Re: [zd1211-devs] Experiments with the vendor driver

2006-12-31 Thread Jon Smirl
Patch to make the vendor driver, ZD1211LnxDrv_2_16_0_0, build on 2.6.20-rc20. It also fixes what looks to be some definite problems with uninitialized variables. -- Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 2118ac3..624b912 100755 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -11,7 +1

[zd1211-devs] Experiments with the vendor driver

2006-12-31 Thread Jon Smirl
I've ported the vendor driver ZD1211LnxDrv_2_16_0_0 to 2.6.20-rc2. I'll post the patch shortly. I definitely fixed a few bugs that were revealed by using a newer gcc. Vendor driver is working at exactly the same speed as rw1211rw. But I have a new clue, if I tell the driver to use 54M it refuses t

Re: [zd1211-devs] Wireshark/kismet dump of problem session

2006-12-31 Thread Jon Smirl
On 12/31/06, Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jon Smirl wrote: > > I just spent a while with Windows booted on the same hardware. With no > > trouble at all I am able to achieve 19Mb/sec of useful file copy > > throughput. > > Matching the windows driver behaviour is hard, since we don't h

Re: [zd1211-devs] Wireshark/kismet dump of problem session

2006-12-31 Thread Daniel Drake
Jon Smirl wrote: > I just spent a while with Windows booted on the same hardware. With no > trouble at all I am able to achieve 19Mb/sec of useful file copy > throughput. Matching the windows driver behaviour is hard, since we don't have the source. A much more worthwhile test would be using the