Hi there
I post this problem in Xen discussion before but with different title, I
thought it is something has to do with the memory .. so guys can you read the
thread first !!
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=76870tstart=0
I tried this yesterday , I brought my friend
Hi there
I post this problem in Xen discussion before but with different title, I
thought it is something has to do with the memory .. so guys can you read the
thread first !!
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=76870tstart=0
I tried this yesterday , I brought my friend
Just a thought, will we be able to split the ioDrive into slices and use it
simultaneously as a ZIL and slog device? 5GB of write cache and 75GB of read
cache sounds to me like a nice way to use the 80GB model.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Very interesting idea, thanks for sharing it.
Infiniband would definately be worth looking at for performance, although I
think you'd need iSER to get the benefits and that might still be a little new:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/iser/Release-notes/.
It's also worth bearing in
Anas,
Are both (IDE and SATA) disks plugged in ?
I had similar problems where the machine woudl just drop into GRUB and never
boot up despite giving the right GRUB commands.
I finally disconnected the IDE disk and things are fine now.
Thanks and regards,
Sanjeev.
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 10:37 PM, Vasile Dumitrescu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
VMWare 6.0.4 running on Debian unstable,
Linux bigsrv 2.6.26-1-amd64 #1 SMP Wed Sep 24 13:59:41 UTC 2008 x86_64
GNU/Linux
Solaris is vanilla snv_90 installed with no GUI.
in summary:
Original Message
Subject:Re: [zfs-discuss] ZSF Solaris
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 07:21:56 +0200
From: Jens Elkner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue,
Nicolas Williams wrote
There have been threads about adding a feature to support slow mirror
devices that don't stay synced synchronously. At least IIRC. That
would help. But then, if the pool is busy writing then your slow ZIL
mirrors would generally be out of sync, thus being of no help
Anton B. Rang wrote:
Erik:
(2) a SAS drive has better throughput and IOPs than a SATA drive
Richard:
Disagree. We proved that the transport layer protocol has no bearing
on throughput or iops. Several vendors offer drives which are
identical in all respects except for
I've upgraded to b98, checked if zpool.cache is not
being added to
boot archive and tried to boot from VB by presenting
a prtition to it.
It didn't.
I got it working by installing a new build of OpenSolaris 2008.11 from scratch
rather than upgrading, but deleting zpool.cache, deleting both
Cannot mount root on /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/pci103c,[EMAIL PROTECTED],2/[EMAIL
PROTECTED],0:a fstype zfs
Is that physical device path correct for your new system?
Or is this the physical device path (stored on-disk in the zpool label)
from some other system? In this case you may be able to
Hi,
I am having a problem running zpool imports when we import multiple storage
pools at one time. Below are the details of the setup:
- We are using a SAN with Sun 6140 storage arrays.
- Dual port HBA on each server is Qlogic running the QLC driver with Sun
mpxio(SFCSM) running.
- We have
On 06 October, 2008 - Luke Schwab sent me these 2,0K bytes:
Is this a design choice with ZFS coding or a bug? Is there anything I
can do to increase my import times? We do have the same setup on one
of our SANs with only 10-20 luns instead of 400+ and the imports take
only 1-3 seconds. My
Do you have a lot of snapshots? If so, CR 6612830 could be contributing.
Alas, many such fixes are not yet available in S10.
-- richard
Luke Schwab wrote:
Hi,
I am having a problem running zpool imports when we import multiple storage
pools at one time. Below are the details of the setup:
D'oh, meant ZIL / slog and L2ARC device. Must have posted that before my early
morning cuppa!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hi all
In another thread a short while ago.. A cool little movie with some
gumballs was all we got to learn about green-bytes. The product
launched and maybe some of the people that follow this list have had a
chance to take a look at the code/product more closely? Wstuart asked
how they
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Boutilier wrote:
Is the following issue related to (will probably get fixed by) bug 6748133?
...
