Re: [Zen] Re: [Zen Living] What the Bleep do I know?

2006-08-08 Thread kahtychen
To me, the more interesting questions raised by the film concerns our
interest in using scientific language to prove our consciousness and
validate our physical and metaphysical experiences (think intelligent
design!!). With intersubjectivity looming as the great
epistemological frontier of the 21st Century, and the dawn of the
Enlightenment a dim memory, what fabulous questions are in store for
monkey minds!?!?!

We have lived an eon of reason, what if we're headed for an eon of
faith? What of the language of Buddhism? It is looked to as a wise
Master here, since it's language covers breaches of empirical evidence
with elegant dispassion. The Four Noble Truths are basically an
ancient Rx, are they not?!

This article covers some ground work of quantum mysticism:
http://www.wie.org/j27/what-the-bleep.asp

Excerpt: So maybe the widespread popularity of quantum mysticism, and
its latest offspring, *What the Bleep*, is pointing not just to our
cultural propensity to be enamored by the amazing insights and
innovations of science but to our innate fear of scientific
materialism, which seeks, by definition, to squelch soul or spirit
wherever it finds it.

Regards,
Kahty

-- 
~say beautiful things to yourself~


Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today! 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Zen] Re: [Zen Living] What the Bleep do I know?

2006-08-08 Thread Michael Hansen



I haven't seen the movie (I do, however,have the Ramtha School of Enlightenment DVD -- don't ask me how I got that because I haven't a clue), but this sentence...
On 8/8/06, dkotschessa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

It is only a matter of time before the likes of Pat Robertson and Jimmy Falwell get a hold of it and start using it to damn us all to hell.

...made me laugh like crazy, so I guess it was worth the making of the movie.

I don't see any difference between what is being described in this thread and theFundamentalist museums being set up to prove the earth is 6000 years old. Just two sides of the same coin...



Regards,
Mike



  

__._,_.___





Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are reading! Talk about it today!








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "Zen_Forum" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___



RE: [Zen] Re: [Zen Living] What the Bleep do I know?

2006-08-08 Thread Bill Smart
On Wednesday, August 09, 2006 kahtychen wrote:
Kahty, Thanks for this post.

To me, the more interesting questions raised by the film concerns our
interest in using scientific language to prove our consciousness and
validate our physical and metaphysical experiences (think intelligent
design!!). With intersubjectivity looming as the great
epistemological frontier of the 21st Century, and the dawn of the
Enlightenment a dim memory, what fabulous questions are in store for
monkey minds!?!?

I especially liked your phrasing ... using scientific language to prove our
consciousness and validate our physical and metaphysical experiences.  I
believe it is a good basis for a definition of 'religion', as in:

'Religion is a collection of faith-based concepts expressed in symbols and
language and used to explain consciousness and validate our physical and
metaphysical experiences.'
(And no, Michael, I didn't read that in a book.)

We have lived an eon of reason, what if we're headed for an eon of
faith? What of the language of Buddhism? It is looked to as a wise
Master here, since it's language covers breaches of empirical evidence
with elegant dispassion. The Four Noble Truths are basically an
ancient Rx, are they not?!

I believe 'reason' and 'faith' are not mutually exclusive concepts.  I
believe 'faith' is a superset, and 'reason' is a subset of 'faith'.  Reason
itself (and all its fellow-travelers like logic, mathematics, science,
etc...) are based on faith - faith in the existence and operation of
cause-and-effect.

I believe Science (Logic/Mathematics/Reason) is a Religion based on an
absolute Faith in the concept and operation of Cause-and-Effect which we
employ to help us describe Reality which (as DaveK has correctly pointed
out) we create.

We create reality, we create faith, we create religions (including
Buddhism), we create science, mathematics (why is this word plural?), logic,
reason; we create (not discover) quantum physics.  We, we, we - I, I, I.

When the 'I' disappears, so does reality, faith, religion, mathematics,
science, quantum physics - and cause-and-effect.

There is just this.  (And yes, Michael, I might have read that or something
like it in a book somewhere.)

..Oh yeah, and there is Bill!

**
Scanned by VisNetic MailScan for SMTP Servers.
Visit http://www.deerfield.com/products/visnetic_mailscan.
**





Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today! 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/