[zfs-discuss] cannot destroy, volume is busy

2013-02-21 Thread John D Groenveld
# zfs list -t vol NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT rpool/dump4.00G 99.9G 4.00G - rpool/foo128 66.2M 100G16K - rpool/swap4.00G 99.9G 4.00G - # zfs destroy rpool/foo128 cannot destroy 'rpool/foo128': volume is busy I checked that the volume is not a dump or swap

Re: [zfs-discuss] cannot destroy, volume is busy

2013-02-21 Thread John D Groenveld
In message 7f44e458-5d27-42b6-ac81-7f4ff61d6...@gmail.com, Richard Elling wri tes: The iSCSI service is not STMF. STMF will need to be disabled, or the = volume no longer used by STMF. iSCSI service is svc:/network/iscsi/target:default STMF service is svc:/system/stmf:default Thank you for the

Re: [zfs-discuss] HELP! RPool problem

2013-02-16 Thread John D Groenveld
In message CANxrvgW3oHstp7gtMxjbqU6u4KdvESvXZ_x1facpp=ozzgv...@mail.gmail.com , Karl Wagner writes: The SSD was the first boot drive, and every time it tried to boot it panicked and rebooted, ending up in a loop. I tried to change to the second rpool drive, but either I forgot to install grub on

Re: [zfs-discuss] The format command crashes on 3TB disk but zpool create ok

2012-12-13 Thread John D Groenveld
# pstack core John groenv...@acm.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

[zfs-discuss] S11 zfs snapshot crash

2012-07-10 Thread John D Groenveld
I am toying with Phil Brown's zrep script. Does anyone have an Oracle BugID for this crashdump? #!/bin/ksh srcfs=rpool/testvol destfs=rpool/destvol snap=${srcfs}@zrep_00 zfs destroy -r $srcfs zfs destroy -r $destfs zfs create -V 100M $srcfs zfs set foo:bar=foobar $srcfs zfs create -o

Re: [zfs-discuss] (fwd) Re: ZFS NFS service hanging on Sunday morning

2012-06-14 Thread John D Groenveld
In message 201206141413.q5eedvzq017...@mklab.ph.rhul.ac.uk, tpc...@mklab.ph.r hul.ac.uk writes: Memory: 2048M phys mem, 32M free mem, 16G total swap, 16G free swap My WAG is that your zpool history is hanging due to lack of RAM. John groenv...@acm.org

Re: [zfs-discuss] Is there an actual newsgroup for zfs-discuss?

2012-06-11 Thread John D Groenveld
In message 008c01cd4812$7399c180$5acd4480$@net, David Combs writes: Actual newsgroup for zfs-discuss? Did you try Gmane's interface? URL:http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=jo43q0%24no50%241%40tr22n12.aset.psu.edu John groenv...@acm.org ___

Re: [zfs-discuss] Spare drive inherited cksum errors?

2012-05-29 Thread John D Groenveld
In message 4fc509e8.8080...@jvm.de, Stephan Budach writes: If now I'd only knew how to get the actual S11 release level of my box. Neither uname -a nor cat /etc/release does give me a clue, since they display all the same data when run on different hosts that are on different updates. $ pkg

Re: [zfs-discuss] Good tower server for around 1,250 USD?

2012-03-30 Thread John D Groenveld
In message 4f7571de.7080...@netdemons.com, Erik Trimble writes: Oracle (that is, if Oracle hasn't completely stopped selling support contracts for Solaris for non-Oracle hardware already). Still available on Oracle Store:

Re: [zfs-discuss] kernel panic during zfs import [ORACLE should notice this]

2012-03-30 Thread John D Groenveld
In message 4f735451.2020...@oracle.com, Deepak Honnalli writes: Thanks for your reply. I would love to take a look at the core file. If there is a way this can somehow be transferred to the internal cores server, I can work on the bug. I am not sure about the modalities of

Re: [zfs-discuss] kernel panic during zfs import [ORACLE should notice this]

2012-03-28 Thread John D Groenveld
In message zarafa.4f7307dd.297a.5713b0445a582...@zarafa.mpi-bremen.de, =?utf- 8?Q?Carsten_John?= writes: I just spent about an hour (or two) trying to file a bug report regarding the issue without success. Seems to me, that I'm too stupid to use this MyOracleSupport portal. So, as I'm getting

Re: [zfs-discuss] Good tower server for around 1,250 USD?

2012-03-26 Thread John D Groenveld
In message alpine.gso.2.01.1203221338170.23...@freddy.simplesystems.org, Bob Friesenhahn writes: Almost all of the systems listed on the HCL are defunct and no longer purchasable except for on the used market. Obtaining an approved system seems very difficult. In spite of this, Solaris runs

Re: [zfs-discuss] Any recommendations on Perc H700 controller on Dell Rx10 ?