During a net-install of b96, I modified the name of the root pool,
overriding the default name, rpool. After the install, the pool was on
a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/06/2008 01:57:10 PM:
Hi all
In another thread a short while ago.. A cool little movie with some
gumballs was all we got to learn about green-bytes. The product
launched and maybe some of the people that follow this list have had a
chance to take a look at the
Matt Aitkenhead wrote:
I see that you have wasted no time. I'm still determining if you have a
sincere interest in working with us or alternatively have an axe to grind.
The latter is shining through.
Regards,
Matt
Hi Matt,
I'd like to make our correspondence in public if you don't
I posted a thread here...
http://forums.opensolaris.com/thread.jspa?threadID=596
I am trying to finish building a system and I kind of need to pick
working NIC and onboard SATA chipsets (video is not a big deal - I can
get a silent PCIe card for that, I already know one which works great)
I need
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 3:00 PM, C. Bergström [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Matt Aitkenhead wrote:
I see that you have wasted no time. I'm still determining if you have a
sincere interest in working with us or alternatively have an axe to grind.
The latter is shining through.
Regards,
Matt
Speaking of this, is there a list anywhere that details what we can expect
to see for (zfs) updates in S10U6?
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Richard Elling [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Do you have a lot of snapshots? If so, CR 6612830 could be contributing.
Alas, many such fixes are not yet
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008, Tim wrote:
ZFS is licensed under the CDDL, and as far as I know does not require
derivative works to be open source. It's truly free like the BSD license in
It doesn't, but changes made to CDDL-licensed files must be released
(under the CDDL).
that companies can take
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 3:00 PM, C. Bergström [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Matt Aitkenhead wrote:
I see that you have wasted no time. I'm still determining if you
have a sincere interest in working with us or alternatively have an
axe to grind. The latter is shining through.
Regards,
Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ZFS is licensed under the CDDL, and as far as I know does not require
derivative works to be open source. It's truly free like the BSD license in
that companies can take CDDL code, modify it, and keep the content closed.
They are not forced to share their code.
On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 11:30:54PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
There have been threads about adding a feature to support slow mirror
devices that don't stay synced synchronously. At least IIRC. That
would help. But then, if the pool is busy writing then your slow ZIL
That would
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 10:47:04AM -0400, Moore, Joe wrote:
I wonder if an AVS-replicated storage device on the backends would be
appropriate?
write - ZFS-mirrored slog - ramdisk -AVS- physical disk
\
+-iscsi- ramdisk -AVS- physical disk
You'd
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 05:38:33PM -0400, Brian Hechinger wrote:
On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 11:30:54PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
There have been threads about adding a feature to support slow mirror
devices that don't stay synced synchronously. At least IIRC. That
would help. But then,
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008, Joerg Schilling wrote:
While you may not like it, this isn't the GPL.
The GPL is more free than many people may believe now ;-)
The GPL is unfortunately missunderstood by most people.
The GPL is missunderstood due the profusion of confusing technobabble
such as you
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 10:47:04AM -0400, Moore, Joe wrote:
I wonder if an AVS-replicated storage device on the backends would be
appropriate?
write - ZFS-mirrored slog - ramdisk -AVS- physical disk
\
+-iscsi- ramdisk -AVS- physical disk
You'd
Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The GPL is unfortunately missunderstood by most people.
The GPL is missunderstood due the profusion of confusing technobabble
such as you provided in your explanation.
If you don't understand it, just don't comment it ;-)
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 01:13:40AM -0700, Ross wrote:
It's also worth bearing in mind that you can have multiple mirrors. I don't
know what effect that will have on the performance, but it's an easy way to
boost the reliability even further. I think this idea configured on a set of
2-3
Scott Williamson wrote:
Speaking of this, is there a list anywhere that details what we can
expect to see for (zfs) updates in S10U6?
The official release name is Solaris 10 10/08
http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/10
has links to what's new videos.
When the release is downloadable, full
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 08:01:39PM +0530, Pramod Batni wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 09:44:21PM -0500, Al Hopper wrote:
This behavior is common to tmpfs, UFS and I tested it on early ZFS
releases. I have no idea why - I have not made the time to figure it
out. What I have observed is
34 matches
Mail list logo
