[zeromq-dev] ZMQ_SNDTIMEO and ZND_RCVTIMEO

Hi, according to http://api.zeromq.org/4-2:zmq-setsockopt, setting ZMQ_SNDTIMEO and ZMQ_RCVTIMEO only take effect for subsequent binds/connects. Is this really true? If yes, could this be changed to take effect already for subsequent send/recv calls? Best regards Simon

Re: [zeromq-dev] Behaviour change between 4.1.5 and 4.2.1?

Hi, is it possible to do publish the bugfix release 4.2.2 now? We need one quite urgently now. Thanks a lot Simon -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Luca Boccassi [mailto:luca.bocca...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Januar 2017 12:41 An: Giesecke, Simon Cc: zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org

[zeromq-dev] Behaviour change between 4.1.5 and 4.2.1?

Hi, we have migrated from ZeroMQ 4.1.5 to 4.2.1 recently and I notice some behaviour change in some of our test cases. These cases are related to enforcing that some queues run full resp. the HWM is exceeded. Sorry I cannot be more precise at the moment; I tried to reproduce the behavioural

Re: [zeromq-dev] Behaviour change between 4.1.5 and 4.2.1?

Hi Luca, I am setting HWM before connect/bind. I already tried to skip through the git log, but somewhat gave up, since I am too unfamiliar with the internals of ZeroMQ. I am using tcp as transport (under Windows; it does not seem to matter whether select or poll is used). Note: The issue I

Re: [zeromq-dev] ZMQ_SNDTIMEO and ZND_RCVTIMEO

Hi, I would like to know if I can rely on an immediate effect on all platforms & for all socket types. Best regards Simon Von: Doron Somech [mailto:somdo...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. Februar 2017 12:21 An: ZeroMQ development list Betreff: Re: [zeromq-dev] ZMQ_SNDTIMEO and

[zeromq-dev] Why is test_monitor disabled on Windows?

Hi, in the tests/CMakeLists.txt, test_monitor is disabled on Windows. Is this done on purpose? Why? Best regards Simon ___ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org https://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Re: [zeromq-dev] new zeromq binding for Igor Pro

Hi, I don't want to be nitpicking, but in what way is this a ZeroMQ *binding*? There are bindings for the libzmq library for various programming languages (e.g. jzmq for Java), but the programming language here is C/C++. Neither is it a custom implementation of ZeroMQ (such as JeroMQ). The

[zeromq-dev] Releasing libzmq 4.2.3?

Hi, I know I am not the first to ask this, but I would like to emphasize that a release of libzmq 4.2.3 would be very helpful. There have been quite a lot of improvements in master since the release of 4.2.2 in February (more than 400 commits!). In particular, at least under Windows libzmq

Re: [zeromq-dev] Releasing libzmq 4.2.3?

Hi Luca, I think I could assist with the CURVE monitor events, but only after my vacation. I also think that this would be very desirable, but I don't really see why this should block a release. It could be done in the next release as well. The other issues sound more severe. Are there any

[zeromq-dev] Maintainer of clrzmq4

Hi, does anyone on the list know of the state of maintainance of clrzmq4 or has contact to the maintainer? I opened several issues and pull requests over the last weeks but did not receive any response. Best regards Simon ___ zeromq-dev mailing

Re: [zeromq-dev] Possible zpoller issue

Hi, yes that was changed recently: https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/pull/2714/commits/a71f7b04055cb30ef523472f75c981cf02d016a5 czmq must be adapted to that. Best wishes Simon Von: zeromq-dev [mailto:zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org] Im Auftrag von Doron Somech Gesendet: Samstag, 16.

Re: [zeromq-dev] FOSDEM 2018 - ZeroMQ gathering/hackaton?

