NFS - iSCSI and FC/FCoE to come once I get it into the proper lab.
From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 11:36 PM
To: matth...@flash.shanje.com
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] IO load questions
Important question,
On Jul 25, 2012, at 7:34 AM, Matt Breitbach wrote:
NFS – iSCSI and FC/FCoE to come once I get it into the proper lab.
ok, so NFS for these tests.
I'm not convinced a single ESXi box can drive the load to saturate 10GbE.
Also, depending on how you are configuring the system, the I/O that you
Hello,
There is a feature of zfs (autoexpand, or zpool online -e ) that it can
consume the increased LUN immediately and increase the zpool size.
That would be a very useful ( vital ) feature in enterprise environment.
Though when I tried to use it, it did not work. LUN expanded and
On 07/25/2012 05:49 PM, Habony, Zsolt wrote:
Hello,
There is a feature of zfs (autoexpand, or zpool online -e ) that it can
consume the increased LUN immediately and increase the zpool size.
That would be a very useful ( vital ) feature in enterprise environment.
Though when I tried
Hi--
Patches are available to fix this so I would suggest that you
request them from MOS support.
This fix fell through the cracks and we tried really hard to
get it in the current Solaris 10 release but sometimes things
don't work in your favor. The patches are available though.
Relabeling
Thank you for your replies.
First, sorry for misleading info. Patch 148098-03 indeed not included in
recommended set, but trying to download it shows that 147440-15 obsoletes it
and 147440-19 is included in latest recommended patch set.
Thus time solves the problem elsewhere.
Just for fun, my
Hi--
I guess I can't begin to understand patching.
Yes, you provided a whole disk to zpool create but it actually
creates a part(ition) 0 as you can see in the output below.
Part TagFlag First SectorSizeLast Sector
0 usrwm 256 19.99GB
Trey,
Thanks for the enlightening info. I was really hoping that this
system could deliver more NFS IOPS out of RAM, but based on your results I'm
guessing that's just not possible with my hardware. Per chance have you
tried any of the software FCoE drivers for OI with your Intel x520
