[...]
Harry wrote:
rm \-c
rm: illegal option -- c
usage: rm [-fiRr] file ...
Ditto for:
[\-]c
'-c'
*c
'-'c
\075c
OK, I'm out of escapes. or other tricks... other than using emacs but
I haven't installed emacs as yet.
I can just ignore them of course, until such time as I
Somehow I touched some rather peculiar file names in ~. Experimenting
with something I've now forgotten I guess.
Anyway I now have 3 zero length files with names -O, -c, -k.
I've tried as many styles of escaping as I could come up with but all
are rejected like this:
rm \-c
rm: illegal
Edward Ned Harvey opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com
writes:
I recently put my first btrfs system into production. Here are the
similarities/differences I noticed different between btrfs and zfs:
Great input.. thanks for the details.
Gregory Shaw greg.s...@oracle.com writes:
I looked into btrfs some time ago for the same reasons. I had a Linux
system that I wanted to do more intelligent things with storage.
Great details, thanks.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
This subject may have been ridden to death... I missed it if so.
Not wanting to start a flame fest or whatever but
As a common slob who isn't very skilled, I like to see some commentary
from some of the pros here as to any comparison of zfs against btrfs.
I realize btrfs is a lot less
Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com writes:
If you only want RAID0 or RAID1, then btrfs is okay. There's no support for
RAID5+ as yet, and it's been in development for a couple of years now.
[...] snipped excellent information
Thanks much, I've very appreciative of the good information. Much
I've posted this some time ago but lost track of the subject line and
answers.
My zfs machine has croaked to the point that it just quits after some
10 15 minutes of uptime. No interesting logs or messages what so
ever. At least not that I've found. It just quietly quits.
I'm not interested
I have a sneaking feeling I'm missing something really obvious.
If you have zfs fs that see little use and have lost track of whether
changes may have occurred since last snapshot, is there some handy way
to determine if a snapshot matches its filesystem. Or put another
way, some way to
Andrew Gabriel andrew.gabr...@oracle.com writes:
Harry Putnam wrote:
I have a sneaking feeling I'm missing something really obvious.
If you have zfs fs that see little use and have lost track of whether
changes may have occurred since last snapshot, is there some handy way
to determine
for the input.
Harry wrote:
On 11/21/10 Nov 21, 8:43 PM, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
When *.mov file reside on a windows host, and assuming your browser
has the right plugins, you can open them with either quicktime player
or firefox (which also uses the quicktime player).
But I find
I find that at least some kinds of video files when accessed on zfs
server from windows machines will not work. In particular that seems
to hold for quicktime files.
When *.mov file reside on a windows host, and assuming your browser
has the right plugins, you can open them with either quicktime
It seems my hardware is getting bad, and I can't keep the os running
for more than a few minutes until the machine shuts down.
It will run 15 or 20 minutes and then shutdown
I haven't found the exact reason for it.
Or really any thing in logs that seems like a reason.
It may be because I don't
Toby Thain t...@telegraphics.com.au writes:
On 27/10/10 3:14 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
It seems my hardware is getting bad, and I can't keep the os running
for more than a few minutes until the machine shuts down.
It will run 15 or 20 minutes and then shutdown
I haven't found the exact
Krunal Desai mov...@gmail.com writes:
I believe he meant a memory stress test, i.e. booting with a
memtest86+ CD and seeing if it passed. Even if the memory is OK, the
stress from that test may expose defects in the power supply or other
components.
Your CPU temperature is 56C, which is not
Toby Thain t...@telegraphics.com.au writes:
On 27/10/10 4:21 PM, Krunal Desai wrote:
I believe he meant a memory stress test, i.e. booting with a
memtest86+ CD and seeing if it passed.
Correct. The POST tests are not adequate.
Got it. Thank you.
Short of doing such a test, I have
If I were to decide my current setup is too problem beset to continue
using it, is there a guide or some good advice I might employ to scrap
it out and build something newer and better in the old roomy midtower?
I don't mean the hardware part, although I no doubt will need advice
right through
Krunal Desai mov...@gmail.com writes:
With an A64, I think a thermal shutdown would instantly halt CPU
execution, removing the chance to write any kind of log message.
memtest will report any errors in RAM; perhaps when the ARC expands to
the upper-stick of memory it hits the bad bytes and
Peter Jeremy peter.jer...@alcatel-lucent.com writes:
It seems there ought to be something, some kind of evidence and clues
if I only knew how to look for them, in the logs.