Hi, I would really love to be part of that. I need to see if I can arrange that. I will check with my employer if they support it :) Best wishes Simon -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Luca Boccassi [mailto:luca.bocca...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Sonntag, 27. August 2017 19:21 An:

[zeromq-dev] libzmq issues

Hi, currently, there are 186 open issues for libzmq on github (https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq ), which is quite a lot IMO. I would offer to look through all of them, add appropriate labels to all issues (Bug, Feature Request, ...), maybe close duplicates or issues that have already been

[zeromq-dev] Version number & release

Hi, the version number in the master is currently 4.2.3. However, there are quite a lot of changes that are beyond bugfixes, so I have the impression that it would be better to call the next version 4.3.0. I would also like to repeat my request from some weeks ago to put out a new release

Re: [zeromq-dev] cppzmq revival and RFC on design goals and supported platforms

Hi Ernest, thanks for your mail! I am not sure if I get exactly what you want to achieve by detaching. Maybe open an issue on github with some code sketch of how you would use that, and/or a PR that implements it? I am not sure what kind of “hack” you refer to. If it is something that could

Re: [zeromq-dev] cppzmq revival and RFC on design goals and supported platforms

Hi Harald, thanks for your mail. Unfortunately, I fear you need to elaborate a bit more on your points so that I understand them. * It seems google is infecting anyone with it’s monolithic build philosophy. Too sad that you decided to fetch gtest. What do you mean by “monolithic build

Re: [zeromq-dev] cppzmq revival and RFC on design goals and supported platforms

Hi Gyorgy, thanks for your mail! Uniform sending could be implemented by providing a free send function which is overloaded for both message_t and multipart_t. There cannot be a member function of socket_t that accepts a multipart_t since the latter is in the upper layer (i.e. zmq_addon.hpp).

Re: [zeromq-dev] cppzmq revival and RFC on design goals and supported platforms

Hi Tomer, did you use the current master version? Building cppzmq with cmakeworks with a non-cmake-built libzmq as well, this is also tested in the CI. As you can see in the CMakeList.txt file, it prefers a libzmq cmake package, but falls back to pkg-config if that is not found:

Re: [zeromq-dev] cppzmq revival and RFC on design goals and supported platforms

Hi Harald, * test framework: Personally I have no particular preference for googletest, and at first sight I think we could go with doctest as well. I agree that not needing a build step is a plus, in particular for a project like cppzmq, which is a header-only library itself. However,

[zeromq-dev] cppzmq revival and RFC on design goals and supported platforms

Hi, Pawel Kurdybacha (kurdybacha) and me (sigiesec) have recently started to "revive" cppzmq (https://github.com/zeromq/cppzmq), the light-weight C++ wrapper around libzmq. We added CI for Windows/MSVC, Linux and MacOS, implemented tests, cleaned up the CMake infrastructure, formatted the

Re: [zeromq-dev] Indentify message sender

Hi, you can query the User-Id in the message metadata. See the example code on http://api.zeromq.org/4-2:zmq-msg-gets Best regards Simon Von: zeromq-dev [mailto:zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org] Im Auftrag von Andrei Bica Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Oktober 2017 15:16 An:

Re: [zeromq-dev] FOSDEM 2018 - ZeroMQ gathering/hackaton?

Hi, I will arrive on Wednesday evening as well, so we could meet somewhere :) I am staying near the Etterbeek Station. I have to leave somewhat early on Thursday, but will be there all day on Friday. Best regards Simon -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: zeromq-dev

Re: [zeromq-dev] FOSDEM 2018 - ZeroMQ gathering/hackaton?

Hi, I am sorry, I won’t make it either tonight ☹ See you tomorrow morning! Best wishes Simon Von: zeromq-dev [mailto:zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org] Im Auftrag von Benjamin Henrion Gesendet: Mittwoch, 31. Januar 2018 11:34 An: Kevin Sapper Cc: Tom Behets

[zeromq-dev] Release new libzmq version

Hi, what about doing a new libzmq release? I am not sure if it should be called 4.2.6 or 4.3.0. There have been lots of changes since the last release in March. I am a bit confused that the master currently specified version 4.3.1, although there has never been a 4.3.0 AFAIK. Best wishes

Re: [zeromq-dev] getpeername() couldn't resolve the peer address with underlying fd achieved from zmq_socket_monitor ZMQ_EVENT_ACCEPTED event?

Hi, I don't know if this solves the problem, but you must initialize peer_len with sizeof(peer_addr) before calling getpeername. Also, it is possible that the peer address is not an IPv4 address. You should better use sockaddr_storage instead of sockaddr_in and check peer_addr.ss_family.