Hm...
Whenever I do an average of 500, I either learn
something new (small f2l trick or trigger), and I
almost always break some kind of record in a category
(average of 100, average of 10, single, the avg of
500, or something, etc.). When I do these long
sessions (in a single sitting or 2), I lea
dang school is currently eating my soul- no time at all. i do have a question on the zbf2l algs though- how did Chris find them? a program? i know i found some on my own, but i'm not sure i could find all of them on my own in a sufficient amount of time... was a program used? (ron's st
Hello guys/gals, that's interesting. I have been thinking of f2l a bit lately, pertaining to Fridrich f2l and ZBf2l. When I take Fridrich f2l averages just to see how my f2l is, I average around 8-9 seconds- but sometimes I'm "time aware," meaning, aware of the time and going as fast as
I'm in. Wise idea. -brent M_cmhardw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hey everyone,I've been talking to Richard a lot lately, and he really inspired meabout one thing.I think ZBLL can be extremely fast, but we have to set a higherstandard for it. We have to set the standard of sub-3 average forever
think out of the box?
Nah. We need to think out of the cube. :D
yeh i agree.
-bm
Gilles van den Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes I agree with you.
Present results show that the pure CFOP method yields incredible results.
Any change to this method will probab
