G'day,
I've got a OpenSolaris server n95, that I use for media, serving. It's uses a
DQ35JOE motherboard, dual core, and I have my rpool mirrored on two IDE 40GB
drives, and my media mirrored on 2 x 500GB SATA drives.
I've got a few CIFS shares on the media drive, and I'm using MediaTomb to
On 15 August, 2008 - Tomas Ögren sent me these 0,4K bytes:
On 14 August, 2008 - Paul Raines sent me these 2,9K bytes:
This problem is becoming a real pain to us again and I was wondering
if there has been in the past few month any known fix or workaround.
Sun is sending me an IDR
Hello.
I have a machine at home on which I have SXCE B96 installed on a root
zpool mirror. It's been working great until yesterday. The root pool
is a mirror with two identical 160GB disks. The other day I added a
third disk to the mirror, a 250 GB disk. Soon after, the third disk
On 08/29/08 04:09, Tomas Ögren wrote:
On 15 August, 2008 - Tomas Ögren sent me these 0,4K bytes:
On 14 August, 2008 - Paul Raines sent me these 2,9K bytes:
This problem is becoming a real pain to us again and I was wondering
if there has been in the past few month any known fix or
Here is the output from zpool import showing the configuration of
the pool in case that can help diagnosing my problem.
pool: rpool
id: ...
state: DEGRADED
status: The pool was last accessed by another system.
action: The pool can be imported despite missing or damaged devices.
The
To All...
Problem solved. Operator error on my part. (but I did learn something!!
grin)
Thank you all very much!
--Kenny
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Just an update to this thread with my results. To summarize, I have no
problems with the nVidia 750a chipset. It's simply a newer version of
the 5** series chipets that have reportedly worked well. Also, at
IDLE, this system uses 133 Watts:
CPU - AMD Athlon X2 4850e
Motherboard - XFX
Hello again...
Now that I've got my 2540 up and running. I'm considering which configuration
is best. I have a proposed config and wanted your opinions and comments on it.
Background
I have a requirement to host syslog data from approx 30 servers. Currently the
data is about 3.5TB in
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:29:21AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Which of these do you prefer?
o System waits substantial time for devices to (possibly) recover in
order to ensure that subsequently written data has the least
chance of being lost.
o System immediately
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 01:05:54PM -0700, Eric Schrock wrote:
As others have mentioned, things get more difficult with writes. If I
issue a write to both halves of a mirror, should I return when the first
one completes, or when both complete? One possibility is to expose this
as a tunable,
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Kenny wrote:
1) I didn't do raid2 because I didn't want to lose the space. Is
this a bas idea??
Raidz2 is the most reliable vdev configuration other than
triple-mirror. The pool is only as strong as its weakest vdev. In
private email I suggested using all 12 drives in
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
If you do use the two raidz2 vdevs, then if you pay attention to how
MPxIO works, you can balance the load across your two fiber channel
links for best performance. Each raidz2 vdev can be served (by
default) by a differente FC link.
As a
On Aug 29, 2008, at 7:09 AM, Tomas Ögren wrote:
On 15 August, 2008 - Tomas Ögren sent me these 0,4K bytes:
On 14 August, 2008 - Paul Raines sent me these 2,9K bytes:
This problem is becoming a real pain to us again and I was wondering
if there has been in the past few month any known fix
Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:29:21AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Which of these do you prefer?
o System waits substantial time for devices to (possibly) recover in
order to ensure that subsequently written data has the least
chance of being lost.
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Kyle McDonald wrote:
What would one look for to decide what vdev to place each LUN?
All mine have the same Current Load Balance value: round robin.
That is a good question and I will have to remind myself of the
answer. The round robin is good because that means that
es == Eric Schrock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
es The main problem with exposing tunables like this is that they
es have a direct correlation to service actions, and
es mis-diagnosing failures costs everybody (admin, companies,
es Sun, etc) lots of time and money. Once you expose
Hi.
I took a snapshot of a directory in which I hold PDF files related to math.
I then added a 50MB pdf file from a CD (Oxford Math Reference; I strongly
reccomend this to any math enthusiast) and did zfs list to see the size of
the snapshot (sheer curiosity). I don't have compression turned
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I took a snapshot of a directory in which I hold PDF files related to math.
I then added a 50MB pdf file from a CD (Oxford Math Reference; I strongly
reccomend this to any math enthusiast) and did zfs list to see the size of
the snapshot (sheer curiosity). I don't have
re == Richard Elling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
re if you use Ethernet switches in the interconnect, you need to
re disable STP on the ports used for interconnects or risk
re unnecessary cluster reconfigurations.
RSTP/802.1w plus setting the ports connected to Solaris as ``edge'' is
Krister Joas wrote:
Hello.
I have a machine at home on which I have SXCE B96 installed on a root
zpool mirror. It's been working great until yesterday. The root pool
is a mirror with two identical 160GB disks. The other day I added a
third disk to the mirror, a 250 GB disk. Soon
Ok, I've managed to get around the kernel panic.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Download$ pfexec mdb -kw
Loading modules: [ unix genunix specfs dtrace cpu.generic uppc pcplusmp
scsi_vhci zfs sd ip hook neti sctp arp usba uhci s1394 fctl md lofs random sppp
ipc ptm fcip fcp cpc crypto logindmux ii nsctl
Miles Nordin wrote:
re == Richard Elling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
re if you use Ethernet switches in the interconnect, you need to
re disable STP on the ports used for interconnects or risk
re unnecessary cluster reconfigurations.
RSTP/802.1w plus setting the
On Aug 30, 2008, at 8:45 AM, George Wilson wrote:
Krister Joas wrote:
Hello.
I have a machine at home on which I have SXCE B96 installed on a
root zpool mirror. It's been working great until yesterday. The
root pool is a mirror with two identical 160GB disks. The other
day I added
Wrt. what I've experienced and read in ZFS-discussion etc. list I've the
__feeling__, that we would have got really into trouble, using Solaris
(even the most recent one) on that system ...
So if one asks me, whether to run Solaris+ZFS on a production system, I
usually say: definitely, but
24 matches
Mail list logo
