Re: [zd1211-devs] Wireshark/kismet dump of problem session

2006-12-31 Thread Jon Smirl
On 12/31/06, Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jon Smirl wrote: > > I just spent a while with Windows booted on the same hardware. With no > > trouble at all I am able to achieve 19Mb/sec of useful file copy > > throughput. > > Matching the windows driver behaviour is hard, since we don't h

Re: [zd1211-devs] Wireshark/kismet dump of problem session

2006-12-31 Thread Daniel Drake
Jon Smirl wrote: > I just spent a while with Windows booted on the same hardware. With no > trouble at all I am able to achieve 19Mb/sec of useful file copy > throughput. Matching the windows driver behaviour is hard, since we don't have the source. A much more worthwhile test would be using the

Re: [zd1211-devs] Wireshark/kismet dump of problem session

2006-12-30 Thread Jon Smirl
I just spent a while with Windows booted on the same hardware. With no trouble at all I am able to achieve 19Mb/sec of useful file copy throughput. With 11g 27Mb is max possible including all of the overhead, 19Mb useful copies is probably as good as it gets. In three hours of copying and measuring

Re: [zd1211-devs] Wireshark/kismet dump of problem session

2006-12-30 Thread Jon Smirl
I sent a dump of this but it is 140Kb and the list moderator stopped it. There are three devices in the dump, link is running at 54Mb D-Link - the router Cc&C - the ZD1211 Cisco - server, hooked to the router via ethernet The two sides are obviously having a great deal of trouble seeing each othe