Serious hardware problems are unlikely to be in the logs because the
system will die before it can write the error to
Peter Jeremy peter.jer...@alcatel-lucent.com writes:
See the archives for lots more discussion on suggested systems for ZFS.
Any suggested search stings? Maybe at search.gmane.org
It would be too lucky to expect someone has a list of some good (up to
date) setups a home NAS fellow could be
Mike Gerdts mger...@gmail.com writes:
[...]
Thanks for suggestions and I have closed it all up to see if there was
a difference.
Perhaps this belongs somewhere other than zfs-discuss - it has nothing
to do with zfs.
Yes... it does, It started out much nearer to belonging here.
Not sure now
Cindy Swearingen cindy.swearin...@oracle.com writes:
Hi Harry,
Generally, you need to use zpool clear to clear the pool errors, but I
can't reproduce the removed files reappearing in zpool status on my own
system when I corrupt data so I'm not sure this will help. Some other
larger problem
Ian Collins i...@ianshome.com writes:
On 10/21/10 03:47 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
build 133
zpool version 22
I'm getting:
zpool status:
NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
z3 DEGRADED 0 0 167
mirror-0 DEGRADED 0 0 334
build 133
zpool version 22
I'm getting:
zpool status:
NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
z3 DEGRADED 0 0 167
mirror-0 DEGRADED 0 0 334
c5d0DEGRADED 0 0 335 too many errors
c6d0DEGRADED 0
Ian Collins i...@ianshome.com writes:
[...]
I'm kind of having a brain freeze about this:
So what are the standard tests or cmds to run to collect enough data
to try to make a determination of what the problem is?
Your motherboard manual would be the best place to look, it sounds
like
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes:
[...]
I can't get X up ... it just went to a black screen, after seeing the
main login screen, logging in to consol and calling:
WHOOPS, omitted some information here...
Calling:
`startx /usr/bin/dbus-launch --exit-with-session gnome-session' from
Osol b134
I'm experiencing a forced shutdown of a machine.
It is proceeded with a number of beeps in a steady pattern like
beep beep beep beep beep beep
And onward. 2 beeps pause 2 beeps pause... etc.
The beeps are the same tone on each set of beeps but each
Cassandra Pugh cp...@pppl.gov writes:
I am trying to set this up as an automount.
Currently I am trying to set mounts for each area, but I have a lot to
mount.
When I run showmount -e nfs_server I do see all of the shared directories.
I ran into this same problem some mnths ago... I can't
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes:
I'm seeing a really big (to big to be excused lightly) difference with
the 2 zfs native methods zpool and rpool
Typo alert: The above line should have read:
the 2 zfs native methods ZPOOL list and ZFS list
compared to 2 native unix
Erik Trimble erik.trim...@oracle.com writes:
Do you think it would be a problem having a second sata card in a PCI
slot? That would be 8 sata ports in all, since the A-open AK86
motherboard has 2 built in. Or should I swap out the 2prt for the 4
prt. I really only need 2 more prts
Will Murnane will.murn...@gmail.com writes:
In short, there are many commands because there are many answers, and
many questions. No single tool has all the information available to
it.
Thanks for such a complete answer... and nicely put too.
___
Will Murnane will.murn...@gmail.com writes:
It's important to consider what you want this data for. Considering
upgrading your storage to get more room? Check out zpool list.
Need to know whether accounting or engineering is using more space?
Look at zfs list. Looking at a sparse or
Erik Trimble erik.trim...@oracle.com writes:
Since we're talking about an old PCI slot here, I'd say there's really
two good options:
A SiliconImage Sil3114-based card, which is a 32-bit/66Mhz card, with
4 SATA-1 ports, usually for $25
A Supermicro AOC-SAT2-MV8 card, which is a
Tim Cook t...@cook.ms writes:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
Eric D. Mudama edmud...@bounceswoosh.org writes:
On Thu, Apr 15 at 23:57, Günther wrote:
hello
if you are looking for pci-e (8x), i would recommend sas/sata controller
with lsi 1068E
Eric D. Mudama edmud...@bounceswoosh.org writes:
On Thu, Apr 15 at 23:57, Günther wrote:
hello
if you are looking for pci-e (8x), i would recommend sas/sata controller
with lsi 1068E sas chip. they are nearly perfect with opensolaris.
