Re: [yocto] is there a rationale for YP using sysvinit as default init manager?

2019-11-21 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On Thu, 21 Nov 2019 at 22:18, Richard Purdie < richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > We got so far and after looking at the position we ended up I decided > it was easier to switch poky-altcfg rather than change poky and/or OE > defaults. I resolved that bug as "complete" as we now had

Re: [yocto] is there a rationale for YP using sysvinit as default init manager?

2019-11-21 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2019-11-22 at 10:08 +1300, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Friday, 22 November 2019 9:40:35 AM NZDT Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Thu, 2019-11-21 at 14:02 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > don't get me wrong, i have no problem with that, but a > > > colleague > > > asked me what the reason

[yocto] OpenEmbedded Workshop at FOSDEM20 CFP

2019-11-21 Thread Jon Mason
We are proud to announce the inaugural OpenEmbedded Workshop. It is being held on 03 February 2020 in Brussels, Belgium. The day after FOSDEM. The Call for Participation is open now. For more information, go to https://pretalx.com/oe-workshop-2020/cfp Early-bird tickets coming soon! Thank you,

Re: [yocto] is there a rationale for YP using sysvinit as default init manager?

2019-11-21 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Friday, 22 November 2019 9:40:35 AM NZDT Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2019-11-21 at 14:02 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > don't get me wrong, i have no problem with that, but a colleague > > asked me what the reason was for using sysvinit as the *default*. i > > hemmed and hawed and

Re: [yocto] is there a rationale for YP using sysvinit as default init manager?

2019-11-21 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2019-11-21 at 14:02 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > don't get me wrong, i have no problem with that, but a colleague > asked me what the reason was for using sysvinit as the *default*. i > hemmed and hawed and suggested it was for simplicity and reliability, > and that a lot of embedded

[yocto] is there a rationale for YP using sysvinit as default init manager?

2019-11-21 Thread Robert P. J. Day
don't get me wrong, i have no problem with that, but a colleague asked me what the reason was for using sysvinit as the *default*. i hemmed and hawed and suggested it was for simplicity and reliability, and that a lot of embedded systems didn't need the flashy features of systemd, and so on.

Re: [yocto] populate_sdk with my image

2019-11-21 Thread Mark Hatle
On 11/21/19 12:00 PM, Mauro Ziliani wrote: > Thanks. > > This is true for a Krogoth based project? Same class, slightly different semantics. I don't believe src-pkgs existed yet at that point, but dev-pkgs would have. You will have to investigate the class for the parameters.. but general

Re: [yocto] populate_sdk with my image

2019-11-21 Thread Mauro Ziliani
Thanks. This is true for a Krogoth based project? Il 21/11/19 17:40, Mark Hatle ha scritto: populate_sdk uses the same configuration as the regular image, as well as adding "dev-pkgs dbg-pkgs src-pkgs" and optionally doc-pkgs. See:

Re: [yocto] populate_sdk with my image

2019-11-21 Thread Mark Hatle
populate_sdk uses the same configuration as the regular image, as well as adding "dev-pkgs dbg-pkgs src-pkgs" and optionally doc-pkgs. See: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/meta/classes/populate_sdk_base.bbclass Lines 3-11, and 22. If dev-pkgs/src-pkgs isn't inclyding your

[yocto] populate_sdk with my image

2019-11-21 Thread Mauro Ziliani
Hi all. I have a recipe for my image with depends from Qt/Qml recipes When I do bitbake -c populate_sdk myimage.bb the sdk doesn't contains the dev version of the Qt/Qml libraries installed in the final image I managing the bitbake variables TOOLCHAIN_TARGET_TASK and TOOLCHAIN_HOST_TASK

[yocto] Canceled event with note: Yocto Project Weekly Triage Meeting @ Thu Nov 28, 2019 7:30am - 8:30am (PST) (yocto@yoctoproject.org)

2019-11-21 Thread theyoctoproject
BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN VERSION:2.0 CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:CANCEL BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:America/Los_Angeles X-LIC-LOCATION:America/Los_Angeles BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:-0800 TZOFFSETTO:-0700 TZNAME:PDT DTSTART:19700308T02

Re: [yocto] busybox + SELinux (warrior) - reboot issue

2019-11-21 Thread Mark Hatle
I've been trying to find time to look into it, but I've not had any so far. I'd suggest trying it on more full Linux system first to see if that resolves the issue. If it does, then it's simply a configuration and you can use the audit messages to help figure it out.. but the fact it's

Re: [yocto] busybox + SELinux (warrior) - reboot issue

2019-11-21 Thread Yair Itzhaki
Anybody? Thanks, Yair -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] :how to solve the basehash value changed from 'xxx' to 'aaaa' ?

2019-11-21 Thread www
Thanks, The cause of the error comes from the cache of the yocto project. Thanks, Byron At 2019-11-21 17:13:54, "Mike Looijmans" wrote: >Without your recipe source code, no one can tell for sure, but I suspect you >have something like a "DATE" in there that evaulates to a different

[yocto] [meta-gplv2][PATCH v2] diffutils: use mempcpy instead of __mempcpy

2019-11-21 Thread Nicola Lunghi
musl (like uclibc) doesn't define __mempcpy. This patch will replace __mempcpy with mempcpy in the internal regex.c and getopt.c implementation (similar to what is done in grep in this same repo with the uclibc-fix.patch This also render the line: EXTRA_OECONF_libc-uclibc =

Re: [yocto] Is Yocto the right fit for my project?