2012-03-10 Thread John D Groenveld
In message caniy96a2t1n2m0kpmdx2rbodogjofetoth2qe4rot6x-xn8...@mail.gmail.com , Sriram Narayanan writes: At work, I have an R510, and R610 and an R710 - all with the H700 PERC controller. BTW with some effort, Dell's sales critter will sell you the H200 LSI SAS HBA as a replacement for the H700

Re: [zfs-discuss] 4k sector support in Solaris 11?

2012-02-21 Thread John D Groenveld
In message 4f435ca9.8010...@tuneunix.com, nathank writes: Is there actually a fix to allow manual setting of ashift now that I No. URL:http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23824_01/html/821-1462/zpool-1m.html John groenv...@acm.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list

Re: [zfs-discuss] 4k sector support in Solaris 11?

2012-02-16 Thread John D Groenveld
In message cb62bfe5.52f20%dave@alfordmedia.com, Dave Pooser writes: If I want to use a batch of new Seagate 3TB Barracudas with Solaris 11, I'm using the Seagate's 3TB external drive with S11. Seagate Expansion 3 TB USB 3.0 Desktop External Hard Drive STAY3000102 will zpool let me create a

Re: [zfs-discuss] Can I create a mirror for a root rpool?

2011-12-15 Thread John D Groenveld
In message a8a35e221e94fdd99d3467bf6113d...@remailer.privacy.at, Anonymous R emailer (austria) writes: On Solaris 10 If I install using ZFS root on only one drive is there a way to add another drive as a mirror later? Sorry if this was discussed already. I searched the archives and couldn't find

Re: [zfs-discuss] weird bug with Seagate 3TB USB3 drive

2011-12-05 Thread John D Groenveld
In message 4ebbfb5...@oracle.com, Cindy Swearingen writes: CR 7102272: ZFS storage pool created on a 3 TB USB 3.0 device has device label problems Let us know if this is still a problem in the OS11 FCS release. I finally got upgraded from Solaris 11 Express SRU 12 to S11 FCS. Solaris 11

Re: [zfs-discuss] weird bug with Seagate 3TB USB3 drive

2011-11-10 Thread John D Groenveld
In message 4e9db04b.80...@oracle.com, Cindy Swearingen writes: This is CR 7102272. What is the title of this BugId? I'm trying to attach my Oracle CSI to it but Chuck Rozwat and company's support engineer can't seem to find it. Once I get upgraded from S11x SRU12 to S11, I'll reproduce on a more

Re: [zfs-discuss] weird bug with Seagate 3TB USB3 drive

2011-10-18 Thread John D Groenveld
In message 201110150202.p9f22w2n000...@elvis.arl.psu.edu, John D Groenveld writes: I'm baffled why zpool import is unable to find the pool on the drive, but the drive is definitely functional. Per Richard Elling, it looks like ZFS is unable to find the requisite labels for importing. John

Re: [zfs-discuss] weird bug with Seagate 3TB USB3 drive

2011-10-18 Thread John D Groenveld
In message 4e9d98b1.8040...@oracle.com, Cindy Swearingen writes: I'm going to file a CR to get this issue reviewed by the USB team first, but if you could humor me with another test: Can you run newfs to create a UFS file system on this device and mount it? # uname -srvp SunOS 5.11 151.0.1.12

Re: [zfs-discuss] weird bug with Seagate 3TB USB3 drive

2011-10-18 Thread John D Groenveld
In message 4e9da8b1.7020...@oracle.com, Cindy Swearingen writes: 1. If you re-create the pool on the whole disk, like this: # zpool create foo c1t0d0 Then, resend the prtvtoc output for c1t0d0s0. # zpool create snafu c1t0d0 # zpool status snafu pool: snafu state: ONLINE scan: none requested

Re: [zfs-discuss] weird bug with Seagate 3TB USB3 drive

2011-10-18 Thread John D Groenveld
In message 4e9db04b.80...@oracle.com, Cindy Swearingen writes: This is CR 7102272. Anyone out there have Western Digital's competing 3TB Passport drive handy to duplicate this bug? John groenv...@acm.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list

Re: [zfs-discuss] weird bug with Seagate 3TB USB3 drive

2011-10-14 Thread John D Groenveld
As a sanity check, I connected the drive to a Windows 7 installation. I was able to partition, create an NTFS volume on it, eject and remount it. I also tried creating the zpool on my Solaris 10 system, exporting and trying to import the pool on my Solaris 11X system and again no love. I'm

Re: [zfs-discuss] weird bug with Seagate 3TB USB3 drive

2011-10-13 Thread John D Groenveld
In message 201110131150.p9dbo8yk011...@acsinet22.oracle.com, Casper.Dik@oracl e.com writes: What is the partition table? I thought about that so I reproduced with the legacy SMI label and a Solaris fdisk partition with ZFS on slice 0. Same result as EFI; once I export the pool I cannot import it.