For just a bit more, you can get the LSI SAS 9211-9i card
Brandon High bh...@freaks.com writes:
[...]
Harry wrote:
So having some data on rpool (besides the OS I mean) is not
necessarily a bad thing then?
Daniel C answered:
Not at all; laptops would be screwed otherwise.
Brandon H. responded:
The pool will resilver faster if it's got less data
Daniel Carosone d...@geek.com.au writes:
For Harry's benefit, the recipe we're talking about here is roughly as
follows. Your pools z2 and z3, we will merge into z2. diskx and
disky are the current members of z3.
[...] snipped very handy outline
Thank you. That kind of walk through is
Brandon High bh...@freaks.com writes:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
But as someone suggested it might be better to get two more bigger
drives. 1t or 1.5t would handle all my data on one pair.
Then I guess after moving all the data to a single zpool
Daniel Carosone d...@geek.com.au writes:
[...] snipped welcome info... thanks.
Oh, another thing, just to make sure before you start, since this is
evidently older hardware: are you running a 32-bit or 64-bit kernel?
The 32-bit kernel won't use drives larger than 1TB.
Its an athlon64 so I'm
David Dyer-Bennet d...@dd-b.net writes:
[...]
Am I way wrong on this, and further I'm curious if it would make more
versatile use of the space if I were to put the mirrored pairs into
one big pool containing 3 mirrored pairs (6 discs)
Well, my own thinking doesn't consider that adequate for
Bob Friesenhahn bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us writes:
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010, Harry Putnam wrote:
Am I way wrong on this, and further I'm curious if it would make more
versatile use of the space if I were to put the mirrored pairs into
one big pool containing 3 mirrored pairs (6 discs)
Besides
Richard Jahnel rich...@ellipseinc.com writes:
[...]
Perhaps mirrored sets with daily snapshots and a knowedge of how to
mount snapshots as clones so that you can pull a copy of that file
you deleted 3 days ago. :)
I've been doing that with the default auto snapshot setup, but hadn't
noticed
Bob Friesenhahn bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us writes:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010, Harry Putnam wrote:
Am I way wrong on this, and further I'm curious if it would make more
versatile use of the space if I were to put the mirrored pairs into
one big pool containing 3 mirrored pairs (6 discs)
Besides
Daniel Carosone d...@geek.com.au writes:
Thanks for the input.. very helpful.
[...]
No, as above. You might consider new disks for a new rpool (say, ssd
with some zil or l2arc) and reusing the current disks for data if
they're the same as the other data disks.
Would you mind expanding the
When I started using zfs a while back, I got the impression that
setting my home server up with mirror sets rather than some kind of
zraid would offer the most reliable setup for my data.
My data is just what you'd expect on a home lan... no real commercial
value involved.
I've since created 2
mingli liming...@gmail.com writes:
Thank Erik, and I will try it, but the new question is that the root
of the NFS server mapped as nobody at the NFS client.
For this issue, I set up a new test NFS server and NFS client, and
with the same option, at this test environment, the file owner
Hoping to hear from someone who has similar equipment:
athlon64 3400+ - abit motherboard (unknown model)
The mobo has 2 built in sata controllers, probably the older 1.5 gb
kind.
And a pci adaptic 1205a (two sata ports [internal], also 1.5 gb)
I want to install a different pci sata controller
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes:
Ethan notet...@gmail.com writes:
Assuming your drives support SMART, I'd install smartmontools and see if
there are any SMART errors on the drive. While the absence of SMART errors
[...]
I've had trouble getting smartmontools to work with some of my
Just to apologize
This not only sounds lame but IS pretty lame.
Somehow in reading the output of `zpool status POOL', I just blew right
by the URL included there:
http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-9P
Which has quite a decent discussion of what it means.
Ethan notet...@gmail.com writes:
Assuming your drives support SMART, I'd install smartmontools and see if
there are any SMART errors on the drive. While the absence of SMART errors
[...]
