/aide/aide_0.17.3.bb | 41 ++ 2 files changed, 135 insertions(+) create mode 100644 recipes-ids/aide/aide/aide.conf create mode 100644 recipes-ids/aide/aide_0.17.3.bb

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 6/6] packagegroup-core-security: add aide and ossec

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- recipes-core/packagegroup/packagegroup-core-security.bb | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/recipes-core/packagegroup/packagegroup-core-security.bb b/recipes-core/packagegroup/packagegroup-core-security.bb index 54b8297..0bddf64 100644 ---

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 4/6] Apparmor: fix multi config build issue.

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- recipes-mac/AppArmor/apparmor_3.0.bb | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/recipes-mac/AppArmor/apparmor_3.0.bb b/recipes-mac/AppArmor/apparmor_3.0.bb index 015205d..d9c3e4d 100644 --- a/recipes-mac/AppArmor/apparmor_3.0.bb +++

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 3/6] packagegroup-core-security: fix typo for mips

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- recipes-core/packagegroup/packagegroup-core-security.bb | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/recipes-core/packagegroup/packagegroup-core-security.bb b/recipes-core/packagegroup/packagegroup-core-security.bb index 6d2dd7c..54b8297

[yocto] [meta-security][v2][PATCH] suricata: 4.1.x add UPSTREAM_CHECK_URI

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- recipes-ids/suricata/suricata_4.1.10.bb | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/recipes-ids/suricata/suricata_4.1.10.bb b/recipes-ids/suricata/suricata_4.1.10.bb index 3f7beaa..bf08843 100644 --- a/recipes-ids/suricata/suricata_4.1.10.bb +++

Re: [yocto] Yocto with xtensa

Hello Jack, I think we do not have support for Xtensa architecture working out of box upstream. Although it should be possible to add it with little effort, but no one has spun patches to do so thus far. Thanks -Khem On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 1:29 PM Jack Daniels wrote: > > Dears, > > I am

Re: [yocto] FW: Yocto Distro Testing Plan

On Wed, 2021-05-12 at 18:48 +, Kraft, George wrote: > Could someone point me to a wiki on how yocto testing/QA/conformance is done? > The Distro Testing Plan wiki seems outdated, and my inquiry to Jose bounced. The wiki is a bit out of date, sorry. We have been working on  documenting our

[yocto] Yocto with xtensa

Dears, I am looking for a way to include sample code for DSP (xtensa) with Yocto/Linux. what would be the procedure to include such a code and eventually interprocessor communication between xtensa core and CPU under Yocto/Linux? Thank you. BR/J -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all

Re: [OE-core] [yocto] Yocto Project Status WW18`21

> We have discussed extending it but we currently only have the funding > for the originally planned 2 years. Really/echt??? Why? ;) Zoran ___ On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 12:33 AM Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Tue, 2021-05-04 at 18:38 +0200, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > > On Tue, 4 May 2021 at

[yocto] FW: Yocto Distro Testing Plan

Could someone point me to a wiki on how yocto testing/QA/conformance is done? The Distro Testing Plan wiki seems outdated, and my inquiry to Jose bounced. Thanks, George (gk4) From: Kraft, George Sent: Wednesday, May

Re: [yocto] Understanding kernel patching in linux-yocto

> -Original Message- > From: yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org On > Behalf Of Bruce Ashfield via lists.yoctoproject.org > Sent: 12 May 2021 16:25 > To: Yann Dirson > Cc: Yocto discussion list > Subject: Re: [yocto] Understanding kernel patching in linux-yocto > > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] trusted-firmware-a: Fix rk3399 build with gcc11

On Tue 2021-05-11 @ 12:14:24 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj > Cc: Ross Burton Awesome! Thanks for sorting this one out :-) Applied to meta-rockchip master. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#53483):

