2009/2/18 Ragnar Sundblad ra...@csc.kth.se:
For our file- and mail servers we have been using mirrored raid-5
chassises, with disksuite and ufs. This has served us well, and the
By some reason that I haven't gotten
yet, zfs doesn't allow you to put raids upon each other, like
David Magda dmagda at ee.ryerson.ca writes:
The format of the [zfs send] stream is evolving. No backwards
compatibility is guaranteed. You may not be able to receive your
streams on future versions of ZFS.
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-2240/zfs-1m
If you want to do back
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, David Abrahams wrote:
If you want to do back ups of your file system use a documented
utility (tar, cpio, pax, zip, etc.).
Well understood. But does anyone know the long-term intentions of
the ZFS developers in this area? The one big disadvantage of the
It would be
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, David Abrahams wrote:
If you want to do back ups of your file system use a documented
utility (tar, cpio, pax, zip, etc.).
Well understood. But does anyone know the long-term
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, Tim wrote:
No, he's not asking them to predict the future. Don't be a dick. He's
asking if they can share some of their intentions based on their current
internal roadmap. If you're telling me Sun doesn't have a 1yr/2yr/3yr
roadmap for ZFS I'd say we're all in some
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
ZFS is principally already developed. It is now undergoing feature
improvement, performance, and stability updates. Perhaps entries in the
OpenSolaris bug tracking system may reveal what is requested to
David Abrahams wrote:
David Magda dmagda at ee.ryerson.ca writes:
The format of the [zfs send] stream is evolving. No backwards
compatibility is guaranteed. You may not be able to receive your
streams on future versions of ZFS.
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-2240/zfs-1m
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:36:22PM -0800, Brandon High wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Gary Mills mi...@cc.umanitoba.ca wrote:
Should I file an RFE for this addition to ZFS? The concept would be
to run ZFS on a file server, exporting storage to an application
server where ZFS also
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, Tim wrote:
Well given that I *KNOW* Sun isn't making shit up as they go along, and I
have *SEEN* some of their plans under NDA, I'll just outright call bullshit.
I was trying to be nice about it. If you're making stuff up as you go
along that's likely why you're struggling.
da == David Abrahams d...@boostpro.com writes:
ic == Ian Collins i...@ianshome.com writes:
da disadvantage of the recommended approaches shows up when you
da start taking advantage of ZFS to clone filesystems without
da replicating storage. Using zfs send will avoid representing
Bob Friesenhahn bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us writes:
I created a receptacle with zpool
zpool create zbk raidz1 c5t0d0 c5t1d0 c5t2d0
(With compression turned on)
As seen my zfs
zfs list zbk
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
zbk106G 50.5G 106G /zbk
As seen by zpool
zpool list
Miles Nordin wrote:
ic I wouldn't have any serious concerns about backing up
ic snapshots provided the stream version was on the tape label
ic and I had a backup of the Solaris release (or a virtual
ic machine) that produced them.
I would have serious concerns doing that because
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, Harry Putnam wrote:
Probably the wrong move now that its clear how I screwed this up.
I'm thinking something like this might clean things up?
cd /rbk
Starting with:
ls -F .
chub/ harvey/ mob1/ mob1MyBackup.tib
zfs destroy -r mob1
mkdir -p mob1/acronis/022009/
on Sat Feb 21 2009, Miles Nordin carton-AT-Ivy.NET wrote:
da == David Abrahams d...@boostpro.com writes:
ic == Ian Collins i...@ianshome.com writes:
da disadvantage of the recommended approaches shows up when you
da start taking advantage of ZFS to clone filesystems without
da
First, it fails because the destination directory doesn't exist. Then it
fails because it DOES exist. I really expected one of those to work. So,
what am I confused about now? (Running 2008.11)
# zpool import -R /backups/bup-ruin bup-ruin
# zfs send -R z...@bup-20090222-054457utc | zfs
Bob Friesenhahn bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us writes:
You might want to think a bit more before you get started. While
there is an implicit usable filesystem at the pool root ('/rbk'),
there is considerable value with creating subordinate filesystems
using 'zfs create' because then you will
16 matches
Mail list logo