I've had trouble getting smartmontools to work with some of my
controllers/drives in opensolaris, and
What to do with a status report like the one included below?
What does it mean to have an unrecoverable error but no data errors?
Is it just a matter of `clearing' this device? But what would have
prompted such a report then?
Also note the numeral 7 in the CKSUM column for device c3d1s0.
Bob Friesenhahn bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us writes:
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010, Harry Putnam wrote:
What to do with a status report like the one included below?
What does it mean to have an unrecoverable error but no data errors?
I think that this summary means that the zfs scrub did
Christine Tran christine.t...@gmail.com writes:
OOps, I may have looked at the wrong bart.
I think he meant this BART:
http://blogs.sun.com/gbrunett/entry/automating_solaris_10_file_integrity
I'm going to make one quick comment about this, despite better
judgment to probably keep quiet. I
Brandon High bh...@freaks.com writes:
Someone pointed out that you can use bart, but that also scans the
directories. It might do what you want, but it doesn't work at the zpool /
zfs level, just at the file level layer.
Apparently I missed any suggestion about bart, but looking it up just
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes:
At just a quick read, it really just sounds like rsync, after its been in a
severe wreck and was badly crippled.
OOps, I may have looked at the wrong bart. One of the first hits
google turned up was:
http://www.zhornsoftware.co.uk/bart/index.html
Matt Cowger mcow...@salesforce.com writes:
zfs list | grep '@'
zpool/f...@1154758324G - 461G -
zpool/f...@1208482 6.94G - 338G -
zpool/f...@daily.netbackup 1.07G - 344G -
zpool/f...@1154758
This may be a bit dimwitted since I don't really understand how
snapshots work. I mean the part concerning COW (copy on right) and
how it takes so little room.
But here I'm not asking about that.
It appears to me that the default snapshot setup shares some aspects
of a vcs (version control
Matt Cowger mcow...@salesforce.com writes:
This is totally doable, and a reasonable use of zfs snapshots - we
do some similar things.
Good, thanks for the input.
You can easily determine if the snapshot has changed by checking the
output of zfs list for the snapshot.
Do you mean to just
Erik Trimble erik.trim...@sun.com writes:
[...]
The Warning only applies to this circumstance: if you've upgraded
from an older build, then upgrading the zpool /may/ mean that you will
NOT be able to reboot to the OLDER build and still read the
now-upgraded zpool.
Lots of good details
David Dyer-Bennet d...@dd-b.net writes:
On 3/9/2010 4:57 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
Also - it appears `zpool scrub -s z3' doesn't really do anything.
The status report above is taken immediately after a scrub command.
The `scub -s' command just returns the prompt... no output and
apparently
Andrew Daugherity adaugher...@tamu.edu writes:
And I update the sharenfs option with rw,ro...@100.198.100.0/24,
it works fine, and the NFS client can do the write without error.
Thanks.
I've found that when using hostnames in the sharenfs line, I had to use
the FQDN; the short hostname
Running b133
When you see this line in a `zpool status' report:
status: The pool is formatted using an older on-disk format. The
pool can still be used, but some features are unavailable.
Is it safe and effective to heed the advice given in next line:
action: Upgrade the pool
[I hope this isn't a repost double whammy. I posted this message
under `Message-ID: 87fx4ai5sp@newsguy.com' over 15 hrs ago but
it never appeared on my nntp server (gmane) far as I can see]
I'm a little at a loss here as to what to do about these two errors
that turned up during a scrub.
I'm a little at a loss here as to what to do about these two errors
that turned up during a scrub.
The discs involved are a matched pair in mirror mode.
zpool status -v z3 (wrapped for mail):
---- ---=--- -
scrub: scrub completed after
[First, a brief apology. I inadvertently posted this message to the
`general' group when it should have been to the `zfs' group.
In that last few days I seem to be all thumbs when posting.. and have
created several bumbling posts to opensolaris lists.
]
summary:
A zfs fs set with smb and nfs
Cindy Swearingen cindy.swearin...@sun.com writes:
Hi Harry,
Reviewing other postings where permanent errors where found on
redundant ZFS configs, one was resolved by re-running the zpool scrub
and one
resolved itself because the files with the permanent errors were most
likely temporary
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes:
[Note: This is a repost of question posted about 1.5 days ago that
has never appeared on the group.. at least not on my server (gmane).