Re: [yocto] Yocto Zeus : facing error regarding hostapd #zeus

> Log file in: > /home/tel/imx_yocto_bsp_Zeus/Yocto_setup/build_imx6ull/tmp/work/ > imx6ull14x14evk-poky-linux-gnueabi/core-image-minimal/1.0-r0/temp/ *log.do_rootfs.31340* Could you, please, attach a log file? Thank you, Zoran ___ On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 2:01 PM rohit jadhav wrote: >

Re: [yocto] Understanding kernel patching in linux-yocto

Le mer. 12 mai 2021 à 16:25, Bruce Ashfield a écrit : > > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 10:07 AM Yann Dirson > wrote: > > > > Thanks for those clarifications! > > > > Some additional questions below > > > > Le mer. 12 mai 2021 à 15:19, Bruce Ashfield a > > écrit : > > > > > > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at

Re: [yocto] Understanding kernel patching in linux-yocto

On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 10:07 AM Yann Dirson wrote: > > Thanks for those clarifications! > > Some additional questions below > > Le mer. 12 mai 2021 à 15:19, Bruce Ashfield a > écrit : > > > > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 7:14 AM Yann Dirson > > wrote: > > > > > > I am currently working on a kmeta

Re: [yocto] Understanding kernel patching in linux-yocto

Thanks for those clarifications! Some additional questions below Le mer. 12 mai 2021 à 15:19, Bruce Ashfield a écrit : > > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 7:14 AM Yann Dirson > wrote: > > > > I am currently working on a kmeta BSP for the rockchip-based NanoPI M4 > > [1], and I'm wondering how I

Re: [yocto] [bitbake-devel] Git Fetcher Branch Default

On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 05:51:24AM -0700, Chuck Wolber wrote: > I got a fetcher failure on go-systemd today, which puzzled me. That > recipe has not changed in ages, and the SRCPV hash is clearly visible > in the repository. > > After looking at it closer, it seems that

Re: [yocto] [bitbake-devel] Git Fetcher Branch Default

On 12 May 2021 14:51, Chuck Wolber wrote:I got a fetcher failure on go-systemd today, which puzzled me. That recipe has not changed in ages, and the SRCPV hash is clearly visible in the repository. After looking at it closer, it seems that github.com/coreos/go-systemd has changed its

Re: [yocto] Understanding kernel patching in linux-yocto

On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 7:14 AM Yann Dirson wrote: > > I am currently working on a kmeta BSP for the rockchip-based NanoPI M4 > [1], and I'm wondering how I should be providing kernel patches, as > just add ing "patch" directives in the .scc does not get them applied > unless the particular .scc

[yocto] Git Fetcher Branch Default

I got a fetcher failure on go-systemd today, which puzzled me. That recipe has not changed in ages, and the SRCPV hash is clearly visible in the repository. After looking at it closer, it seems that github.com/coreos/go-systemd has changed its default branch from master to main about six days

[yocto] Yocto Zeus : facing error regarding hostapd #zeus

Facing following issue : ERROR: core-image-minimal-1.0-r0 do_rootfs: Postinstall scriptlets of ['hostapd'] have failed. If the intention is to defer them to first boot, then please place them into pkg_postinst_ontarget_${PN} (). Deferring to first boot via 'exit 1' is no longer supported. Details

[yocto] Understanding kernel patching in linux-yocto

I am currently working on a kmeta BSP for the rockchip-based NanoPI M4 [1], and I'm wondering how I should be providing kernel patches, as just add ing "patch" directives in the .scc does not get them applied unless the particular .scc gets included in KERNEL_FEATURES (see [2]). >From an old

Re: [yocto] [qa-build-notification] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-3.2.4.rc1)

Hello All, This is the full report for yocto-3.2.4.rc1: https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-testresults-contrib/tree/?h=intel-yocto-testresults === Summary No high milestone defects. One new issue found: Bug 14392 - [QA 3.2.4 RC1] failure in ptest :

Re: [yocto] Recipe Grep'ing

On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 6:25 PM Robert Joslyn wrote: > There is the oe-stylize.py script that attempts to format recipes > according to the style guide: > https://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/tree/contrib/oe-stylize.py > > Last time I played with it, I was a bit disappointed with some