I also didn't know what to do about the VHF2L column, as I never
really learned exactly how it works. I just put 0%, since I figure if
I don't even know how exactly one uses it, then I don't know it.
I guess I should change my ZBLL %, since that's not really the number
of cases I know, but my chance for a 1 look LL, and even then it's
only an estimate.
I count the chance for a PLL skip after COLL as a ZBLL case, but I
don't count all the cases where I know whether to use the L or R
reflection of an alg on the same RL symmetric COLL case to be more
likely to get a ZBLL solve.
I can go back through and count the cases I know instead. For this
database are you guys more interested in the percentage of cases
known, or the chance for a 1 look LL?
Chris
--- In zbmethod@yahoogroups.com, Doug Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Bob!
Made me sit down and count up the cases I know w.r.t the
probabilities. I was ONE case away from knowing more than Chris (at
least on paper) for ZBLL. I was a bit suprised at the high percentages
here. So anyhow I decided to learn one more case: T1 with edges H.
That did the trick and tipped the scale :).
Anything to bring out our competitive natures.
Not sure how VHF2L would be defined so I'm not sure what that column
really means.
I hope everybody did the case counts with factoring in the
probabilities of occurance. I think that would be a better comparison
value.
-Doug
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/MXMplB/TM
~-
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/zbmethod/
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