Sorry if it ends up being a double whammy]
Apparently I missed two informative answers by:
Henrik J. Bob F.
Thanks
[Note: This is a repost of question posted about 1.5 days ago that
has never appeared on the group.. at least not on my server (gmane).
Sorry if it ends up being a double whammy]
Working from a remote linux machine on a zfs fs that is an nfs mounted
share (set for nfs availability on zfs server,
Working from a remote linux machine on a zfs fs that is an nfs mounted
share (set for nfs availability on zfs server, mounted nfs on linux);
I've been noticing a certain kind of sloth when messing with files.
What I see: After writing a file it seems to take the fs too long to
be able to
I think I asked this before but apparently have lost track of the
answers I got.
I'm wanting a general rule of thumb for how often to `scrub'.
My setup is a home NAS and general zfs server so it does not see heavy
use.
I'm up to build 129 and do update fairly often, just the last few
builds
I've been running mirrored disks on several pairs of disks. Mostly on
the advice of old timers here.
I wondered if I were to do something like
`rm -rf /$SomeUnexpectedlyEmptyVar' flattening and removing `/',
would I be able to retrieve it from the mirror?
I know about snapshots etc... but
As just a home tinkerer with small needs... I've already run into
situations where I've created a zfs fs for some purpose... and mnths
later forgotten what it was for or supposed to do or hold.
I may recognize the files and directories... but have forgotten why
its in this particular fs as
David Dyer-Bennet d...@dd-b.net writes:
On Tue, October 6, 2009 19:02, Harry Putnam wrote:
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes:
[...]
Trying my best shot...:
zfs set use:use to mirror rhosts public_html z3
Egad the `=' somehow went right past me
Sorry for the line noise.
Glad I
I'm guessing there is some mechanism for this and I'm just slow on
picking up on it... is there a way to make annotations about a zpools
structure or intended use .. that sort of stuff... that shows up in
`zfs list' or some other command?
I guess the next step would be a way to show all
Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.com writes:
On Oct 6, 2009, at 11:58 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
I'm guessing there is some mechanism for this and I'm just slow on
picking up on it... is there a way to make annotations about a zpools
structure or intended use .. that sort of stuff
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes:
[...]
Trying my best shot...:
zfs set use:use to mirror rhosts public_html z3
Egad the `=' somehow went right past me
Sorry for the line noise.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
Scott Laird sc...@sigkill.org writes:
Checksum all of the files using something like md5sum and see if
they're actually identical. Then test each step of the copy and see
which one is corrupting your files.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Harry Putnamrea...@newsguy.com wrote:
[...]
I
I would like some input about the use of zfs snapshot.
The Auto snapshot is nice on rpool but in some of the other zfs fs
I've created that kind of frequency doesn't seem necessary.
However generating my own cron setup for a dozen or so fs to create
snapshots, maybe only when data is
During the course of backup I had occassion to copy a number of
quicktime video (*.mov) files to zfs server disk.
Once there... navigating to them with quicktime player and opening
results in a failure that (From windows Vista laptop) says:
error --43: A file could not be found
Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.com writes:
You can only send/receive snapshots. However, on the receiving end,
there will also be a dataset of the name you choose. Since you didn't
share what commands you used, it is pretty impossible for us to
speculate what you might have tried.
I
Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com writes:
Once the data is copied you can delete the snapshots that will then
exist on both pools.
That's the part right there that wasn't apparent.
That
zfs send z1/someth...@snap |zfs receive z2/someth...@snap
Would also create z2/something
If you have
Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org writes:
This will probably get me bombed with napalm but I often just
use star from Jörg Schilling because its dead easy :
star -copy -p -acl -sparse -dump -C old_dir . new_dir
and you're done.[1]
So long as you have both the new and the old
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling) writes:
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org writes:
This will probably get me bombed with napalm but I often just
use star from Jörg Schilling because its dead easy :
star -copy -p -acl
Reading various bits of google output about send/receive I'm starting
to wonder if that process is maybe the wrong way to go at what I want
to do.
I have a filesystem z1/projects I want to remove it from the z1 pool
and put it in a z2 pool ending up with z2/projects. With all the same
data,
I think this has probably been discussed here.. but I'm getting
confused about how to determine actual disk usage of zfs filesystems.
