On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Siegfried Gevatter wrote:
> Back to this, I thought I'd make sense to analyze what this means before
> we do any decision. Please correct me if there's anything I got wrong!
>
Thanks Siegfried for this detailed explanation,
for me it is obvious that we don't get an
No one is getting hurt with 3
I change my vote
lets stay with 3
2010/1/7 Siegfried Gevatter
> 2010/1/7 Seif Lotfy :
> > Here is how i see it. More People use our code the more consultancy we
> can
> > provide even for proprietary.
>
> Yes, but I think you are mixing up "linking" and "copying".
>
2010/1/7 Seif Lotfy :
> Here is how i see it. More People use our code the more consultancy we can
> provide even for proprietary.
Yes, but I think you are mixing up "linking" and "copying".
Proprietary applications *can* use Zeitgeist (be it over D-Bus, the
Python module or whatever). What they
2010/1/7 Seif Lotfy :
> We have a slight issue with _zeitgeist/loggers/iso_strptime.py
> [...]
> Software Foundation, version 3 of the License.
Yes, this is effectively making Zeitgeist LGPL3 (not even LGPLv3+). If
we switched to "LGPL2+", as long as we have this file it would still
be, effective
We have a slight issue with _zeitgeist/loggers/iso_strptime.py
File _zeitgeist/loggers/iso_strptime.py is part of wadllib, which is
copyright © 2009 by Canonical Ltd. It is released under the following
license:
wadllib is free software: you can redistribute it and/or
OK I am waiting for Markus's reply.
Here is how i see it. More People use our code the more consultancy we can
provide even for proprietary. But I also agree on people respecting our work
:)
Code wise from stuff that is being used actively its only.
1. Seif
2. Natan
3. Siegfried
4. Mikkel
5. Mark
6 matches
Mail list logo
