think out of the box?....
Nah. We need to think out of the cube. :D
yeh i agree.
-bm
Gilles van den Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes I agree with you.
Present results show that the pure CFOP method yields incredible results.
Any change to this method will probably make it slower I think.
Therefore we need to "think out of the box" and look for new ways of solving
the cube.
Gilles
2007/1/12, richy_jr_2000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: The group has been
relatively mute for a while. The reasons why are
many and varied, and I won't invest any time explaining as such.
The problem in the inactivity is that it screams failure not only
for the ZBmethod. It represents something far more important. This
group represents a group of people that are willing to explore
something new and innovative.
I propose that we rename the group to relate the desire to explore
new methods. I'm fairly certain this will raise the activity in
this group, as well as giving cubers a good platform to discuss new
things. No offense to anyone but the normal speedcubing group is
quite possibly the worst medium available for discussing new
approaches.
I have talked to several people with method ideas that could inspire
a major shift in traditional cubing -- Surely someone wants to play
a role in this.
Best Regards,
Richard
:)
--Brent
---------------------------------
Don't be flakey. Get Yahoo! Mail for Mobile and
always stay connected to friends.
