Re: [yocto] uboot.bin and rootfs but not uImage

2013-03-01 Thread Satya Swaroop Damarla
Hi Rudy, Thank you for the basic file... I have a question here... The git directory is already saved on my work pc. What is the necessity to download it again? The reason behind my asking this question is, it is secured and so password is required. So, in order to avoid confusion I already

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/5][eclipse-poky] Refactor handling of SDK check errors

2013-03-01 Thread Timo Müller
Hi Jessica, Zhang, Jessica wrote, On 27.02.2013 23:04: Hi Timo, Thanks for initiating the cleanup in this area that I agree definitely need some work. There're couple issues I'm seeing with your patch set that probably need some refinements: 1. After seeing the error message, if I go into

Re: [yocto] uboot.bin and rootfs but not uImage

2013-03-01 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-03-01 03:53 AM, Satya Swaroop Damarla wrote: Hi Rudy, Thank you for the basic file... I have a question here... The git directory is already saved on my work pc. What is the necessity to download it again? The reason behind my asking this question is, it is secured and so password is

[yocto] linux 3.8

2013-03-01 Thread Trevor Woerner
Given that Greg KH has publicly stated linux-3.8 is not a long term stable kernel, is it worth the effort to support it in Yocto? http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/3.8-is_not_longterm_stable.html ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org

Re: [yocto] Newbie trying to get started

2013-03-01 Thread Trevor Woerner
Hi Paul, I saw your email on the gumstix list but forgot to star it, and therefore didn't get back to it as I would have liked, sorry about that. I too play around with a gumstix from time to time, as well as other boards. In my (still learning) opinion, the gumstix stable build is based on

Re: [yocto] linux 3.8

2013-03-01 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-03-01 11:42 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote: Given that Greg KH has publicly stated linux-3.8 is not a long term stable kernel, is it worth the effort to support it in Yocto? We don't need LTSI to make a kernel worth supporting. We pick our kernels based on the timing of the Yocto release

[yocto] Autobuilder downtime.

2013-03-01 Thread Flanagan, Elizabeth
All, I'm going to be switching, temporarily, the autobuilder off so I can test the new software stack, starting later today, after we get a build of master. This switch will continue through til Saturday 10pm Pacific. This is needed in order to reduce load on the cluster so I can get some decent

Re: [yocto] linux 3.8

2013-03-01 Thread Rudolf Streif
Bruce, On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote: But note, Greg is talking specifically about LTSI, we don't expect more than one LTSI per year, and we are already locked into the LTSI 3.4. However, as far as I understand it the 3.4 snapshot in

Re: [yocto] linux 3.8

2013-03-01 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-03-01 02:15 PM, Rudolf Streif wrote: Bruce, On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote: But note, Greg is talking specifically about LTSI, we don't expect more than one LTSI per year, and we are already

[yocto] Minutes: Yocto Project 1.4 M4 release readiness discussion

2013-03-01 Thread Liu, Song
Attendees: AlexG, ThaddeusL, Cristian, Dave, Richard, Jessica, Nitin, Song Release criteria review: Please see the wiki page: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Project_v1.4_Status#Milestone_4https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Project_v1.4_Status 1. All release criteria has

Re: [yocto] yocto beaglebone build no uImage on DOS partition.

2013-03-01 Thread Rudolf Streif
Edward, Yes, you do need of course a uImage which is the Linux kernel image with the necessary wrapper for u-boot. If you do not have one after your build finishes in path-to-build-env/tmp/deploy/images then building the Linux kernel failed and you should look for error messages. To build just

Re: [yocto] Minutes: Yocto Project 1.4 M4 release readiness discussion

2013-03-01 Thread Martin Jansa
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 08:01:17PM +, Liu, Song wrote: Attendees: AlexG, ThaddeusL, Cristian, Dave, Richard, Jessica, Nitin, Song Release criteria review: Please see the wiki page:

[yocto] Missing GDB thread debugging?

2013-03-01 Thread Gary Thomas
I'm trying to run GDB on my target. When I run my program (actually the Python interpreter) I get this error: warning: Unable to find libthread_db matching inferior's thread library, thread debugging will not be available. I seem to have that library installed: # ls /lib/libthread_db* -l

Re: [yocto] Minutes: Yocto Project 1.4 M4 release readiness discussion

2013-03-01 Thread Burton, Ross
On 1 March 2013 21:53, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote: I think it would be good to finish discussion in thread [OE-core] RFE: make the init manager an image feature (again) and resolve systemd situation asap, otherwise we're risking meta-openembedded release or quality of such

Re: [yocto] Minutes: Yocto Project 1.4 M4 release readiness discussion

2013-03-01 Thread Martin Jansa
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 11:08:30PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: On 1 March 2013 21:53, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote: I think it would be good to finish discussion in thread [OE-core] RFE: make the init manager an image feature (again) and resolve systemd situation asap, otherwise

Re: [yocto] Minutes: Yocto Project 1.4 M4 release readiness discussion

2013-03-01 Thread Burton, Ross
On 1 March 2013 23:32, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote: Can you answer this http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2013-February/036223.html and how this solution helps with upgrade paths? Having split packages can break the upgrade path - say your distro goes from

Re: [yocto] Minutes: Yocto Project 1.4 M4 release readiness discussion

2013-03-01 Thread Martin Jansa
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 11:56:32PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: On 1 March 2013 23:32, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote: Can you answer this http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2013-February/036223.html and how this solution helps with upgrade paths? Having

[linux-yocto] [PATCH 0/2] NTB IOATDMA features for v3.8 kernel repo

2013-03-01 Thread nitin . a . kamble
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com Hi Bruce, I have prepared commits for enabling non-transparent-bridge and Crystal-Beach-DMA/DCA drivers in the kernel. This is needed to implement features in this bug: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2465 I have created a

[linux-yocto] [PATCH 2/2] new feature for I/OAT DMA driver

2013-03-01 Thread nitin . a . kamble
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com This commit implements a new ioatdma feature by providing a config fragment to enable Crystal Forest DMA/DCA (ioatdma) driver configuration for BSP kernels. Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com ---

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 0/2] NTB IOATDMA features for v3.8 kernel repo

2013-03-01 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-03-01 8:05 PM, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote: From: Nitin A Kamblenitin.a.kam...@intel.com Hi Bruce, I have prepared commits for enabling non-transparent-bridge and Crystal-Beach-DMA/DCA drivers in the kernel. This is needed to implement features in this bug: