On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Cyril Pliskocyril.pli...@mountall.com wrote:
I am talking about the process, not the announcement.
What's wrong with process?
--
Kind regards, BM
Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely.
___
Hi, Miles!
Hope, weather is fine at your place. :-)
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Miles Nordin wrote:
I understood Bogdan's post was a trap: ``provide bug numbers. Oh,
they're fixed? nothing to see here then. no bugs? nothing to see
here then.''
Would be great if you do not put a words
2009/6/18 Timh Bergström timh.bergst...@diino.net:
USB-sticks has proven a bad idea with zfs mirrors
I think, USB sticks is bad idea for mirrors in general... :-)
ZFS on iSCSI *is* flaky
OK, so what is the status of your bugreport about this? Was ignored or
just rejected?..
Flaming people on
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Erik Trimbleerik.trim...@sun.com wrote:
I can't say as to the entire Atom line of stuff, but I've found the Atoms
are OK for desktop use, and not anywhere powerful enough for even a basic
NAS server. The demands of wire-speed Gigabit, ZFS, and
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Orvar Korvarno-re...@opensolaris.org wrote:
Ok, so you mean the comments are mostly FUD and bull shit?
Unless there is real step-by-step reproducible proof, then yes, it is
completely useless waste of time and BS that I would not care at all,
if I were you.
--
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Miles Nordincar...@ivy.net wrote:
Surely you can understand there is such thing as a ``hard to reproduce
problem?'' Is the phrase so new to you? If you'd experience with
other filesystems in their corruption-prone infancy, it wouldn't be.
I understand your
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Neal Pollackneal.poll...@sun.com wrote:
Not sure I understand all this concern. 32 bit can use 1.0 TB disks as data
drives. ZFS can use more than 1 disk. So if you hook up 48 of the 1.0 TB
disks
using ZFS on a 32 bit system, where is the problem?
+1.
Even
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Miles Nordincar...@ivy.net wrote:
What have you done to try to reproduce the problem?
Well, if you had posted here steps that fails for you and I missed
this, then I am sorry, I would like to get this somewhere from archive
and try.
However, please don't get me
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Miles Nordin car...@ivy.net wrote:
What have you done to try to reproduce the problem?
P.S. I've read that Slashdot article and all the comments and even
replied some. Plus, I've actually tried to reproduce few things that
they vaguely are able to describe. No
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Brad Reeseno-re...@opensolaris.org wrote:
Yes, you may access the system via ssh. Please contact me at bar001 at uark
dot
edu and I will reply with details of how to connect.
...and then please tell us what was wrong! :-)
--
Kind regards, BM
Things, that
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Andre Lueno-re...@opensolaris.org wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
I'd recommend the following RAM minimums for a fair balance of performance.
700Mb 32-bit
1Gb 64-bit
OK, it probably means 2GB when it goes actually practical. :-) Thanks!
--
Kind regards, bm
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Orvar Korvarno-re...@opensolaris.org wrote:
According to this webpage, there are some errors that makes ZFS unusable
under certain conditions.
That is not really optimal for an Enterprise file system. In my opinion the
ZFS team should focus
on bug correction
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Andre Lueno-re...@opensolaris.org wrote:
Feel free to give EON a twirl. It will only cost you CD and the time to burn
and boot it. Or if you have a VM you can test it there. You'll know reallly
fast if it has enough of a framework for you to add the missing
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Anil Gulecha anil.ve...@gmail.com wrote:
One example is StormOS, and XFCE based distro being built on NCP2.
According to the latest blog entry.. a release is imminent. Perhaps
you'll have better desktop experience with this. (www.stormos.org)
So.Tried it just
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Anil Gulecha anil.ve...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
Which particular packages were these? RC3 is quite stable, and all
server packages are solid. If you do face issues with a particular
one, we'd appreciate a bug report. All information on this is
helpful..
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Anil Gulecha anil.ve...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, NCP's Desktop side components (X/Gnome/XFCE) is untested, and
explains the issues. The focus is on the core.. and it has been so
since the move from Gnusolaris (the older Gnome based Nexenta) to
Nexenta Core
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Joe S js.li...@gmail.com wrote:
EON ZFS NAS
http://eonstorage.blogspot.com/
No idea.
NexentaCore Platform (v2.0 RC3)
http://www.nexenta.org/os/NexentaCore
Personally, I tried it few times. For now, it is still too much broken
for me yet and looks scary.
Hello, folks.
kind of problem with mirrors and raidz.
System config:
— SunOS 5.11, snv_111a
— Service system/filesystem/rmvolmgr is disabled.
Hardware:
— Asus EeePC Box B202
— Two USB 3.5 inches boxes.
If I reboot: mirror or raidz works fine. But if I connect physical USB
cables in different
18 matches
Mail list logo