2019-11-21 Thread Mauro Ziliani
Hello, Yocto is a must for your project, regarding the project evolution. I made a project starting from an intel platform, then I port it on raspberry, now on imx6 dual lite. My application never change, the system services never change. I need to change only the parts which driver the

Re: [yocto] Is Yocto the right fit for my project?

2019-11-21 Thread Mikko.Rapeli
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 01:12:52PM +, Richard Barrass wrote: > Hello, > > I am a lead engineer on project where we run a well-known Linux distribution > on-top of a SBC (Intel Quad Pentium processor based) driving a 27" display. > We have a 32GB SSD to run from, which we partition with

[linux-yocto] [PATCH 1/1] ti-am654x: add the basic scc/cfg enablement

2019-11-21 Thread Jun Miao
Add scc/cfg kernel fragment to build and boot AM65X GP EVM board. Signed-off-by: Jun Miao --- bsp/ti-am654x/ti-am654x-standard.scc | 9 ++ bsp/ti-am654x/ti-am654x.cfg | 185 +++ bsp/ti-am654x/ti-am654x.scc | 8 ++ 3 files changed, 202 insertions(+)

[linux-yocto] [yocto-kernel-cache master]: ti-am654x

2019-11-21 Thread Jun Miao
Hi Bruce, I am working ti AM65x GP EVM Board with am654x soc. Could you help me add this scc/cfg patch to yocto-kernel-cache master branch ? Thanks Jun Miao (1): ti-am654x: add the basic scc/cfg enablement bsp/ti-am654x/ti-am654x-standard.scc | 9 ++

Re: [yocto] Is Yocto the right fit for my project?

2019-11-21 Thread Josef Holzmayr
Howdy! On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 01:12:52PM +, Richard Barrass wrote: > Hello, > > I am a lead engineer on project where we run a well-known Linux distribution > on-top of a SBC (Intel Quad Pentium processor based) driving a 27" display. > We have a 32GB SSD to run from, which we partition

Re: [yocto] Is Yocto the right fit for my project?

2019-11-21 Thread Nicolas Dechesne
hey, On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 10:16 AM Richard Barrass wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I am a lead engineer on project where we run a well-known Linux distribution > on-top of a SBC (Intel Quad Pentium processor based) driving a 27” display. > We have a 32GB SSD to run from, which we partition with

Re: [yocto] [meta-cgl][PATCH 1/2] core-image-cgl/core-image-cgl-initramfs: remove them

2019-11-21 Thread Changqing Li
ping On 9/17/19 4:04 PM, changqing...@windriver.com wrote: From: Changqing Li remove core-image-cgl.bb and core-image-cgl-initramfs.bb * They require core-image-lsb.bb which has been removed by oe-core * Even before LSB support is dropped by oe-core, core-image-cgl and

Re: [yocto-announce] Mailing list platform change November 21st

2019-11-21 Thread Michael Halstead
The window for the mailing list move has shifted forward to November 21st from 4pm to 8pm Pacific Standard Time. (2019-11-22 00:00-04:00 UTC) Moderators please tend to all pending requests today. Thank you, -- Michael Halstead Linux Foundation / Yocto Project Systems Operations Engineer On Fri,

Re: [yocto] Mailing list platform change November 21st

2019-11-21 Thread Michael Halstead
The window for the mailing list move has shifted forward to November 21st from 4pm to 8pm Pacific Standard Time. (2019-11-22 00:00-04:00 UTC) Moderators please tend to all pending requests today. Thank you, -- Michael Halstead Linux Foundation / Yocto Project Systems Operations Engineer On Fri,

[yocto] Is Yocto the right fit for my project?

2019-11-21 Thread Richard Barrass
Hello, I am a lead engineer on project where we run a well-known Linux distribution on-top of a SBC (Intel Quad Pentium processor based) driving a 27" display. We have a 32GB SSD to run from, which we partition with multiple EXT4 partitions to help with potential corruption mitigation if the

[yocto] Device is unable to BOOT or INSTALL with generated .hddimg

2019-11-21 Thread Oriya, Raxesh
All, I have device which has following configuration: - Chipset architecture - `Intel NM10 express` - Processor - `Atom D2550 Dual Core` - Display - `DVI` - Volatile Memory - `2GB DDR3` - Storage - `16GB` **Objective**: Device should run yocto embededded OS successfully What I have done, -

[yocto] Installing a Kernel module.

2019-11-21 Thread Shravan Singh
Hello All, So I am having a little problem in understanding why I am unable to autoload a module in my image. So I made modifications to 1. KCONFIG, MAKEFILE 2. Added a source and header file to driver/input/touchscreen 3. Added a file in /boot/arm/dts/overlays 4. Created a patch and added that

[yocto] Memory Tests in U-Boot

2019-11-21 Thread devendra . devadiga
Hi, In U-Boot I found some generic memory tests commands like mtest and post tests. But I need complete DDR4 memory test with below algorithms: * Checkerboard Test * March C- Test * Neighborhood Pattern Sensitive Fault Can I get any reference code for these algorithms in U-Boot ?

Re: [yocto] :how to solve the basehash value changed from 'xxx' to 'aaaa' ?

2019-11-21 Thread Mike Looijmans
Without your recipe source code, no one can tell for sure, but I suspect you have something like a "DATE" in there that evaulates to a different value if you run it a second later. Met vriendelijke groet / kind regards, Mike Looijmans System Expert TOPIC Embedded Products B.V. Materiaalweg