Re: [zfs-discuss] weird bug with Seagate 3TB USB3 drive

2011-10-13 Thread John D Groenveld
In message 4e970387.3040...@oracle.com, Cindy Swearingen writes: Any USB-related messages in /var/adm/messages for this device? Negative. cfgadm(1M) shows the drive and format-fdisk-analyze-read runs merrily. John groenv...@acm.org ___ zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] weird bug with Seagate 3TB USB3 drive

2011-10-12 Thread John D Groenveld
In message 4e95cb2a.30...@oracle.com, Cindy Swearingen writes: What is the error when you attempt to import this pool? cannot import 'foo': no such pool available John groenv...@acm.org # format -e Searching for disks...done AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: 0. c1t0d0 Seagate-External-SG11 cyl

Re: [zfs-discuss] weird bug with Seagate 3TB USB3 drive

2011-10-12 Thread John D Groenveld
In message 4e95e10f.9070...@oracle.com, Cindy Swearingen writes: In the steps below, you're missing a zpool import step. I would like to see the error message when the zpool import step fails. zpool import returns nothing. The truss shows it poking around c1t0d0 fdisk partitions and Solaris

[zfs-discuss] weird bug with Seagate 3TB USB3 drive

2011-10-11 Thread John D Groenveld
Banging my head against a Seagate 3TB USB3 drive. Its marketing name is: Seagate Expansion 3 TB USB 3.0 Desktop External Hard Drive STAY3000102 format(1M) shows it identify itself as: Seagate-External-SG11-2.73TB Under both Solaris 10 and Solaris 11x, I receive the evil message: | I/O request is

Re: [zfs-discuss] Kernel panic on zpool import. 200G of data inaccessible!

2011-08-19 Thread John D Groenveld
In message 1313687977.77375.yahoomail...@web121903.mail.ne1.yahoo.com, Stu Wh itefish writes: Nope, not a clue how to do that and I have installed Windows on this box inste ad of Solaris since I can't get my data back from ZFS. I have my two drives the pool is on disconnected so if this ever gets

Re: [zfs-discuss] Kernel panic on zpool import. 200G of data inaccessible!

2011-08-15 Thread John D Groenveld
In message 1313431448.5331.yahoomail...@web121911.mail.ne1.yahoo.com, Stu Whi tefish writes: I'm sorry, I don't understand this suggestion. The pool that won't import is a mirror on two drives. Disconnect all but the two mirrored drives that you must import and try to import from a S11X LiveUSB.

Re: [zfs-discuss] Resizing ZFS partition, shrinking NTFS?

2011-06-16 Thread John D Groenveld
In message 444915109.61308252125289.JavaMail.Twebapp@sf-app1, Clive Meredith writes: I currently run a duel boot machine with a 45Gb partition for Win7 Ultimate an d a 25Gb partition for OpenSolaris 10 (134). I need to shrink NTFS to 20Gb an d increase the ZFS partion to 45Gb. Is this possible

Re: [zfs-discuss] Compatibility between Sun-Oracle Fishworks appliance zfs and other zfs implementations

2011-05-26 Thread John D Groenveld
In message 4dddc270.6060...@u.washington.edu, Matt Weatherford writes: amount of $ on. This is a great box and we love it, although the EDU discounts that Sun used to provide for hardware and support contracts seem to have dried up so the cost of supporting it moving forward is still unknown.

Re: [zfs-discuss] How do you use 1 partition on x86?

2010-10-25 Thread John D Groenveld
In message 1026474698.131288014974214.javamail.tweb...@sf-app1, Bill Werner w rites: So when I built my new workstation last year, I partitioned the one and only d isk in half, 50% for Windows, 50% for 2009.06. Now, I'm not using Windows, s o I'd like to use the other half for another ZFS pool,

Re: [zfs-discuss] BugID 6961707

2010-10-07 Thread John D Groenveld
In message 201008112022.o7bkmc2j028...@elvis.arl.psu.edu, John D Groenveld wr ites: I'm stumbling over BugID 6961707 on build 134. I see the bug has been stomped in build 150. Awesome! URL:http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6961707 In which build did it first arrive

Re: [zfs-discuss] Opensolaris is apparently dead

2010-08-18 Thread John D Groenveld
In message 4c6c4e30.7060...@ianshome.com, Ian Collins writes: If you count Monday this week as lately, we have never had to wait more than 24 hours for replacement drives for our 45x0 or 7000 series Same here, but two weeks ago for a failed drive in an X4150. Last week SunSolve was sending my

[zfs-discuss] BugID 6961707

2010-08-11 Thread John D Groenveld
I'm stumbling over BugID 6961707 on build 134. OpenSolaris Development snv_134 X86 Via the b134 Live CD, when I try to zpool import -f -F -n rpool I get this helpful panic. panic[cpu4]/thread=ff006cd06c60: zfs: allocating allocated segment(offset=95698377728 size=16384) ff006cd06580