Here is an example:
$ du -sb callisto
46744 callisto
$ du -sb callisto/.zfs/snapshot
86076 callisto/.zfs/snapshot
Two questions then.
I do need to add
cindy.swearin...@sun.com writes:
Hi Harry,
Are you attempting this change when logged in as yourself or
as root?
my user
The top section of this procedure describes how to add yourself
to zfssnap role. Otherwise, if you are doing this step as a
non-root user, it probably won't work.
my
I thought I recalled reading somewhere that in the situation where you
have several zfs filesystems under one top level directory like this:
rpool
rpool/ROOT/osol-112
rpool/export
rpool/export/home
rpool/export/home/reader
you could do a shapshot encompassing everything below zpool instead of
Darren J Moffat darr...@opensolaris.org writes:
Harry Putnam wrote:
I thought I recalled reading somewhere that in the situation where you
have several zfs filesystems under one top level directory like this:
rpool
rpool/ROOT/osol-112
rpool/export
rpool/export/home
rpool/export/home
[...]
Well yes actually you aren't looking for the snapshots the correct way.
[...]
No difference, and there is no rpool/dump
rpool/export
rpool/export/home
rpool/export/home/reader
under either snapshot... not to mention all the other
[...]
Richard wrote:
NB, the user and group quotas are stored as properties, but get all does
not return them. So it is not a true statement that get all
returns all of
the properties.
Darren M responded:
There are are other hidden properties too.
'zfs get all' should be returning the
dick hoogendijk d...@nagual.nl writes:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:38:18 -0500
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
How to turn off the timeslider snapshots on certain file systems?
http://wikis.sun.com/display/OpenSolarisInfo/How+to+Manage+the+Automatic+ZFS+Snapshot+Service
The first steps
How can I list out all the properties available for a filesystem?
Banging away in man zfs seems to be going nowhere pretty fast.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
James C. McPherson james.mcpher...@sun.com writes:
[...]
Is zfs get all datasetname not helping?
[...]
Gack... quite the reverse
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
James C. McPherson james.mcpher...@sun.com writes:
your original question was somewhat vague - could you clarify
what it is you need to find out?
I wanted to see a list of all the properties available to zfs on a
filesystem.
Your answer was very helpful... thanks My quick reply may not
There is a lot more about snapshots and backup schemes that I don't
know than there is that I do know... My needs are pretty simple and
small compared to some of the heavy users here, but I'd like to run
just the rough idea by the group.
One backup I need to make is from to linux online servers
cindy.swearin...@sun.com writes:
[...]
# zfs list -rt snapshot z3/www
[...]
Yeah... now were talking thanks
I'm still a little curious though as to why
`zfs list -t snapshot'
By itself without a dataset, only lists snapshots under z3/www
I understand about the `-r recursive' but
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes:
cindy.swearin...@sun.com writes:
[...]
# zfs list -rt snapshot z3/www
[...]
Yeah... now were talking thanks
I'm still a little curious though as to why
`zfs list -t snapshot'
By itself without a dataset, only lists snapshots under z3/www
I've been very inactive on opensolaris for a while and have forgotten a
discouraging amount of what little I knew.
I want to get back using the snapshot capability of zfs and am having
a time figuring out how to use zfs list -t snapshot.
man zfs shows:
zfs list [-rH] [-o property[,...]] [-t
How can I make zfs give some shorter kind of names to the auto snapshots
it takes.
I'd like to alter the date string and shorten like this:
zfs-auto-snap:frequent-2009-04-15-16:30
Would become:
a:freq-041509_1630
That's less than 1/2 the 40 characters the auto process generates.
I find
Tim Foster tim.fos...@sun.com writes:
Hope this helps,
Yes and a good bunch of info there... thanks.
Looks way to complicated just sooth line wrapping in some
circumstances. Thanks for the walk thru though.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
David Magda dma...@ee.ryerson.ca writes:
On Apr 7, 2009, at 16:43, OpenSolaris Forums wrote:
if you have a snapshot of your files and rsync the same files again,
you need to use --inplace rsync option , otherwise completely new
blocks will be allocated for the new files. that`s because rsync
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
